mpz | Music player for big local collections | Audio Utils library
kandi X-RAY | mpz Summary
kandi X-RAY | mpz Summary
Music player for big local collections
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mpz
mpz Key Features
mpz Examples and Code Snippets
columns_config:
- align: left
field: artist
stretch: false
width_percent: 28
- align: left
field: album
stretch: false
width_percent: 28
- align: left
field: title
stretch: false
width_percent: 28
- align:
git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/mpz.git
cd mpz
makepkg -si
git clone git@github.com:olegantonyan/mpz.git
cd mpz
mkdir build
cd build
qmake-qt5 CONFIG+=release ..
make -j`nproc`
# now you now use app/mpz binary directly
# optionally, install to /
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mpz
QUESTION
I have a Textfile containing numbers that looks as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-23 at 13:42I tried look at a more elegant solution from both the human-readable perspective and from the performance perspective.
Caveats:
- There is a lot going on here
- I do not have the original file, so the numbers below will not match any numbers you might get on your device
- There is too much work to try and benchmark all the various parts so I tried to focus on several of the biggest components
The breakouts and timing below seem to show an order of magnitude difference in several of the approaches, so they may still be of use in gauging level of computational effort.
My first approach was to try and measure the amount of overhead the file read/write added to the process so that we could explore how much computational effort was focused on just the data processing step.
To do this, I made a function that included the file read and measured the whole process, end to end to see how long it took with my mini example file. I did this using %timeit
in a Jupyter notebook.
I then broke out the file reading step into it's own function and then used %timeit
on just the data processing step to help show us:
- how much time was used by file reads vs data processing in the original approach
- how much time was used by the data processing approach in the improved approach.
QUESTION
The bottleneck of my code is the repeated calling of pow(base,exponent,modulus) for very large integers (numpy does not support such large integers, about 100 to 256 bits). However, my exponent and modulus is always the same. Could I somehow utilize this to speed the computation up with a custom function? I tried to define a function as seen below (function below is for general modulus and exponent).
However, even if I hardcode every operation without the while-loop and if-statements for a fixed exponent and modulus, it is slower than pow.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-23 at 21:54Looking at the wiki page. Doesn't seem like your implementation is correct. Moving the those two statements out of else have improved the performance significantly.
This is what I have from Wikipedia
QUESTION
In the second line before the out statement the answer is -1, buy due to my print it should be the answer: 618970019642690137449562111, which is 2**89-1, instead i'm getting -1
I can't for the life of me figure out what the bug is, could someone enlighten me? Why am i getting -1 there instead of 618970019642690137449562111
Here is the code, the error with the "-1" is two lines right before the "[Out 778:]" statement ( you have to scroll right to see it). It should keep climbing the powers of 2 tree minus 1 but it gives the answer -1 which is incorrect:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 22:41It's an overflow error. You can use python's int
which doesn't overflow. You can add dtype
to your mersenne
array to solve it:
QUESTION
I am porting my c++ code from Linux to Windows using MSYS2 (64 bit). The key library is GNU MP (gmplib). The following code gives wrong results in MSYS2/MinGW64 environment while in Ubuntu works fine. Apparantly there is an unwanted conversion from 64 bit integer to 32 bit unteger when using mpz_set_ui
function.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 00:29The mpz_get_ui()
function returns an unsigned long
, NOT an unsigned long long
.
On Linux/GCC, unsigned long
is a 64-bit value, however the C++ standard only requires that unsigned long
support values up to 4'294'967'295
, which can be satisfied by a 32-bit integer. Linux allows larger values, but MSVC and MinGW on Windows will use a 32-bit integer for unsigned long
. This means that on Windows, your 64-bit input value in mps_set_ui()
is downgraded to a 32-bit value.
Therefore the behavior on both compilers is correct, you've tripped over a platform-specific implementation detail.
If you wish to allow use of 64-bit integers everywhere, you should use fixed bit-width integer types (e.g. uint64_t
instead of unsigned long
), but that stil won't allow you to specify 64-bit integers mp_set_ui
on Windows unfortunately.
QUESTION
This piece of code
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-01 at 12:14Found the problem:
value.setValue(nullptr);
in the constructor, where value is QVariant.
Removed this line and now it compiles OK. Not sure why I put it there in the first place
QUESTION
I would like to use GMP on windows, and I need to build static programs. (which means that, if anyone can provide another solution to compile win32 x86_64 programs using libgmp, I will also appreciate it.)
Now I have msys2 installed, and in it I have executed
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-04 at 00:30With the help of @HolyBlackCat, I solved this problem and successfully compiled my programs. Here is the process:
Install msys2- Download the executable file from msys2.org and install msys2. You will get three shortcuts in your opening menu: MSYS MinGW 32-bit, MSYS2 MinGW 64-bit and MSYS2 MSYS. The difference between them is the PATH. MSYS's path is /usr/bin, while MinGW 64-bit's path includes /mingw64/bin.
- Install necessary packages. Run the following commands:
QUESTION
I'm developing a Python library for cryptography. I wanted to optimize my library by writing the main classes in C++ with GMP. I wrote my C++ classes and I wrote the extern
methods to use the main arithmetic operations: addition, subtraction, etc... These methods returns the results as char* to avoid cast problems. I built the DLL of my library and I declared the methods in a Python wrapper with ctypes. I noticed that after each arithmetic operation with huge numbers the memory grew exponentially. I was looking for problems in my C++ implementation, but there were no problems thanks to the C++ garbage collector. I was looking for a possible solution, so I discovered that I had to implement a C++ method to free up memory of the string created by the DLL. So I wrote this simple method:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-18 at 14:08The problem is in this line:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mpz
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page