czmq | High-level C binding for ØMQ
kandi X-RAY | czmq Summary
kandi X-RAY | czmq Summary
High-level C binding for ØMQ
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of czmq
czmq Key Features
czmq Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on czmq
QUESTION
I tried to use ZMQ
library in Golang and use instructions from the following page: https://zeromq.org/languages/go/. Based on the document, libsodium
, libzmq
and czmq
are dependencies.
GCC downloaded from https://jmeubank.github.io/tdm-gcc/download/ and installed in C:\gcc
.
Then for installing vcpkg
(used for installing other packages) the https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg repository is downloaded and extracted at C:\dev
directory. The following command is used for installation:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 23:34After many tries, I find out the way of installing zmq
for Go
.
First of all, I tried another GCC
software. Software downloaded from https://www.msys2.org/ and installed on C:\msys64
.
Then add C:\msys64\mingw64\bin
to PATH
environment variable of the windows.
Then run the following commands one by one.
QUESTION
Doesn't this have to work?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 13:10I am answering my own question for a complete solution pub/rec
Publisher code:
QUESTION
I am tasked with listing all unicast interfaces (IP-address & subnet via netmask (IPv4) or prefix length (IPv6)) on the local machine. Being new to win32 API, I am reading GetAdaptersAddress docs. There is an example which is quite clear:
- call
GetAdaptersAddresses
with increasing buffer size until the results fit into the allocated memory chunk - iterate over returned linked list of PIP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES (
pCurrAddresses
):- iterate over PIP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS*
pCurrAddresses->FirstUnicastAddresses
linked list to retrieve all IP addresses (SOCKET_ADDRESS and its LPSOCKADDRAddress->lpSockAddr
member); it is asockaddr_in*
orsockaddr_in6*
depending onlpSockAddr.sa_family
(AF_INET
orAF_INET6
)
- iterate over PIP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS*
At this moment, I have IP addresses.
How about netmask/prefix? This seems to be what PIP_ADAPTER_PREFIX_XP (and its SOCKET_ADDRESS Address
field) is about. That is another linked list, accessible from PIP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES
through ->FirstPrefix
.
Unhelpfully, the docs state that prefixes may not be ordered the same as addresses:
In addition, the linked IP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS structures pointed to by the FirstUnicastAddress member and the linked IP_ADAPTER_PREFIX structures pointed to by the FirstPrefix member are maintained as separate internal linked lists by the operating system. As a result, the order of linked IP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS structures pointed to by the FirstUnicastAddress member does not have any relationship with the order of linked IP_ADAPTER_PREFIX structures pointed to by the FirstPrefix member.
What is the solution? Am I missing something obvious?
Some code (e.g. zeroMQ) only uses, for each adapter, the first unicast address and the first prefix. Is that approach safe? Am I going to miss interfaces?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-14 at 17:37The IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES::FirstPrefix
field gives you a list of subnets/prefixes that are assigned to the adapter, but as the documentation states, GetAdaptersAddresses()
doesn't tell you which specific IP address on the adapter corresponds to which subnet/prefix. So, to determine each IP address's particular subnet/prefix, you have to look at the individual entries in the IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES::FirstUnicastAddresses
list.
On Windows Vista and later, the IP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS::OnLinkPrefixLength
field provides the length of the IPv4 subnet mask for an AF_INET
address, and the length of the IPv6 prefix for an AF_INET6
address. For IPv4, the length can be passed to the ConvertLengthToIpv4Mask()
function if you need the actual subnet mask.
On Windows XP, the OnLinkPrefixLength
field does not exist. Fortunately, an AF_INET
address's IPv4 subnet mask can be retrieved by calling the GetIpAddrTable()
function and then looking for the IP address in the table (in the MIB_IPADDRROW::dwAddr
field - the subnet mask will be in the MIB_IPADDRROW::dwMask
field).
I don't know how to get an AF_INET6
address's IPv6 prefix length on XP, if you need that.
QUESTION
I’d like to access the message received from an TCP peer using ZeroMQ’s ZMQ_STREAM
socket. In the following example in C, the msg
string seems to be empty:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-15 at 00:16The mock-up code has a caveat - it disobeys the published API as it never sends a single message to any peer ( because of a missing non-SNDMORE
flagged frame ever ) + better .bind()
onto an existing, reachable TCP-address ( not an emulated abstract loopback interface on 127.0.0.1 ), otherwise there would be no external peer to ever be able to initialise a communication and deliver any request to only next process the raw[]
or whatever else in the infinite while
-loop:
QUESTION
I've been banging my head on this one for some time now and hope one of you may be able to point me int he right direction.
The issue is that whenever requests are passed to the broker FAST, not all of them make it to the (single) worker.
If I introduce some delay between the requests (see sleep(1) in the client code), all works just fine, but obviously, that's not acceptable
For reproduction of an issue I am experiencing, I created this simplified version of my code:
Client:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-13 at 11:25I identified the issue. It is related to the mdp_broker. As of commit 603a304fb674733bd00c0314761242da013a327f from Sat Feb 29 10:20:52 2020, the broker does not dispatch queued requests unless there is either a "worker_ready" or a "client_request" event. So, if there are requests added to the queue while no worker is available, the total number of requests received and requests dispatched will diverge and some requests will remain in the queue unprocessed until they time out.
MDP-Broker needs to also check/dispatch any requests as soon as/as long as there are requests in the queue and a worker waiting - regardless of an incoming handle_request event.
So I added a call to s_dispatch() at the end of the handle_final() function in mdp_broker.c . It causes the broker to check for pending requests and send dispatch them, every time a worker is re-added to the list of waiting workers after it has processed a previous requests.
handle_final() in mdp_broker.c should therefore look like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install czmq
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page