spdif-ka | SPDIF Keep Alive utility | Audio Utils library
kandi X-RAY | spdif-ka Summary
kandi X-RAY | spdif-ka Summary
Windows-based .net GUI application used for keeping the S/PDIF connection alive when no sound is playing. Some sound cards will stop the S/PDIF link when no sound is actively being played. When a sound is eventually played, there is roughly a 500ms delay in reconnecting the link thereby causing some audio sounds to be missed or a perceived cutoff of sound. By running spdif-ka, this problem no longer ocurres.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of spdif-ka
spdif-ka Key Features
spdif-ka Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on spdif-ka
QUESTION
I'm trying to understand why the commit history that I can see in Visual Studio 2017 for a particular git repo doesn't match what is shown as the commit history for the same repo on GitHub.
In particular, I'm looking at the commit history located here: https://github.com/handruin/spdif-ka/commits/master
As you can see, between March 27 and May 31 there are 9 commits listed.
In Visual Studio I have that repo configured as the upstream remote and I've done a fetch to get fully up-to-date with it. The latest commit identifier matches with the one on GitHub for that branch.
But for some reason, when I do 'View History' on that master branch in Visual Studio, I see only 5 commits between those dates, not 9. Please see the attached screenshot.
Does anybody know why I'm only seeing 5 of the commits in Visual Studio whereas 9 commits are listed on GitHub?
EDIT: here is a larger screenshot, where I've also included a window showing the configuration of my upstream remote, the one that I'm showing the history for.
I see that the missing commits are actually present, they're just much further down in the list. So I guess it's more a question of why the presentation of the order is so different between this history window versus what is shown on GitHub. And is there a way to make them display the commits in the same order?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-25 at 14:06The page I was looking at on GitHub, showing the commits for a particular branch, shows a flat commit list. When viewing the history of that same branch in Visual Studio a graph is shown, with nodes illustrating all of the associated branching and merging activity. That's why the order is different. To see a very similar view in GitHub, it is necessary to click on the 'Insights' tab and then on 'Network'.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install spdif-ka
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page