shareenum | Tool to enumerate shares from Windows hosts | Security Testing library

 by   CroweCybersecurity C Version: 2.0 License: GPL-3.0

kandi X-RAY | shareenum Summary

kandi X-RAY | shareenum Summary

shareenum is a C library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. shareenum has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

this is a tool that attempts to enumerate the permissions shares, directories, and files on microsoft windows systems. using an implementation of the samba (libsmbclient libraries this tool makes a smb connection to a host and recursively gathers information over the file and directory entities, compared to several other share enumeration tools that use rpc calls to gather similar information. both ways work, this was a bit easier to implement and ends up being a lot faster. usage: shareenum -o file target. | option | description | default | | --- | --- | --- | | target | full path or a file of paths to list the shares, files and directories within. can be just an ip, a hostname, or even a full path inside a share, such as smb://cool-dc.domain/netlogon. | | |-o file | file to write results to in csv format. | | |-u user
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              shareenum has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 52 star(s) with 21 fork(s). There are 9 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 8 open issues and 8 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 248 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of shareenum is 2.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              shareenum has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              shareenum has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              shareenum code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              shareenum is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.
              Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              shareenum releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of shareenum
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            shareenum Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for shareenum.

            shareenum Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for shareenum.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay
            Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

            I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

            Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

            I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

            The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

            Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

            I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

            • I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

            So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

            Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

            I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

            If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

            Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

            You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install shareenum

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Security Testing Libraries

            PayloadsAllTheThings

            by swisskyrepo

            sqlmap

            by sqlmapproject

            h4cker

            by The-Art-of-Hacking

            vuls

            by future-architect

            PowerSploit

            by PowerShellMafia

            Try Top Libraries by CroweCybersecurity

            ad-ldap-enum

            by CroweCybersecurityPython

            ps1encode

            by CroweCybersecurityRuby

            smugglebus

            by CroweCybersecurityPython

            echidna

            by CroweCybersecurityPython

            web2image

            by CroweCybersecurityPython