fat32 | FAT32 implement -
kandi X-RAY | fat32 Summary
kandi X-RAY | fat32 Summary
FAT32 implement
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of fat32
fat32 Key Features
fat32 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fat32
QUESTION
I am writing an UEFI application (A) which will load another UEFI application (B). This another UEFI application (B) is stored on one of the Windows Partition (FAT32). I am trying to load (B) from (A). Two things I need to perform from (A)
- First of all locate the Windows Partition (Volume) where (B) is stored.
- Load and Start Image (B).
So far I have been able to write following code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 09:08QUESTION
I have a Linux system where the disk space shows as only 29Gb, but when I look at the partition with the parted - print command it shows as a 64Gb partition. I'm not sure if the remaining disk space is unallocated, mounted in other folders, stuck in "tmpfs" or how to add it to the primary partition. This is in Ubuntu 18.04 OS. I would like for the full 64 GB to be available at root. I appreciate any help!
When I run df -h, here are the results:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 16:44Depending on the installation, the root partition might only use a part of the logical volume (LV).
Try the commands vgs
and lvs
to get information about your current setup. I assume that vgs
shows about 30G free space. You can enlarge the root volume using lvresize
. After this you need to adapt the file system. This depends on the file system type you are using. If you use extX
then you might want to run resize2fs
.
Edit based on the edited question:
Yes, everything can be done when the disk is mounted and in use.
BUT YOU NEED TO TAKE CARE ABOUT THE COMMANDS YOURSELF!!! A WRONG COMMAND MIGHT DESTROY YOUR SYSTEM.
PLEASE TAKE YOUR TIME TO MAKE YOURSELF COMFORTABLE WITH LVS BEFORE CHANGING THE SYSTEM.
There are many good tutorials which might help you, e.g.:
http://ryandoyle.net/posts/expanding-a-lvm-partition-to-fill-remaining-drive-space/
QUESTION
I am currently working on a simple operating system (GitHub: https://github.com/Nutty000/PlanetOS)
I would like to make the os work on real hardware, but I am having trouble doing it because of the file system... I want my OS to be based on the FAT32 file system, but I need to somehow not overwrite the BPB which is on the MBR. I thought about writing a program that copies the existent BPB and puts it in the beginning of my .bin bootable file, but:
I have no idea how to make that program, disk related stuff is too hard and confusing for me
The BPB is too large and if I copy it then my bootloader code wont fit in 512 bytes
I don't know what parts of the existent MBR code I should copy
I am trying to solve this for hours so excuse me if I make any grammatical mistakes.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-25 at 22:39There's no BPB in the MBR. You are mixing two types of bootsector.
The MBR (Master Boot Record) is the very first sector on the disk. It contains partition info in its partition table that starts at offset 01BEh. In this kind of bootsector, the first 446 bytes (512-64-2) are available for the bootsector program whose task it is to load the DBR.
The DBR (DOS Boot Record) is the first sector on the partition that was set bootable from the partition table. This kind of bootsector does contain a BPB (BIOS Parameter Block). For FAT32, it occupies the first 90 bytes. Considering the mandatory bootsector signature at the end, you have 420 bytes (512-90-2) available.
I have no idea how to make that program, disk related stuff is too hard and confusing for me
That's too bad for someone that wants to create their own OS.
The BPB is too large and if I copy it then my bootloader code wont fit in 512 bytes
You'll have to optimize your code for codesize. The required structures are what they are.
I don't know what parts of the existent MBR code I should copy
First copy the existing DBR from disk to a file eg. 'MyDBR.bin'. Then write your bootsector like this (FASM):
QUESTION
I am working on an app that is responsible for formatting a USB drive and prepare it for further use on an embedded system.
