star | the code behind the second incarnation of jailbreakme.com

I can't decipher what you're doing there, but:

Something like this could work

The output looks oval because characters have not same width and height. Think of an image that its pixels are not square, but vertical rectangles. I borrowed the c# version of the code linked by @Prasanth Rajendran, and made some modifications:

1. added lineWidth argument
2. added xScale argument, now every 1/xScale characters in a row are equivalent to 1 data points
3. moved character position to its center, by adding a [0.5, 0.5] offset

Use inheritance very carefully. Prefer association over inheritance whenever your inheritance is not a permanent truth from the birth to the death of an object. ANd keep in mind that dependencies between classes do not make any promises about objects of those classes.

Some clarifications on the UML syntax:

• I understand that your plain thick lines ended with a small hollow triangle represent a specialization/generalization relationship (aka inheritance). If this is correct, the triangle should be larger to avoid visual confusion. Moreover multiplicity makes no sense with inheritance and should be removed.
• I understand that with the dotted line you intend to represent an association with multiplicity. If this is correct:
  • the association should be plain lines, because dotted lines are for dependencies, and multiplicity would make no sense.
  • the meaning you give to the arrow head would be unclear. Do you use them to document navigability? In case of doubt, remove them. If you want to document ownership of the association end, use the dot notation instead. (we cannot say if it’s right or wrong, since it’s a decision on how your model sees the associations)

In view of your comments and the third model linked therein, there are some key UML semantics you need to keep in mind:

• Inheritance is an ultra-strong relationship which means "is (always) a". In your example, you may say that an Actor is always a Person, and hence, everything you say about a Person is also true for an Actor. By the way, you should avoid repeating inherited properties or methods, since it could create some ambiguity.
• Inheritance is not a substitute for aggregation, composition or association. You can for example not say that a CrewMember (one person) is always a Crew (a group of persons). A CrewMember belongs to a Crew but there are things that the crew can do together that the individual member can't.
• Inheritance is not suitable if it's not always true. A Character for example may often be a Person. But not always;: you can have ghost characters, comic characters, robot characters, or animals.
• Association means that there is some structural relation between some instances of the associated classes. For example, that one ore several persons live in one city, seems a very relevant assocaition.
• Dependency means that a class is dependent on another, i.e. without the other class it would not work or something would be missing. It's a statement about the classes and not the objects. I.e. If you meant to say that Person is dependent on City you just say that the class Person would not work without knowing about City (for example, because the operation sendPostCardFrom(city: City) needs an argument of that type) but you do not say anything about persons X, Y and Z. If you want that X, Y and Z are related to city a, b, and c, you need an association.

About the model content, I'll not decide for you and there is no single truth. I therefore prefer to draw your attention at potential issues. I raise them in form of a question, up-to you to adjust the model based on your own answer:

• Common issues between the both variants:

  • Are Actor and Director really Persons ? In this case, what with the Persons that are Actors and Directors at the same time (g.g. Clint Eastwood) ? Or are Actor and Director just roles that a Persons takes for a given Movie ?
  • Is a Character really related only to 1 Movie? What to do with Indiana Jones, where the same character appears in several movies?
  • In a similar way, I wonder if there's really a single Person who lives in a City or if this should not be a many-to-many association?

• Issues regarding the differences: `

  • Is a Person in version 1 a Character (inheritance) ? Or is a Character a representation of a Person (association: represents) ?
  • Is a Character in version 2 really an Actor and by transitivity also a Person (inheritance)? Or is the Character only associated with an Actor (association: plays) ?

It's up to you to decide, but wherever I asked a question about association or inheritance, you should better think twice before using inheritance (i.e. prefer association/composition over inheritance)

Hey everyone who reads this message! I have found the solution here:

https://gist.github.com/jherax/f11d669ba286f21b7a2dcff69621eb72

It's highly likely that you will find it there too if you are brought here by the same question as above.

Split genres on |, explode it, groupby genres, and use agg as size for title and mean for rating.

I added?. before map:

In case anyone else runs into this problem.

The fix was to add a Rigidbody2D to my AI Agent and set the gravity scale to 0.

Even though my game doesn't use Unity's physics system for movement and the Astar package can move AI agents by transform, for some reason it requires a Rigidbody to keep the Z position at 0.

I'm still not really sure why this solves the problem because, when I was debugging the third-party Astar code, it always returned nextPosition values with a Z position of 0 yet the actual position that the AI Agent was updated to had varying Z positions...

If you have more info, leave a comment and I'll add it to the answer.

Try the following: