StructLayout | Visual Studio Extension for C++ struct memory layout | Code Editor library
kandi X-RAY | StructLayout Summary
kandi X-RAY | StructLayout Summary
Visual Studio Extension for C++ struct memory layout visualization.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of StructLayout
StructLayout Key Features
StructLayout Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on StructLayout
QUESTION
There is a code using the StructLayout attribute with generic as below.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-11 at 13:41This will work as expected. If you add StructLayout
which specifies a packing to a generic class, it will add a .pack
directive to the IL generated.
For example, given this class:
QUESTION
I am currently integrating the Steamworks SDK into my game and have a couple of methods which require to pass a struct as a pointer, for example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-04 at 10:12In a instance method or property of a struct
, the implicit this
parameter is a ref
managed reference. So any changes to the struct do mutate (change) the struct passed in.
Therefore, when you call the native function, you are passing an actual reference to your own struct. So it is possible for your caller to see these changes, if they have passed in a reference to their own struct. But depending on how your caller makes this call, there may be a defensive copy anyway.
For example:
QUESTION
I read some posts (that don't exist anymore) and came up with the following code that generates a PFX certificate. It works fine to the part of creating this self-signed certificate.
I'm trying to expand this to crate a self-signed certificate and from that one, create it's "childs". I tryed many things but none of then actually export the certificate with it's chain as result.
The current code get's to a point of exporting a PFX with a containing CA and importing it would include both certificates, but not associate then with each other.
It's kind of a long code, but the action should work on the last "Create" funcion of it.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 12:52I would say aim for these qualities in development certificates:
- A root certificate authority file, eg
myRoot.ca
- A password protected PKCS12 file (containing a private key + certificate), whose root is the above CA, eg
mySslCert p12
.
- The latter can also be a wildcard certificate, eg usable for multiple subdomains under
*.mycompany.com
, which is useful in terrms of simple administration.
CREATION
Personally I prefer to use OpenSSL to create certs, since this is the technology that secures the internet, and I am then sure that there is nothing technology specific about certs issued.
See my certificates repository and the makeCerts.sh
file, for sone OpenSSL commands:
- Create Root CA keypair
- Create Root certificate
- Create SSL keypair
- Create SSL certificate signing request (which can be for a wildcard certificate)
- Create SSL certificate
- Create password protected PKCS12 file
If you want to use C# to create certs, then you need to follow the same 6 steps and produce the same files. Hopefully this makes your requirements clearer.
DEPLOYMENT
In real environments these days, you may end up deploying the Root CA file (mycompany.ca.pem in my example) and the PKCS12 file (mycompany.ssl.p12 in my example).
This is quite common in Private PKI setups within a private network, so it can be very useful to simulate on a Developer PC. My .NET Example API uses the certs issued, though in some cases I use tools such as cert-manager to automate the issuing.
QUESTION
In C, if I have the following struct Data
:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 18:13Just to try it, I made a very simple project: using Pack=1
seems to pack perfectly fine to the smallest byte.
Reproducing code (on a console app):
QUESTION
I came across something very much like the below at work. I have never worked with a C# codebase that makes such heavy use of structs before.
I have used fixed before to prevent the garbage collector from moving things while I work on something unsafe using pointers. But I've never seen it used while taking a pointer and passing it to a Span like this and then using the Span outside of the fixed statement.
Is this okay? I guess since Span is managed, once we pass the location to it, then if the GC moves the location of MyStruct, it should get the new location okay right?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 11:34This is the source code in .NET 6
QUESTION
I have a C++ MFC application which consumes C# COM wrapper. The issue is whenever I invoke a function inside wrapper, I am experiencing memory leak. Can anyone explain how to clean up the allocations that are made within the C# COM wrapper.
Below code blocks mimic what I was trying to do, can anyone provide me the references/rightway to pass the structure object/ clean up the memory allocation
C# wrapper exposed as COM
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 18:41You should release memory if it's allocated and no-one else frees it, obviously. Here, the allocated memory is the .NET's string[]
and uint[]
which are represented as SAFEARRAY*
in the native world.
