StructLayout | Visual Studio Extension for C++ struct memory layout | Code Editor library

 by   Viladoman C# Version: v0.6.2 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | StructLayout Summary

kandi X-RAY | StructLayout Summary

StructLayout is a C# library typically used in Editor, Code Editor, Visual Studio Code applications. StructLayout has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Visual Studio Extension for C++ struct memory layout visualization.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              StructLayout has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 409 star(s) with 14 fork(s). There are 14 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 11 open issues and 23 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 39 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of StructLayout is v0.6.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              StructLayout has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              StructLayout has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              StructLayout code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              StructLayout is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              StructLayout releases are available to install and integrate.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of StructLayout
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            StructLayout Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for StructLayout.

            StructLayout Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for StructLayout.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Does work the StructLayout attribute with generic in C#?
            Asked 2022-Apr-11 at 13:41

            There is a code using the StructLayout attribute with generic as below.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-11 at 13:41

            This will work as expected. If you add StructLayout which specifies a packing to a generic class, it will add a .pack directive to the IL generated.

            For example, given this class:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71827778

            QUESTION

            Is it safe to pass a struct with "ref this" to native code
            Asked 2022-Mar-04 at 10:12

            I am currently integrating the Steamworks SDK into my game and have a couple of methods which require to pass a struct as a pointer, for example:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-04 at 10:12

            In a instance method or property of a struct, the implicit this parameter is a ref managed reference. So any changes to the struct do mutate (change) the struct passed in.

            Therefore, when you call the native function, you are passing an actual reference to your own struct. So it is possible for your caller to see these changes, if they have passed in a reference to their own struct. But depending on how your caller makes this call, there may be a defensive copy anyway.

            For example:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71336085

            QUESTION

            Export Certificate as PFX with proper chain of signing
            Asked 2022-Jan-10 at 17:12

            I read some posts (that don't exist anymore) and came up with the following code that generates a PFX certificate. It works fine to the part of creating this self-signed certificate.

            I'm trying to expand this to crate a self-signed certificate and from that one, create it's "childs". I tryed many things but none of then actually export the certificate with it's chain as result.

            The current code get's to a point of exporting a PFX with a containing CA and importing it would include both certificates, but not associate then with each other.

            It's kind of a long code, but the action should work on the last "Create" funcion of it.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 12:52

            I would say aim for these qualities in development certificates:

            • A root certificate authority file, eg myRoot.ca
            • A password protected PKCS12 file (containing a private key + certificate), whose root is the above CA, eg mySslCert p12.
            • The latter can also be a wildcard certificate, eg usable for multiple subdomains under *.mycompany.com, which is useful in terrms of simple administration.

            CREATION

            Personally I prefer to use OpenSSL to create certs, since this is the technology that secures the internet, and I am then sure that there is nothing technology specific about certs issued.

            See my certificates repository and the makeCerts.sh file, for sone OpenSSL commands:

            • Create Root CA keypair
            • Create Root certificate
            • Create SSL keypair
            • Create SSL certificate signing request (which can be for a wildcard certificate)
            • Create SSL certificate
            • Create password protected PKCS12 file

            If you want to use C# to create certs, then you need to follow the same 6 steps and produce the same files. Hopefully this makes your requirements clearer.

            DEPLOYMENT

            In real environments these days, you may end up deploying the Root CA file (mycompany.ca.pem in my example) and the PKCS12 file (mycompany.ssl.p12 in my example).

            This is quite common in Private PKI setups within a private network, so it can be very useful to simulate on a Developer PC. My .NET Example API uses the certs issued, though in some cases I use tools such as cert-manager to automate the issuing.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70393039

            QUESTION

            Memory layout of C# array of struct
            Asked 2022-Jan-07 at 18:36

            In C, if I have the following struct Data:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 18:13

            Just to try it, I made a very simple project: using Pack=1 seems to pack perfectly fine to the smallest byte.

            Reproducing code (on a console app):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70624945

            QUESTION

            Returning Span from a Property With Unsafe and Fixed
            Asked 2021-Dec-19 at 11:34

            I came across something very much like the below at work. I have never worked with a C# codebase that makes such heavy use of structs before.

            I have used fixed before to prevent the garbage collector from moving things while I work on something unsafe using pointers. But I've never seen it used while taking a pointer and passing it to a Span like this and then using the Span outside of the fixed statement.

            Is this okay? I guess since Span is managed, once we pass the location to it, then if the GC moves the location of MyStruct, it should get the new location okay right?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 11:34

            This is the source code in .NET 6

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70404914

            QUESTION

            How to fix memory leak when passing object from C# COM library to a C++ application
            Asked 2021-Dec-16 at 18:41

            I have a C++ MFC application which consumes C# COM wrapper. The issue is whenever I invoke a function inside wrapper, I am experiencing memory leak. Can anyone explain how to clean up the allocations that are made within the C# COM wrapper.

            Below code blocks mimic what I was trying to do, can anyone provide me the references/rightway to pass the structure object/ clean up the memory allocation

            C# wrapper exposed as COM

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 18:41

            You should release memory if it's allocated and no-one else frees it, obviously. Here, the allocated memory is the .NET's string[] and uint[] which are represented as SAFEARRAY* in the native world.

