Protectors | 🛡️ Obfuscator , Encryption , Junkcode , Anti-Debug , PE | Encryption library

I want to extract the ID from this command:

I've seen similar questions, but answers didn't help. There was only one that got me close enough to what I want, but there are other issues arising from it. I'm trying to get the vertical divider to be the same height all the time, but when each column have a different amount of elements it doesn't work.

HTML

I have a Python dictionary with dictionaries nested heavily within. There are several tiers.

What I am trying to accomplish is a function where I can enter any one of the "subcategories" values, for example, 20003482 or 200000879 and it has to return the first nested subcategory key, so for the above examples, 100003109

I am unsure about the best way to go about this, but I've tried something like

I have this data,

I'm trying to get a specific value out of the manage-bde -status C: command, which returns the following: BitLocker Drive Encryption: Configuration Tool version 10.0.18362 Copyright (C) 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Volume C: [] [OS Volume]

I have a C programm compiled with gcc in linux 32 bits without stack protectors. This program have one argument and this is a string with hexadecimal values (for send to stack for buffer overflow).

My run example is:

I'm trying to query the Search API and in the url I set responseGroup=base to limit the items in the response, but it's still sending me all 31 item properties back (vs. 12 in the base group) which consumes 4x the bandwidth and memory I require.

Here's an example of my query:

I'm debugging a simple program on gdb, and I see addresses for local variables inside the stack frame that look like the following -- 0xffffbc10, 0xffffc340, etc.

It was my understanding that kernel-space addresses take up 0xffffffff to 0xcfffffff, and that user-space addresses start at 0xbfffffff.

Why the discrepancy here?

Edit: Note that I have turned off virtual address space randomization, stack protectors, and am compiling with -m32. Here is my compile command if it helps:

gcc -m32 -z execstack -fno-stack-protector -ggdb -static test.c -o test

I'm trying to protect our Win10Pro Dell laptops using Bitlocker.
We'd like to add the initial PIN request.
We are following a lot of online articles enabling the Require additional authentication at startup key and setting Configure TPM startup Pin to Require startup PIN with TPM.
After that, I typed the command

manage-bde -protectors -add c: -TPMAndPIN

but we always receive the error:

ERROR: An error occurred (code 0x80310060): Group Policy settings do not permit the use of a PIN at startup. Please choose a different BitLocker startup option.

Other way was by the command line command:

manage-bde -on c: -UsedSpaceOnly -RecoveryPassword -RecoveryKey e: -TPMAndPIN 123456

but again the 0x80310060.