I am formatting the drive using the following method that I found on stack overflow (unfortunately I did not save the link. I'll post it there if I find it again)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-04 at 06:41UWP application unable to access USB drive even though permissions are set
Directory.GetFiles
can't not use to access file with path in UWP platform. And you can only use Windows Storage API to access file with path (enable broadFileSystemAccess ), by the way, System.Management Namespace
is not work for UWP platform, and if you want to format USB device within UWP app, please use desktop extension to process. for more please refer stefan' blog UWP with Desktop Extension
QUESTION
I have an embedded Linux board with 16Go eMMC flash.
When I boot the image and I run fdisk -l
I get this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-22 at 14:50You need to change the size of your partition with fdisk before using resize2fs: delete the current partition and create a new one that starts at the same block as the one you deleted.
For example:
QUESTION
I'm trying to write to physical Hard Disk (SD Card/FAT32) directly using Windows API: WriteFile() but it always fails with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (0x5). I've tried many options suggested by some other posts such as unmount/lock but nothing seems to be working.
Does anyone have a better idea what is the root cause of this and how can we access to the physical drive directly from Windows API?
This is the sample code I'm using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-03 at 21:16Thanks all for the comments.
So I figured out a way to work around this problem (in Windows 10). The workaround is to lock, dismount and create disk as GPT to make Windows think it's unallocated disk. For whatever reason if it was formatted as FAT/FAT32, I just wouldn't be able to WriteFile to the card.
The following is the example code that is working for me:
QUESTION
I spent hours trying to resolve compilation issues related to f__AnonymousType
. Seems to gets a lot of errors regarding expressions needing directives but not sure exactly what to do.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-29 at 10:00The point about anonymous type, is that you don't have to give them a name, the compiler will do it for you.
<>f__AnonymousType0
is not a valid name in user code, but looks like the name generated by the compiler. You can't use it.
Just use anonymous syntax :
QUESTION
Update: I got this working but am still not 100% sure why. I've appended the fully and consistently working script to the end for reference.
I'm trying to script a series of disk partition commands using sgdisk
and mkfs.vfat
. I'm working from a Live USB (NixOS 21pre), have a blank 1TB M.2 SSD, and am creating a 1GB EFI boot partition, and a 999GB ZFS partition.
Everything works up until I try to create a FAT32 filesystem on the EFI partition, using mkfs.vfat
, where I get the error in the title.
However, the odd thing is, the mkfs.vfat command succeeds, but throws that error anyway and blocks the rest of the script. Any idea why it's doing this and how to fix it?
Starting with an unformatted 1TB M.2 SSD:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 21:33It may take time for kernel to be notified about partition changes. Try calling partprobe
before mkfs
, to request kernel to re-read the partition tables.
QUESTION
After hours of trying I'm not able to get Manjaro (Luks, btrfs, lvm) to show up in my systemd-boot menu, and I can't figure out why.
Manjaro is set up with Luks encryption, a btrfs file system, and with LVMs. Boot manager is installed at /boot/efi
Previous to Manjaro, I was already dual booting PopOS and Windows, which were set up with systemd-boot. I have installed Manjaro with the architect image, and selected systemd-boot as the bootloader. After rebooting, the only entry that showed up was Windows. The PopOS entry I managed to fix by chroot'ing into the installation and running update-initramfs
.
What I have tried:
- Running
sudo mkinitcpio -p linux59
inside chroot - Running
sudo boot --path="/mnt/boot/efi install"
from my host (Pop) - Manually adding the file
/boot/efi/loader/entries/Manjaro.conf
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 23:13Solved the issue. As the boot files were installed in /boot, but the bootloader was installed in /boot/efi, the relative path was the latter rather than the former. Solved it by copying the boot files to a dir inside /boot/efi
QUESTION
Running the command lsblk
returns following output:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-02 at 21:40Nothing wrong per se. The boot partitions are usually separate for security and recoverability reasons (plus they sometimes need to be a "simple" filesystem type like FAT).
You can increase the size of the logical volume to the full 10T using LVM tools:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fat32
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page