oop | Object-oriented programming course | Functional Programming library
kandi X-RAY | oop Summary
kandi X-RAY | oop Summary
Object-oriented programming course
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of oop
oop Key Features
oop Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on oop
QUESTION
So, I am working on an MVVM-based core SDK for use any time I am developing some Google Apps Script based software, called OpenSourceSDK
. It contain core business logic, including base classes to extend. For example, the file Models/BaseModel.gs
in it is defined to be:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 22:53I was able to get it resolved, but the solution is...hacky.
So, apparently, Google Apps Script exports only what is in globalThis
of a project: just the function
s and var
iables. No class
es, no const
ants, ...
Probably has a lot to do with how ES6 works, with its globalThis
behavior. One can see that in action, by creating a dummy function
, a dummy var
iable, and a dummy class
in their local developer console:
QUESTION
I couldn't find an equivalent k8s cli command to do something like this, nor any ssh keys stored as k8s secrets. It also appears to do this in a cloud-agnostic fashion.
Is it just using a k8s pod with special privileges or something?
Edit: oops, it's open-source. I'll investigate and update this question accordingly
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 09:08Posting this community wiki answer to give more visibility on the comment that was made at a github issue that addressed this question:
Lens will create
nsenter
pod to the selected node
QUESTION
I am venturing into python and wondering what one should look for to make a choice whether to use Object Oriented Programming paradigm or to remain on procedural paradigm. I developed a small program that looks for duplicate media files in two hard drives and delete the duplicates ones in the send drive. Would it best leaving the program as it is or try out the OOP. If yes how best can I convert it to OOP? Disclaimer: Am still a beginner in python so the code may not be in the right shape as required. Sorry for verbosity.
Sample of the program:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 06:19It depends whether you want to enhance the project from time to time then oops is better for ease of maintainability and for larger projects but if you don't want to extend it then using procedural paradigm approach is just fine , while using oops also you use it in class methods .Oops makes more sense when you try to simulate real world environment or something related to real life objects and phenomenon , algorithms are also mostly implemented using procedural paradigm approach , for me procedural paradigm approach works fine untill code reaches 150 lines of code
QUESTION
i am currently a bit stuck in programming a PROCESSING Sketch. Lets say I have a bunch of rectangles that move up the sketch window like bubbles… They have different sizing and color… And I want to let them rotate around its own axis while they move up. I tried using pushMatrix(); and popMatrix(); – and even translate(); but I guess its a bit more complicated because i use OoP and variables in the constructor for X and Y Position of each rectangle…
This is the code to my sketch:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 18:01When rotating something in place, what usually works best is using translate
in such a way that you're drawing it "at the origin". In your case, that means that you want to translate such that the first two parameters of rect()
are both zero. So you translate, then rotate, then draw the rectangle "at the origin".
Solution:
QUESTION
I'm trying to learn OOP with C#. Target framework: .net core 3.1. I have two classes. In the first one I initialize timer:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 13:17You're very close! As Chamika pointed out in the comments, you're interacting with two different instances of your Test
class. The new
keyword means just that, a new
instance is created of Test
.
To correct this, you can create either a global variable
or pass the instance to your Start()
and Stop()
methods.
First, I'm going to show the global variable
solution.
Without editing your Test
class, I've modified your Program
class. I've created a global variable
: myTimer
. myTimer
is set to a new instance of the Test
class. I also removed the other instance creations from your Start()
and Stop()
methods. Because they are in the same Program
class, they will be able to interact with your global variable
whether it's set to public
or private
!
QUESTION
I am trying to raise different exceptions for different conditions. The first exception is to check the lastNumber == 0 and the second exception is to check the type of the variables. I'm facing an issue while raising the second exception.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 17:04def divide():
try:
firstNumber = float(input("Enter First Number : "))
lastNumber = float(input("Enter Last Number : "))
result = firstNumber / lastNumber
return result
except ZeroDivisionError:
print("Can not divide with zero")
except ValueError:
print('Input should be a Real Number')
finally:
print("Division on integer finished")
result = divide()
if result:
print('Division of two numbers is', result)
QUESTION
I have a class Group
containing a vector of objects of another class Entry
. Inside the Group
I need to frequently access the elements of this vector(either consequently and in random order). The Entry
class can represent a data of two different types with the same properties(size, content, creation time etc.). So all of the members and methods of the Entry
class are the same for both data types, except for one method, that should behave differently depending on the type of the data. It looks like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 16:04is it worth it to make a class polymorphic just because of one only among many other of its method is needed to behave differently depending on the data type?
Runtime polymorphism starts to provide undeniable net value when the class hierarchy is deep, or may grow arbitrarily in future. So, if this code is just used in the private implementation of a small library you're writing, start with what's more efficient if you have real reason to care about efficiency (type_
and if
), then it's not much work to change it later anyway. If lots of client code may start to depend your choices here though, making it difficult to change later, and there's some prospect of further versions of someMethod()
being needed, it's probably better to start with the virtual dispatch approach.
Is there any better approach?
Again - what's "better" takes shape at scale and depends on how the code is depended upon, updated etc.. Other possible approaches include using a std::variant
, or even a std::any
object, function pointers....
QUESTION
I have a settings array of config values that don't change and need to use these values in various classes.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 17:51If these values really are fixed, you could have the classes import a trait that holds the settings and also incorporates any common functionality you need.
QUESTION
class Package{
private:
float weight;
float cost;
public:
Package(float weight, float cost){
setNumber(weight, cost);
}
void setNumber(float weight, float cost){
this->weight = weight;
this->cost = cost;
}
float getWeight(){
return this->weight;
}
float getCost(){
return this->cost;
}
float calculateCost(){
return getWeight()*getCost();
}
};
class TwoDayPackage : private Package{
private:
float fee;
public:
TwoDayPackage(float fee){
setFee(fee);
}
void setFee(float fee){
this->fee = fee;
}
float getFee(){
return this->fee;
}
float calculateCost(){
return Package::calculateCost() + getFee();
}
};
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 17:53There some "hidden" code here:
QUESTION
i have problem about design a module of my project.
Lets say, you have two classes which both of them almost doing the same thing. You can think like DeviceManager.
Both of them connect/disconnect/parse exactly the same way. After parse the message from device they need to do different things like one of them print a message, the other one pass it to somewhere else.
I need to design this structure best as oop allows maybe with inheritance,interface,abstract etc. but i am not sure what is the best way to approach this problem.
Note: I dont want to violate any SOLID principle.
Thanks.
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 11:40From Olivier's answer i drafted this one, i am not sure this is the best approach.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install oop
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page