outcome | lightweight outcome < T > and result < T > ( non-Boost edition | SDK library
kandi X-RAY | outcome Summary
kandi X-RAY | outcome Summary
Provides very lightweight outcome
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of outcome
outcome Key Features
outcome Examples and Code Snippets
def sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2( # pylint: disable=invalid-name
labels=None,
logits=None,
name=None):
r"""Computes sigmoid cross entropy given `logits`.
Measures the probability error in tasks with two outcomes in which eac
private static String solution_elegent(int rows, int cols, int startRow, int startCol, int targetRow, int targetCol) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
if (startRow == 1 && startCol == 1) {
if ((targetRow %
def sample_from_datasets_v2(datasets,
weights=None,
seed=None,
stop_on_empty_dataset=False):
"""Samples elements at random from the datasets in `datasets`.
Creat
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on outcome
QUESTION
I want to apply given function to each row of dataframe and use another values of row, as input parameters/arguments:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-14 at 12:28You can use apply
on the rows (MARGIN = 1
).
QUESTION
Here is the dataset.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-11 at 11:17Here's a way using separate_rows
:
QUESTION
Suppose I have a dataframe as below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-20 at 00:07Taking advantage of numpy broadcasting, you can do it easily:
QUESTION
I wonder why two data frames a
and b
have different outcomes when a non-existent rowname is retrieved. For example,
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-15 at 04:25Synthesizing some of the comments here...
?`[`
says:
Unlike S (Becker et al p. 358), R never uses partial matching when extracting by
[
, and partial matching is not by default used by[[
(see argumentexact
).
But ?`[.data.frame`
says:
Both
[
and[[
extraction methods partially match row names. By default neither partially match column names, but[[
will ifexact = FALSE
(and with a warning ifexact = NA
). If you want to exact matching on row names usematch
, as in the examples.
The example given there is:
QUESTION
I have built a pixel classifier for images, and for each pixel in the image, I want to define to which pre-defined color cluster it belongs. It works, but at some 5 minutes per image, I think I am doing something unpythonic that can for sure be optimized.
How can we map the function directly over the list of lists?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-23 at 07:41Just quick speedups:
- You can omit
math.sqrt()
- Create dictionary of colors instead of a list (that way you don't have to search for the index each iteration)
- use
min()
instead ofsorted()
QUESTION
I have a data frame ordered by id variables ("city"), and I want to keep the second observation of those cities that have more than one observation.
For example, here's an example data set:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-01 at 02:08You may try
QUESTION
I'm getting an error when attempting to compile Haskell tests using test-framework on Windows.
Steps to reproduceCreate a new library using Stack:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-20 at 14:21I assume, given when you posted this question, you are using LTS 18.17. Looking at that LTS, it uses mintty 0.1.3. Looking in mintty 0.1.3's cabal file shows a special flag that is enabled by default that means that System.Console.MinTTY.Win32
is not included. The comments in that cabal file say that that flag should be used when using Win32 2.13.1.0 or newer.
However, when I look at LTS 18's configuration in Stackage, I can see that it is using Win32 2.6.2.1, so that flag ought to be set to false for this package to work.
So let's check that in the Stackage build constraints. I see that another flag is being set, and it seems to be an old flag that is no longer used (looks like it was used in an older 0.1.2 version). This must be the problem.
The solution: manually set the flag in your stack.yaml:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-20 at 10:52So the solution is quiet simple. All I had to do is using a Webpack plugin.
The best Plugin to fit this task is NormalModuleReplacementPlugin
which is provided out of the box by Webpack itself.
The exclude
in tsconfig.ts
is no longer reasonable within this solution.
Simply provide the following plugin:
QUESTION
Let's say I have two data frames I want to bind:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-25 at 20:17dplyr
developers recommend rbindlist()
for this apparently: https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/1162
QUESTION
In short:
I have implemented a simple (multi-key) hash table with buckets (containing several elements) that exactly fit a cacheline. Inserting into a cacheline bucket is very simple, and the critical part of the main loop.
I have implemented three versions that produce the same outcome and should behave the same.
The mystery
However, I'm seeing wild performance differences by a surprisingly large factor 3, despite all versions having the exact same cacheline access pattern and resulting in identical hash table data.
The best implementation insert_ok
suffers around a factor 3 slow down compared to insert_bad
& insert_alt
on my CPU (i7-7700HQ).
One variant insert_bad is a simple modification of insert_ok
that adds an extra unnecessary linear search within the cacheline to find the position to write to (which it already knows) and does not suffer this x3 slow down.
The exact same executable shows insert_ok
a factor 1.6 faster compared to insert_bad
& insert_alt
on other CPUs (AMD 5950X (Zen 3), Intel i7-11800H (Tiger Lake)).
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-25 at 22:53The TLDR is that loads which miss all levels of the TLB (and so require a page walk) and which are separated by address unknown stores can't execute in parallel, i.e., the loads are serialized and the memory level parallelism (MLP) factor is capped at 1. Effectively, the stores fence the loads, much as lfence
would.
The slow version of your insert function results in this scenario, while the other two don't (the store address is known). For large region sizes the memory access pattern dominates, and the performance is almost directly related to the MLP: the fast versions can overlap load misses and get an MLP of about 3, resulting in a 3x speedup (and the narrower reproduction case we discuss below can show more than a 10x difference on Skylake).
The underlying reason seems to be that the Skylake processor tries to maintain page-table coherence, which is not required by the specification but can work around bugs in software.
The DetailsFor those who are interested, we'll dig into the details of what's going on.
I could reproduce the problem immediately on my Skylake i7-6700HQ machine, and by stripping out extraneous parts we can reduce the original hash insert benchmark to this simple loop, which exhibits the same issue:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install outcome
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page