Mash | Fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash

I have input data (df) for making 2*2 contingency table for each row.

I have this table dump from a MySQL system, and although it follows RFC standards, it appears to have added unwanted space in columns where HTML text are stored. For example:

First of all I want to apologise for my English cause I come from Poland and I'm still learning. I'm a beginner C#/Unity programmer and I have a pretty stupid/noob question/issue where player jumps twice when mashing the space. When the framerate is low for ex. 30, the problem occurs almost everytime and when framerate is for ex. 144 - hardly ever. I did some research and tried different methods. Firstly I checked whether I have all my inputs in Update and not FixedUpdate. That wasn't the problem at all. Then I tried replacing Input.GetKey to Input.GetKeyDown and GetKeyUp in Update as to ensure I have my boolean _spacePressed checked or not. That wasn't the solution too. The third thing I tried was to use Raycasting to check whether the player is grounded. With that I also checked whether when I jump, ray doesn't get checked twice. To make things clear I'm currently trying to make a 2.5D platformer. So to sum up I'm asking what could be the main issue (with input probably) where player jumps twice or even three times in a single frame when mashing space. Here's also my prototype code. I used enums to make a simple state "machine". If you have also any advice for me and my code to make things better apart from my question I would love to hear them. Thank you in advance!

With following code I am trying to import excel file to indesign. I can get data but if in table is more then 3 rows it just continue in line and doesn't create new line.

I'm having a bit of trouble getting they type assertions I'd like to have.

I have a function

I have the following code (CodeSandbox):

Before you mash the duplicate button, I know there are more posts on the same issue and I've tried the solutions to no avail (Please see the last part of my post).

I'm using React 17.0.2, ESLint 8.5.0 and Prettier 2.5.1 and I'm getting the following error in almost every js file.

I've got a txt file with the following content:

#test.txt

The Derecho system (open-source C++ library for data replication, distributed coordination, Paxos -- ultra-fast) is built around asynchronous RDMA networking primitives. Senders can write to receivers without pausing, using RDMA transfers into receiver memory. Typically this is done in two steps: we transfer the data bytes in one operation, then notify the receiver by incrementing a counter or setting a flag: "message 67 is ready for you, now". Soon the receiver will notice that message 67 is ready, at which point it will access the bytes of that message.

Intended semantic: "seeing the counter updated should imply that the receiver's C++ code will see the bytes of the message." In PL terms, we need a memory fence between the update of the guard and the bytes of the message. The individual cache-lines must also be sequentially consistent: my guard will go through values like 67, 68, .... and I don't want any form of mashed up value or non-monotonic sequencing, such as could arise if C++ reads a stale cache line, or mistakenly holds a stale value in memory. Same for the message buffer itself: these bytes might overwrite old bytes and I don't want to see some kind of mashup.

This is the crux of my question: I need a weak atomic that will impose [exactly] the needed barrier, without introducing unwanted overheads. Which annotation would be appropriate? Would the weak atomic annotation be the same for the "message" as for the counter (the "guard")?

Secondary question: If I declare my buffer with the proper weak atomic, do I also need to say that it is "volatile", or will C++ realize this because the memory was declared weakly atomic?