paping | Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/paping | Translation library

by rampageX C++ Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | paping Summary

paping is a C++ library typically used in Utilities, Translation applications. paping has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

#Can you help? UDP I realize that testing UDP ports is not reliable but it would be nice to add the feature - Know how? Please help the project (papingproject@gmail.com). Translation Can you help translate the strings used, if so please check out the Wiki article 'Translation' for a list.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

paping has a low active ecosystem.

It has 21 star(s) with 9 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 19 open issues and 4 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of paping is current.

Quality

paping has no bugs reported.

Security

paping has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

paping is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

paping releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of paping

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

paping Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for paping.

paping Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for paping.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on paping

How can I solve Root mapping definition has unsupported parameters by using nested property for created elasticsearch index?

Any TCP ping with TTL

QUESTION

How can I solve Root mapping definition has unsupported parameters by using nested property for created elasticsearch index?

Asked 2020-Feb-06 at 15:07

How can I create a mapping structure by using nested property for created index? I got an error below. This url produces below result: http://xxx:9200/usereventsreduced-2020/event/_search?pretty=true

UrlQueryString is a nested one! we need describe it is nested.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Feb-06 at 15:07

Notice how the mapping spec looks: https://prnt.sc/qyhwpu

Based on that, you can use this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60097607

QUESTION

Any TCP ping with TTL

Asked 2018-Jul-11 at 09:19

i'm attempting to create a project to compare pings on different datacenters of the major cloud providers. Since ICMP is blocked by the load balancer on Azure VMs i've been forced to use TCP ping instead (PsPing on Win and paping on UNIX) the only problem is that with every ping I also need the associated TTL (which is shown with the standard ping command from the bash:

All the different TCP ping utilities i've found(psping, paping...) doesn't provide this information, does anyone know any utility that could solve my problem? Thank you very much in advance

UPDATE:

I've found hping3, another similar program that offers much more options and display the TTL for every ping(exactly as i wanted) anyway i noticed something strange: In the image there is a test on AWS from eu-west-2a(london) to eu-west-3e(paris) and while with ping the TTL stays stable on 48 with hping3 it floats from 46 to 48 with slightly higher rtt. I suppose the delay in the rtt it's because of the TCP overhead but i don't understand why the ttl is different...

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jul-11 at 09:19

If TTL is different is because the packet is following different paths, here traceroute is your friend, hping3 has a --traceroute option that will allow seeing the different hops and spot the differences (hping3 --traceroute -S -p 80 xxxxx)

Just guessing, maybe Azure is doing something different with the traffic because it has the same pattern of a SYN flood attack.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51261376

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install paping

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: