pgbouncer | pgbouncer multhread version | SQL Database library
kandi X-RAY | pgbouncer Summary
kandi X-RAY | pgbouncer Summary
current pgbouncer is multhread version.it is modifyed basing on official pgbouncer. on the same matchine, the official pgbouncer can run 6w tps. our pgbouncer can run 20w tps. We have comercial database proxy for MySQL/PostgreSQL database, which can be a good load balancer for MySQL/PostgreSQL groups, or the SQL sharding routers transparently to you applications, or the SQL fireware to prevent your application from SQL injection hurt. For more information, please visit For any question please contact flou@onexsoft.com.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pgbouncer
pgbouncer Key Features
pgbouncer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pgbouncer
QUESTION
We have a PostgreSQL 12 cluster with one master and two slave nodes. We are using Pgpool-II to load balance our SQL queries to our cluster. Our write queries go to the master and read queries go to the slave nodes. We have a new Java application that uses HikariCP internally. So we want to disable the Pgpool-II connection pooling behaviour. As it was explained on this link we should use one connection pooling abstraction.
Not able to open connection from PgBouncer (Connection attempt timed out)
When I examine the documents, I did not see a specific key just for disabling the connection pooling behaviour.
https://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/en/html/runtime-config-connection-pooling.html.
The closest property I saw was the connection_cache (boolean) property. Is setting this property to false disables the connection pooling?
Thanks.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 06:27Correct, settings connection_cache to false will disables connection pooling and on each connection to pgpool-II from client pgpool-II create will create a new connection to backend database)
QUESTION
We have a setup where we are running 6 PgBouncer processes and our performance benchmarks degrade linearly with time. The longer PgBouncer has been running, the longer the connections to Postgres exist results in slower response times for the benchmark. We have a multi-tenant schema separated database with 2000+ relations. We are configured for Transaction Mode pooling right now. Over time, we see the memory footprint of each Postgres process climb and climb and climb, and again, this results in poorer performance.
We have tried to be more aggressive in cleaning up idle connections with the following settings:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-27 at 16:31The issue is resolved.
The application was extremely chatty and even with server_idle_timeout set as low as 5 seconds, the connections were not getting recycled on the Postgres side.
The issue we had was that server_lifetime was accidentally commented when we thought it was active and once we changed that, we could clearly see that Postgres connections were getting recycled every 2 minutes (based on our settings).
The increased memory of each connection over time especially for long-lived connections was only taking into consideration private memory and not shared memory. What we observed was the longer the connection was alive, the more memory it consumed. We tried setting things like DISCARD ALL for reset_query and it had no impact on memory consumption. Based on my research online, we were not the only to ones to face this challenge with pooling connections.
Thanks for the comments and the help. Our solution in the end was to leverage server_lifetime in pgBouncer to control the number of long-lived connections on Postgres.
-Mayan
QUESTION
I have a postgres database (version 9.2) running on Centos 6.9. I am running pgbouncer version 1.6.1
When I try connect to postgres using datagrip from my Mac, I get:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-25 at 08:52PgAdmin is not working via JDBC. So you need to configure pgBouncer to accept TCP/IP connections (see similar dba exchange question)
QUESTION
My pgbouncer.ini file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 04:39Okay, so the issue was that I was trying to log in as one of the admin_users
(aakashverma) but I hadn't mentioned them in pgbouncer_user.txt
file - my auth_file
. I only had my auth_user
in that file initially.
Mentioning them in each line in the file (just the username was enough as I'm using auth_query
) like so
QUESTION
TL;DR: update your bin/qgtunnel
.
I've recently noticed an increase in my web dyno's memory usage. After digging a bit, I could see that the LD_PRELOAD
variable that should be set with heroku-buildpack-jemalloc was not set correctly. I used a tiny script (bin/show_preload
) that helped me debug that and trace which program was overriding LD_PRELOAD
.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-12 at 14:12After reaching out to Quotaguard, they patched the qgtunnel
binary and there is no error anymore:
QUESTION
I am using this helm chart to deploy airflow https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/master/chart
Apache Airflow version: 2.0.0
Kubernetes version: v1.19.4
What happened: I get this error when try to execute tasks using kubernetes
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-11 at 17:51I think I found a root cause of this issue. In airflow helm chart I see this code:
QUESTION
I want to run php-fpm in a docker container, but get an error message after starting the container:
Fatal error: Uncaught PDOException: could not find driver.
I use php7.4 with event engine and a postgres database in a separate container (I use docker-compose to start them all) and are working on ubuntu20.04.
The weird thing is: My collegues installed the same stuff without having this error, so the error cannot come from an incorrect docker file.
What I tried so far:
- I can connect to the database with psql from the shell.
- I printed out all modules that are loaded in the container, and they include
pdo
andpdo_pgsql
.
The error refers to this method:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-15 at 13:45In your docker file try to add code below:
QUESTION
I currently have a problem with properly load balance open TCP sessions (created by the RoR application) to dynamically created Aurora Postgresql read-replicas.
The issue with this is when TCP connections are already established to one read-replica, another read-replica is created. After that traffic from the first replica will not be distributed evenly to second one, since TCP connections are already established with first replica.
Attached chart represents current infrastructure setup. Please note that between read-replicas (servers) and application (client) there is a load balancer, provided by the Aurora service, which is based on DNS round-robin.
I've tried pgbouncer, pgpool and multiple Ruby gems (makara, fresh_connection), but none of them were able to load balance nor eliminate long lived TCP connections..
I went through many articles and they helped investigate and confirm the issue; however none of them present a solution.
So... as you can see I've tried obey this problem from application and network perspective, unfortunately without luck. Has anyone had the same problem?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-01 at 16:07You could scale your load balancers along with the database instances.
QUESTION
EF registers as scoped service, which means it creates many short connections to database. One http request - one connection. PostgreSQL doesn't handle a lot of concurrent connections very well. Like a maximum of 100. Is PgBouncer needed for .NET Core applications with Entity Framework (Npgsql)? PgBouncer manages the connection pool. Or can Npgsql manage the connection pool correctly? Or is this only relevant for Python and PHP? Thanks!
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-10 at 17:06Npgsql includes its own in-process connection pool (as is common with .NET database drivers), so using an external connection pool such as PgBouncer isn't mandatory (though it can still make sense in some scenarios for pooling connections across several client machines, etc.).
QUESTION
i'm working on a chat application using django Channels
and reconnecting-web-socket the app works fine locally but when deployed to heroku
the site works fine but the web socket closes before connection is established and sometimes it works fine.
it tries to connect and says websocket open and established
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-21 at 15:06the problem was in reconnecting-web-socket.min.js changing
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pgbouncer
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page