MADCAT_v2 | Universal , low interaction Honeypot | Security Testing library
kandi X-RAY | MADCAT_v2 Summary
kandi X-RAY | MADCAT_v2 Summary
in recent years, mass attacks on internet users have steadily increased. again and again new methods and patterns of attack come to light. one outstandig example was a major incident that affected 900,000 connections in germany. however, many of these attempted attacks remain undetected or are not reported, because they do not lead to a correspondingly large impairment. therefore, it is necessary to collect data on attacks and attempted attacks on the internet. a well-known and widespread means of detecting such attempted attacks are honeypots. in addition, it is also possible to collect data on the longer-term, temporal development of mass attacks and thus make better forecasts of future developments. for this purpose madcat (mass attack detection connection acceptance tools) has been developed as a universal, honeypot-like thread detetecion suite with low interaction. a honeypot is a server that simulates or emulates common network services. honeypots are used to obtain information about attack patterns and attacker behavior. if such a honeypot service is accessed, the corresponding actions are recorded and an alarm is triggered if necessary. the idea behind the operation of honeypot systems is to
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of MADCAT_v2
MADCAT_v2 Key Features
MADCAT_v2 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Security Testing
QUESTION
I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)
Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)
I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?
The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?
Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?
I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.
- I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.
So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.
Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.
If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).
Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.
You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install MADCAT_v2
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page