tpl | tpl - a small binary serialization library for C | Serialization library

Suppose I have a values.yaml that contains the following arbitrary-length list of maps:

OK, so here is what I have and found (which works - however it produces a log Notice) "Only variables should be passed by reference in eval()" which is driving me absolutely crazy!

Initially like any theme region I added the regions I wanted for views use to the theme.info file.

I've created TPL Dataflow pipeline as shown below

Pandoc can use a YAML header in Markdown or a defaults or metadata file for all source types where one can store variables to use in the template. Is it possible to not escape backslashes and LaTeX commands inside these metadata variables?

For example, I'd have this line in my YAML header: phone: +49\,123\,456789. When converting, Pandoc escapes the backslashes, so it becomes +49\textbackslash,123\textbackslash,456789. This is unwanted, as I want LaTeX to interpret \, and turn it into thin spaces.

I also tried wrapping it in '' or as block with |, so YAML itself doesn't escape anything, but this seems to be Pandoc itself doing the conversion, not the YAML interpreter.

src.md:

I build a site on prestashop with a child theme based on the classic theme. For my needs i've got a page for main categories with an hero section where i display the main category name, the cover image of the category, the sub-categories and a description. (see on the attached image)

hero section

Now i need to keep this section like that when i go to the sub-category page. Keep the title, image, sub-categories, etc. Just the content must change.

For now there is my code to display this hero section, located in the layout-left-column.tpl (to be before all the main content and after the header) :

I have URL that looks like this example.com/test-page/now_here, but I want the URL to look like example.com/test-page/now-here.

I have tried the following in my .htaccess file:

I have a very simple code, I have simplified my code to help you understand the exact problem

I'm using F# and have an AsyncSeq<'t>>. Each item will take a varying amount of time to process and does I/O that's rate-limited.

I want to run all the operations in parallel and then pass them down the chain as an AsyncSeq<'t> so I can perform further manipulations on them and ultimately AsyncSeq.fold them into a final outcome.

The following AsyncSeq operations almost meet my needs:

• mapAsyncParallel - does the parallelism, but it's unconstrained, (and I don't need the order preserved)
• iterAsyncParallelThrottled - parallel and has a max degree of parallelism but doesn't let me return results (and I don't need the order preserved)

What I really need is like a mapAsyncParallelThrottled. But, to be more precise, really the operation would be entitled mapAsyncParallelThrottledUnordered.

Things I'm considering:

1. use mapAsyncParallel but use a Semaphore within the function to constrain the parallelism myself, which is probably not going to be optimal in terms of concurrency, and due to buffering the results to reorder them.
2. use iterAsyncParallelThrottled and do some ugly folding of the results into an accumulator as they arrive guarded by a lock kinda like this - but I don't need the ordering so it won't be optimal.
3. build what I need by enumerating the source and emitting results via AsyncSeqSrc like this. I'd probably have a set of Async.StartAsTask tasks in flight and start more after each Task.WaitAny gives me something to AsyncSeqSrc.put until I reach the maxDegreeOfParallelism

Surely I'm missing a simple answer and there's a better way?

Failing that, would love someone to sanity check my option 3 in either direction!

I'm open to using AsyncSeq.toAsyncEnum and then use an IAsyncEnumerable way of achieving the same outcome if that exists, though ideally without getting into TPL DataFlow or RX land if it can be avoided (I've done extensive SO searching for that without results...).

I'm browsing the .NET source code reference (https://referencesource.microsoft.com/) in an effort to find the codefiles in which keywords are defined. Specifically, I'm interested in how await in the TPL is defined/implemented, but I'd also like to browse the internal implementation of other keywords at some time.

Doing a search for the string "await" on their reference site above only returns class, property, and field names that contain the string "await" (e.g., class AwaitTaskContinuation).

I realize this seems like a basic question, but I can't find any information elsewhere on this.