Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance | Speculative Store Bypass , Rogue System Register Read | Security Testing library

 by   nsacyber C Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance Summary

kandi X-RAY | Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance Summary

Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance is a C library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

Guidance for the Spectre, Meltdown, Speculative Store Bypass, Rogue System Register Read, Lazy FP State Restore, Bounds Check Bypass Store, TLBleed, and L1TF/Foreshadow vulnerabilities as well as general hardware and firmware security guidance. #nsacyber
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 575 star(s) with 129 fork(s). There are 67 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 4 open issues and 2 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 455 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance has a Non-SPDX License.
              Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance.

            Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay
            Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

            I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

            Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

            I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

            The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

            Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

            I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

            • I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

            So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

            Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

            I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

            If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

            Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

            You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/nsacyber/Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone nsacyber/Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:nsacyber/Hardware-and-Firmware-Security-Guidance.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Security Testing Libraries

            PayloadsAllTheThings

            by swisskyrepo

            sqlmap

            by sqlmapproject

            h4cker

            by The-Art-of-Hacking

            vuls

            by future-architect

            PowerSploit

            by PowerShellMafia

            Try Top Libraries by nsacyber

            WALKOFF

            by nsacyberPython

            goSecure

            by nsacyberPython

            GRASSMARLIN

            by nsacyberJava

            Event-Forwarding-Guidance

            by nsacyberPowerShell