            But, long story short: you can't really use structs as return type for COM methods. It's causes not only copy semantics issues (who owns struct's field memory, etc.), but in general, it won't even work depending on struct size, etc. lots of trouble, COM methods should return 32/64 bit-sized variables (or void).

            So you can fix this using COM objects instead of structs. For example:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70362365

            QUESTION

            Access violation calling CreateProcess in C#
            Asked 2021-Nov-04 at 16:42

            I am trying to write C# code that, running in an elevated process, creates a non-elevated process. The (only) answer to the SO question How to call CreateProcess() with STARTUPINFOEX from C# and re-parent the child contains ready-to-use code. I copied this code, but instead of creating a process, it throws an AccessViolationException. The exception text Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. does not help to identify the culprit, however from low-level debugging I can see that the processor is trying to read from memory at a very small address like 0x00000004 which, of course, goes wrong.

            The code, briefly explained, retrieves a handle of the desktop process, then calls InitializeProcThreadAttributeList and UpdateProcThreadAttribute to initialize the respective fields of a STARTUPINFOEX struct which is then passed into the CreateProcess Windows API function. CreateProcess should then create the new process as a child of the desktop process.

            This function expects in its 9th parameter a pointer to either a STARTUPINFO or a STARTUPINFOEX (which contains a STATUPINFO at its begin). If it's a STARTUPINFOEX, the 6th parameter should contain the EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT flag.

            When I don't pass the EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT flag so that CreateProcess think it's being passed just a STARTUPINFO, all works fine except that the created process is elevated (as is the calling process). However, as soon as I add this flag, the access violation occurs. For hours I have tried modifying parameter attributes etc., but the problem persists. I have the essentially same code running in C++, so I know it can work. What am I doing wrong?

            The code below doesn't contain elaborated error checking, but it should compile and demonstrate the problem out of the box.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-04 at 16:42

            Your call to UpdateProcThreadAttribute() is wrong. The 4th parameter needs the address of hShellProcess, not the value. This is even stated as much in this answer to the other question you linked to (the code in the other question has the same bug):

            Second, the lpValue parameter of the UpdateProcThreadAttribute function must be a pointer to the attribute value (in your case, parentHandle), not the value itself.

            The documentation for PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_PARENT_PROCESS says:

            The lpValue parameter is a pointer to a handle to a process to use instead of the calling process as the parent for the process being created. The process to use must have the PROCESS_CREATE_PROCESS access right.

            You said that you copied the other answer's code, but your code does not look like the other answer's code, and certainly does not contain the fix that the other answer had provided.

            In your code, change this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69836929

            QUESTION

            Do C#10’s readonly record structs guarantee the same size and alignment of fields as the explicit implementation?
            Asked 2021-Oct-19 at 06:30

            I do stuff where having contiguous data is required. Now with C# 10, we can do public readonly record struct.

            I like having the automatic ToString feature that records have, among others, so having that done for me is nice.

            As such, are the following equivalent?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-19 at 06:30

            record isn't a new type, it's specific behavior applied to reference and now value types. The struct remains a struct. You can test this at sharplab.io, to see the code generated by the compiler in each case.

            A record uses properties though, not raw fields, so you can only compare structs with properties to record structs. That's the important difference

            This struct:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69607592

            QUESTION

            MarshalAs for Properties in a struct
            Asked 2021-Oct-05 at 03:07

            I am trying to add getters and setters to this struct, so I can use it as a listView items source. The problem is, this causes MarshalAs to be invalid thus not allowing compilation. What would the best option be to fix this?

            Attribute 'MarshalAs' is not valid on this declaration type. It is only valid on 'field, parameter, return' declarations.**

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 03:03

            You can specify the underlying field as the target of the attribute

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69444352

            QUESTION

            Why does my async method builder have to be a class or run in Debug mode?
            Asked 2021-Sep-30 at 19:46

            I'm trying to implement my own async method builder for a custom awaitable type. My awaitable type is just a struct containing a ValueTask.

            The problem is my asynchronous method builder only works when it's a class or compiled in Debug mode, not a struct and in Release mode.

            Here's a minimal, reproducible example. You have to copy this code into a new console project on your local PC and run it in Release mode; .NET Fiddle apparently runs snippets in Debug mode. And of course this requires .Net 5+: https://dotnetfiddle.net/S6F9Hd

            This code completes successfully when CustomAwaitableAsyncMethodBuilder is a class or it is compiled in Debug mode. But it hangs and fails to complete otherwise:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 19:46

            Found it! If you use ILSpy to disassemble the .dll compiled from the question's code (use the .NET Fiddle link and follow the question's instructions), and then turn ILSpy's language version down to C# 4 (which was the version before async/await was introduced), then you'll see that this is how the GetValueAsync method is implemented:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69396896

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install StructLayout

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            Configurations and OptionsWorking Unreal Engine 4Building the VSIX
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Viladoman/StructLayout.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Viladoman/StructLayout

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Viladoman/StructLayout.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link