loaders | Tiny loaders for various binary formats | Reverse Engineering library

next.js loads tsconfig.json for webpackConfig.resolve. See:

When a component in app-2 imports other components like import Component from "components/Component", webpack resolve components/Component according to app-1/tsconfig.json.

Solution: add a resolve plugin for app-2.

1. app-1/tsconfig.json:

1. Build the wasm itself: cargo build --target=wasm32/unknown/unknown
2. Build the JS-bindings: wasm-bindgen --out-dir=dist --target=web --omit-default-module-path my-wasm-package.wasm.
3. Consume the wasm in your worklet script like this:

Depending on the webpack version you are using to build your Storybook you need to add fs, stream and other Node core module used by Remix packages.

As a rule of thumb you can use the list from Webpack documentation on resolve.fallback here.

If you are using Stroybook with Webpack 4 the config should look like :

Judging from this issue: CSS import breaks webpack 5 compilation
I believe this is an issue with Semantic-UI-React and Webpack 5 (which is used by Create-React-App).

The final answer in that issue is a suggestion to switch to Fomantic-UI 😅

This should be reported into the upstream repo: https://github.com/Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI. The problem is that it's dead 🙄 Reasonable solution is to switch to https://github.com/fomantic/Fomantic-UI.

https://github.com/Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI-React/issues/4287#issuecomment-935897619

For my version of this error, the issue seemed to be that I was importing a file with an alias in webpack from within the same directory.

To give an example, I had this directory setup:

The question is, if no function or class is explicitly executed in Main.class, is it guaranteed that no code from Registry.class is executed?

That doesn't touch directly on class loading, but rather on class initialization, which is the first point at which any code from the class in question gets executed. Specifically, static initialization blocks and the initializers of static members are executed during this stage. The class in question must already have been loaded and verified at this point, but it might have been loaded an arbitrary amount of time earlier.

Per JLS 12.4.1,

A class or interface T will be initialized immediately before the first occurrence of any one of the following:

• T is a class and an instance of T is created.

• A static method declared by T is invoked.

• A static field declared by T is assigned.

• A static field declared by T is used and the field is not a constant variable

Thus, if you never instantiate the class or access access any of its static methods or fields (except to read a static field that is a "constant variable") then no code from the class will ever be executed.

But that a class does not get initialized does not mean that no attempt will be made to load it. The JLS does not forbid implementations from loading classes prospectively. In fact, JLS 12.2.1 specifically says:

a class loader may cache binary representations of classes and interfaces, prefetch them based on expected usage, or load a group of related classes together.

Thus, no, it is not safe to rely on the application represented by your class main.Main to run without a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError or other loading error when class windows.Registry cannot be loaded, regardless of whether it can be expected actually to be used. However, you can, under the right circumstances, rely on that class not being initialized, and therefore no code from it being executed.

As described in the AspectJ 1.9.7 release notes, due to JEP 396 you need to add --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED to your Java command line.

The problem you have when running your runMainWithError.sh script is documented in AspectJ issue #563710. There is an advice which ought to be inlined, but is not.

Looking at your around advice, I see that it proceeds, but it does not actually change any parameters or return values. So you can simply split it into a before/after-advice pair. Actually, you are not even doing anything after proceeding, so even a simple before-advice would suffice:

Your node version is lower than 12.20，Please select one of the schemes

1.Upgrade your node

npm install node@12.20.0 -g

Or the latest
npm install node@latest -g

Under Windows npm install node may note work, and you should install the latest from https://nodejs.org/en/download/ using Windows Installer (.msi)

2.Reduce the version of copy-webpack-plugin

npm install copy-webpack-plugin@9 -D

You can not turn arbitrary classes into hidden classes.

The documentation of defineHiddenClass contains the sentence

• On any attempt to resolve the entry in the run-time constant pool indicated by this_class, the symbolic reference is considered to be resolved to C and resolution always succeeds immediately.

What it doesn’t spell out explicitly is that this is the only place where a type resolution ever ends up at the hidden class.

But it has been said unambiguously in bug report JDK-8222730:

For a hidden class, its specified hidden name should only be accessible through the hidden class's 'this_class' constant pool entry.

The class should not be accessible by specifying its original name in, for example, a method or field signature even within the hidden class.

Which we can check. Even a simple case like