translation | Provides tools to internationalize your application | Translation library

I regard this as a major bug in String(localizable:). If we were using NSLocalizedString, we would have individual key: and value: parameters. String(localizable:) needs that.

I can think of two workarounds. One is: don't use String(localizable:). Just keep on using NSLocalizedString.

The other is to localize explicitly for English. Instead of entering the English user-facing text as the localized: parameter, enter a key string. Then, to prevent the keys from appearing in the user interface, export the English localization and "translate" the keys into the desired English user-facing text. Now import the localization to generate the correct English .strings files.

(If your development language isn't English, substitute the development language into those instructions.)

Now when you export a different localization, such as French, the element's id value is the key, to which the translator pays no attention, and the is the English, which the translator duly translates.

To change the English user-facing text later on, edit the English Localizable.strings file — not the code. Nothing will break because the key remains constant.

Yes, as of now, the One Definition Rule in the C++ standard doesn't include enumerators.

However, the "the second a is a redeclaration of the first a" explanation doesn't work too.
From [dcl.enum#nt:enumerator-list] we can know that an enumerator-list is a list of enumerator-definition, so they're all definitions.

I found a way to accomplish it. This is what needed

Here are a few thoughts and findings while playing around with this

1. Is the right scale factor being used?

The scaling you use is a bit custom and cannot be compared directly to the examples which has just 1 scale factor like 2 or 3. However, your scale factor has 2 dimensions but I see you compensate for this to get the minimum of the width and height scaling:

Just remove the "extractCss": true from your production environment, it will resolve the problem.

The reason about it is extractCss is deprecated, and it's value is true by default. See more here: Extracting CSS into JS with Angular 11 (deprecated extractCss)

In the OP's example with std::max, an ODR violation does indeed occur, and the program is ill-formed NDR. To avoid this issue, you might consider one of the following fixes:

• give the doMath function internal linkage, or
• move the declaration of kTwo inside doMath

A variable that is used by an expression is considered to be odr-used unless there is a certain kind of simple proof that the reference to the variable can be replaced by the compile-time constant value of the variable without changing the result of the expression. If such a simple proof exists, then the standard requires the compiler perform such a replacement; consequently the variable is not odr-used (in particular, it does not require a definition, and the issue described by the OP would be avoided because none of the translation units in which doMath is defined would actually reference a definition of kTwo). If the expression is too complicated, however, then all bets are off. The compiler might still replace the variable with its value, in which case the program may work as you expect; or the program may exhibit bugs or crash. That's the reality with IFNDR programs.

The case where the variable is immediately passed by reference to a function, with the reference binding directly, is one common case where the variable is used in a way that is too complicated and the compiler is not required to determine whether or not it may be replaced by its compile-time constant value. This is because doing so would necessarily require inspecting the definition of the function (such as std::max in this example).

You can "help" the compiler by writing int(kTwo) and using that as the argument to std::max as opposed to kTwo itself; this prevents an odr-use since the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is now immediately applied prior to calling the function. I don't think this is a great solution (I recommend one of the two solutions that I previously mentioned) but it has its uses (GoogleTest uses this in order to avoid introducing odr-uses in statements like EXPECT_EQ(2, kTwo)).

If you want to know more about how to understand the precise definition of odr-use, involving "potential results of an expression e...", that would be best addressed with a separate question.

You should be able to use the class GCurrency. Can you vars.currency = GCurrency.valueOf(values[5])?

I managed to make this function that does exactly what you want.

Need to down-grade to Keras 1.0.2 If works then great, otherwise I will tell other solution.