But, long story short: you can't really use structs as return type for COM methods. It's causes not only copy semantics issues (who owns struct's field memory, etc.), but in general, it won't even work depending on struct size, etc. lots of trouble, COM methods should return 32/64 bit-sized variables (or void).
So you can fix this using COM objects instead of structs. For example:
QUESTION
I am trying to write C# code that, running in an elevated process, creates a non-elevated process. The (only) answer to the SO question How to call CreateProcess() with STARTUPINFOEX from C# and re-parent the child contains ready-to-use code. I copied this code, but instead of creating a process, it throws an AccessViolationException. The exception text Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. does not help to identify the culprit, however from low-level debugging I can see that the processor is trying to read from memory at a very small address like 0x00000004 which, of course, goes wrong.
The code, briefly explained, retrieves a handle of the desktop process, then calls InitializeProcThreadAttributeList and UpdateProcThreadAttribute to initialize the respective fields of a STARTUPINFOEX struct which is then passed into the CreateProcess Windows API function. CreateProcess should then create the new process as a child of the desktop process.
This function expects in its 9th parameter a pointer to either a STARTUPINFO or a STARTUPINFOEX (which contains a STATUPINFO at its begin). If it's a STARTUPINFOEX, the 6th parameter should contain the EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT flag.
When I don't pass the EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT flag so that CreateProcess think it's being passed just a STARTUPINFO, all works fine except that the created process is elevated (as is the calling process). However, as soon as I add this flag, the access violation occurs. For hours I have tried modifying parameter attributes etc., but the problem persists. I have the essentially same code running in C++, so I know it can work. What am I doing wrong?
The code below doesn't contain elaborated error checking, but it should compile and demonstrate the problem out of the box.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-04 at 16:42Your call to UpdateProcThreadAttribute()
is wrong. The 4th parameter needs the address of hShellProcess
, not the value. This is even stated as much in this answer to the other question you linked to (the code in the other question has the same bug):
Second, the
lpValue
parameter of theUpdateProcThreadAttribute
function must be a pointer to the attribute value (in your case,parentHandle
), not the value itself.
The documentation for PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_PARENT_PROCESS
says:
The
lpValue
parameter is a pointer to a handle to a process to use instead of the calling process as the parent for the process being created. The process to use must have thePROCESS_CREATE_PROCESS
access right.
You said that you copied the other answer's code, but your code does not look like the other answer's code, and certainly does not contain the fix that the other answer had provided.
In your code, change this:
QUESTION
I do stuff where having contiguous data is required. Now with C# 10, we can do public readonly record struct
.
I like having the automatic ToString feature that records have, among others, so having that done for me is nice.
As such, are the following equivalent?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-19 at 06:30record
isn't a new type, it's specific behavior applied to reference and now value types. The struct remains a struct. You can test this at sharplab.io, to see the code generated by the compiler in each case.
A record uses properties though, not raw fields, so you can only compare structs with properties to record structs. That's the important difference
This struct:
QUESTION
I am trying to add getters and setters to this struct, so I can use it as a listView items source. The problem is, this causes MarshalAs to be invalid thus not allowing compilation. What would the best option be to fix this?
...Attribute 'MarshalAs' is not valid on this declaration type. It is only valid on 'field, parameter, return' declarations.**
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 03:03You can specify the underlying field as the target of the attribute
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement my own async method builder for a custom awaitable type. My awaitable type is just a struct containing a ValueTask
.
The problem is my asynchronous method builder only works when it's a class
or compiled in Debug mode, not a struct
and in Release mode.
Here's a minimal, reproducible example. You have to copy this code into a new console project on your local PC and run it in Release mode; .NET Fiddle apparently runs snippets in Debug mode. And of course this requires .Net 5+: https://dotnetfiddle.net/S6F9Hd
This code completes successfully when CustomAwaitableAsyncMethodBuilder
is a class or it is compiled in Debug mode. But it hangs and fails to complete otherwise:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 19:46Found it! If you use ILSpy to disassemble the .dll compiled from the question's code (use the .NET Fiddle link and follow the question's instructions), and then turn ILSpy's language version down to C# 4 (which was the version before async/await was introduced), then you'll see that this is how the GetValueAsync
method is implemented:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install StructLayout
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page