FluentValidation | A library for using FluentValidation with Blazor | Frontend Framework library

 by   Blazored C# Version: v2.1.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | FluentValidation Summary

kandi X-RAY | FluentValidation Summary

FluentValidation is a C# library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework applications. FluentValidation has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A library for using FluentValidation with Blazor.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              FluentValidation has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 450 star(s) with 69 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 19 open issues and 85 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 112 days. There are 6 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of FluentValidation is v2.1.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              FluentValidation has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              FluentValidation has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              FluentValidation code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              FluentValidation is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              FluentValidation releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              FluentValidation saves you 164 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 407 lines of code, 0 functions and 12 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of FluentValidation
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            FluentValidation Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for FluentValidation.

            FluentValidation Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for FluentValidation.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Mudblazor Select with multiselect and Fluentvalidation For-Expression
            Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 06:51

            I am binding to a select field in multiselect mode and I ran into a problem with the "For" property of the select field".

            Here is a code snippet

            When using a select field an options type must be set and in this example it will be string. To make validation work the "For"-Property needs to be set and pointing to a valid property of the same type as the select fields option (and thats string). But I am expecting a multiselect, so I am binding to an IEnumerable in my model and the validation code is also set for this property. I don`t have the necessary property to bind to and even if I did, the validation would not work as expected.

            How do I make this work? I tried building a custom expression which would point to the first element of the array, but I am bad with expressions and couldn`t make it work.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-29 at 21:51

            Mudblazor snippet.

            Ok, so you can trick the component by introducing a dummy property and binding the multi-select component to it then testing its name during validation.

            When the form component passes the dummy property name to the validation method, you change the passed dummy name to the name of your collection so it's matched when fluent validation kicks in.

            Something like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71668679

            QUESTION

            FluentValidation for List parameter
            Asked 2022-Mar-29 at 15:49

            We have an existing API endpoint with a signature like the following (simplified):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-29 at 15:49

            (Found an answer shortly after posting question)

            We can achieve the validation using the derived model and a specific RuleForEach syntax:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71664992

            QUESTION

            How to validate for null more than one properties by using FluentValidator?
            Asked 2022-Mar-15 at 17:36

            Is there a way to validate for null more than one properties in a fluent manner?

            For example, without using Fluentvalidator, this may be possible by implementing IValidatableObject.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 17:36

            One possible solution:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71486426

            QUESTION

            How to Validate a list of JSON Objects using Fluent Validation and Azure Function in C#?
            Asked 2022-Mar-02 at 18:40

            I am trying to validate a list of JSON objects using Fluent Validation. I referred the official documentation https://docs.fluentvalidation.net/en/latest/collections.html as well but my function is not able to validate list of json objects

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 18:40
            Please follow the below workaround to fix your issue:

            I am slightly modified your code for my better understanding.

            MyModel.cs class

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71295864

            QUESTION

            What is the correct way to handle controller request model validation with nullable reference types?
            Asked 2022-Mar-01 at 19:22

            Say I have a request model object:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 19:08

            You have a model with an optional value. Within a user-defined method you validate that this value is defined. The compiler can't determine this behaviour and thous the warning.

            To help the compiler you could use the null-forgiving operator like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71295038

            QUESTION

            Optimising an asynchronous call in a constructor using JoinableTaskFactory.Run
            Asked 2022-Feb-14 at 13:06

            In a constructor that gets dependency injected I need to make an asynchronous call.

            (This was not originally my code. It gets used in many places. I don't think it's relevant, but this is part of an implementation for FluentValidation.AbstractValidator. The implementation of ConfigureValidationRulesAsync() is in the base class.)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 13:06

            Below is the best set of conclusions that I could derive from all the comments on the question.

            Point #1: Injection Constructors should be simple

            Injection constructors should be simple, and in the context of Fluent Validation, the MustAsync method should help to simplify asynchronous validation.

            Point #2: Warning not applicable to .NET Core

            While I can use JoinableTaskFactory, I should not be getting this warning, because the problem it is trying to solve is not applicable to .NET Core.

            Below is the description from the documentation for JoinableTaskFactory. It applies to situations where joining threads to the main thread could cause deadlocks.

            A factory for starting asynchronous tasks that can mitigate deadlocks when the tasks require the Main thread of an application and the Main thread may itself be blocking on the completion of a task.

            Thus, one can safely ignore the warning in the cases where it is simply not possible to rewrite the code. (Note the use of Task.Run(), which is the recommended way to launch a compute-bound task as of .NET Framework 4.5.)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70964917

            QUESTION

            Constraining a generic param with Either
            Asked 2022-Feb-05 at 13:16

            I am using MediatR. Requests are decorated like so

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-05 at 13:16

            The answer was (unsurprisingly) that I needed to wrap the calls with other calls rather than use the MediatR pipeline. So I created an IDispatcher interface.

            In Program.cs...

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70984368

            QUESTION

            The constraint reference 'string' could not be resolved to a type
            Asked 2022-Feb-04 at 17:47

            Good morning everybody. I am creating an application on .net 5 it was working fine til last night and now i am testing and i am receiving an error message even without any change on the code so i really don't know why.

            That is the error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Aug-16 at 15:22

            If you are using your controller something like [HttpGet("example/{param1:string}/{param2:Guid}")] then just remove :string. change it to [HttpGet("example/{param1}/{param2:Guid}")].

            And for your cors issue:-

            Use below code:-

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68804307

            QUESTION

            Serilog does not write logs to SQL Server using Serilog.Sinks.MssqlServer
            Asked 2022-Jan-27 at 04:41

            I'm trying to set up a logging mechanism using Serilog. I want to write the logs to both the file and a SQL Server database.

            Currently I can write the logs to the file system, but I cannot write to the database. I also did the same simple setup as in the Serilog documentation

            Thank you.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-27 at 04:41

            Not enough reputation for a comment, have you tried following this article? Serilog log to SQL.

            You haven't added the logging table but I'm going to assume that you followed the Sink and it resembles or is a match to this one?

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70869694

            QUESTION

            ASP.NET Core 5 -a way to check primitive datatype or change error message
            Asked 2022-Jan-01 at 21:24

            I have a small issue: I try to implement data validation in a smart way using the ApiController attribute to drop out ModelState.IsValid in every endpoint.

            But with this feature, I would want to change error message for simple primitive types as integer etc.. - maybe in different language

            Actually it looks like this:

            sample

            I also use FluentValidation but with this addon I understand that is not for simple types, but for more complex ones.

            I have no idea how I can hook this problem up.

            Hope you guys can help me.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 21:09

            with fluent validation it is absolutely possible to create validator for simple types as well such as int and string.

            You just have to write a custom validator for your object. In case you only need a simple string or int than create an object with that property for which you can write the validation.

            Take a look at this one: https://codewithmukesh.com/blog/fluent-validation-aspnet-core/

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70551777

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install FluentValidation

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Blazored/FluentValidation.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Blazored/FluentValidation

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Blazored/FluentValidation.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link