Genetic-Prog | Simple Code For Genetic Programming in C | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | Genetic-Prog Summary
kandi X-RAY | Genetic-Prog Summary
Simple Code For Genetic Programming in C++
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Genetic-Prog
Genetic-Prog Key Features
Genetic-Prog Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Genetic-Prog
QUESTION
Multiple, perhaps most, language implementations that include a compiler at runtime neglect to garbage-collect discarded code (See, for example julia, where this leads to memory leaks in applications like genetic-programming)
My preliminary tests indicate that Chez Scheme does not leak memory here, but I would like to know with greater certainty, since I don't even know if f
and g
actually get compiled. (The old mantra: "Tests can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence")
The test I tried: f
and g
call each other, and their definitions get replaced at runtime.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-24 at 07:31Given the importance of both procedures and garbage collection to Scheme, I would be surprised if Chez Scheme did not try to garbage collect any dynamically created objects. The R6RS Standard says [emphasis mine]:
All objects created in the course of a Scheme computation, including procedures and continuations, have unlimited extent. No Scheme object is ever destroyed. The reason that implementations of Scheme do not (usually!) run out of storage is that they are permitted to reclaim the storage occupied by an object if they can prove that the object cannot possibly matter to any future computation.
A procedure is an object, and any object may be garbage collected if the implementation can prove that the computation will not need it again. This is not a requirement, but that goes for any object, not just for procedures.
The Chez Scheme manual seems definitive, though (Chez Scheme Version 9 User's Guide, p. 82):
Since all Scheme objects, including code objects, can be relocated or even reclaimed by the garbage collector....
In the 1990s Kent Dybvig wrote a paper together with David Eby and Carl Bruggeman which may be of interest here, called Don’t Stop the BIBOP: Flexible and Efficient Storage Management for Dynamically Typed Languages, which describes the garbage collection strategy implemented in Chez Scheme. In the paper some time is spent discussing "code objects" and in particular how they are segregated and treated differently during the garbage collection process (since they may contain pointers to other objects).
QUESTION
I am testing a code written and posted on the website
http://foreverlearning.altervista.org/genetic-programming-symbolic-regression-pt-3/
The portion of the code is located at the bottom part of the webpage. When running the test code mainpova.py, I am getting the syntax error.
The syntax error is,
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-11 at 23:57You can see the error highlighted here:
QUESTION
I am testing a code written and posted on the website
http://foreverlearning.altervista.org/genetic-programming-symbolic-regression-pt-3/
The portion of the code is located at the bottom part of the webpage. When running the test code mainpova.py, I am getting the syntax error.
The syntax error is,
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-11 at 21:11Line 117 your for loop with the comment # Crossover is out of scope of the definition inside next()
QUESTION
I am running a code taken from the website
http://foreverlearning.altervista.org/genetic-programming-symbolic-regression-pt-2/
at the bottom of the page. This is a part when testing treeOperations.py.
To test this code, I run the mainprova.py code that is provided at the bottom of the page after treeOperations.py listing. I am getting the following syntax error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-10 at 00:51<
is the HTML entity for <
. There is apparently some sort of bug in the linked site that is causing things to be HTML-escaped that shouldn't be. Replace <=
with <=
.
QUESTION
I came across the following code taken from here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-28 at 22:14As others have pointed out, you can use BitMap.LockBits
and use pointers instead of GetPixel
. The following runs about 200 times faster than the original approach:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Genetic-Prog
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page