example | Example repo of Obfuscar | Code Editor library

 by   obfuscar C# Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | example Summary

kandi X-RAY | example Summary

example is a C# library typically used in Editor, Code Editor applications. example has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This repo uses Visual Studio 2017 to demonstrate how to use Obfuscar 2.2.11. The obfuscated assemblies are in the output folder (.\BasicExampleExe\bin\Debug\Obfuscator_Output or .\BasicExampleExe\bin\Release\Obfuscator_Output). Obfuscar Source Code can be found at [GitHub] The documentation is hosted at [ReadTheDocs] To test the example on macOS or Linux, please refer to
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              example has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 29 star(s) with 15 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 2 open issues and 9 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 23 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of example is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              example has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              example has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              example code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              example does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              example releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              example saves you 6 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 18 lines of code, 0 functions and 14 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of example
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            example Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for example.

            example Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for example.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How do purely functional languages handle index-based algorithms?
            Asked 2022-Apr-05 at 12:51

            I have been trying to learn about functional programming, but I still struggle with thinking like a functional programmer. One such hangup is how one would implement index-heavy operations which rely strongly on loops/order-of-execution.

            For example, consider the following Java code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 21:17

            This is not an index-heavy operation, in fact you can do this with a one-liner with scanl1 :: (a -> a -> a) -> [a] -> [a]:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71387267

            QUESTION

            Can a function and local variable have the same name?
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 08:41

            Here's an example of what I mean:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-16 at 10:38

            foo = 5 creates a local variable inside your function. def foo creates a global variable. That's why they can both have the same name.

            If you refer to foo inside your foo() function, you're referring to the local variable. If you refer to foo outside that function, you're referring to the global variable.

            Since it evidently causes confusion for people trying to follow the code, you probably shouldn't do this.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70377512

            QUESTION

            Springboot 2.6.0 / Spring fox 3 - Failed to start bean 'documentationPluginsBootstrapper'
            Asked 2022-Mar-25 at 06:14

            I'm trying to initiate a Springboot project using Open Jdk 15, Springboot 2.6.0, Springfox 3. We are working on a project that replaced Netty as the webserver and used Jetty instead because we do not need a non-blocking environment.

            In the code we depend primarily on Reactor API (Flux, Mono), so we can not remove org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webflux dependencies.

            I replicated the problem that we have in a new project.: https://github.com/jvacaq/spring-fox.

            I figured out that these lines in our build.gradle file are the origin of the problem.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 12:36

            This problem's caused by a bug in Springfox. It's making an assumption about how Spring MVC is set up that doesn't always hold true. Specifically, it's assuming that MVC's path matching will use the Ant-based path matcher and not the PathPattern-based matcher. PathPattern-based matching has been an option for some time now and is the default as of Spring Boot 2.6.

            As described in Spring Boot 2.6's release notes, you can restore the configuration that Springfox assumes will be used by setting spring.mvc.pathmatch.matching-strategy to ant-path-matcher in your application.properties file. Note that this will only work if you are not using Spring Boot's Actuator. The Actuator always uses PathPattern-based parsing, irrespective of the configured matching-strategy. A change to Springfox will be required if you want to use it with the Actuator in Spring Boot 2.6 and later.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70036953

            QUESTION

            Error: [PrivateRoute] is not a component. All component children of must be a or
            Asked 2022-Mar-24 at 16:08

            I'm using React Router v6 and am creating private routes for my application.

            In file PrivateRoute.js, I've the code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-12 at 21:20

            I ran into the same issue today and came up with the following solution based on this very helpful article by Andrew Luca

            In PrivateRoute.js:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69864165

            QUESTION

            Is if(A | B) always faster than if(A || B)?
            Asked 2022-Feb-11 at 05:03

            I am reading this book by Fedor Pikus and he has some very very interesting examples which for me were a surprise.
            Particularly this benchmark caught me, where the only difference is that in one of them we use || in if and in another we use |.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 19:57

            Code readability, short-circuiting and it is not guaranteed that Ord will always outperform a || operand. Computer systems are more complicated than expected, even though they are man-made.

            There was a case where a for loop with a much more complicated condition ran faster on an IBM. The CPU didn't cool and thus instructions were executed faster, that was a possible reason. What I am trying to say, focus on other areas to improve code than fighting small-cases which will differ depending on the CPU and the boolean evaluation (compiler optimizations).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71039947

            QUESTION

            How did print(*a, a.pop(0)) change?
            Asked 2022-Feb-04 at 21:21

            This code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-04 at 21:21

            I suspect this may have been an accident, though I prefer the new behavior.

            The new behavior is a consequence of a change to how the bytecode for * arguments works. The change is in the changelog under Python 3.9.0 alpha 3:

            bpo-39320: Replace four complex bytecodes for building sequences with three simpler ones.

            The following four bytecodes have been removed:

            • BUILD_LIST_UNPACK
            • BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK
            • BUILD_SET_UNPACK
            • BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK_WITH_CALL

            The following three bytecodes have been added:

            • LIST_TO_TUPLE
            • LIST_EXTEND
            • SET_UPDATE

            On Python 3.8, the bytecode for f(*a, a.pop()) looks like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70404485

            QUESTION

            What's the mathematical reason behind Python choosing to round integer division toward negative infinity?
            Asked 2022-Jan-30 at 01:29

            I know Python // rounds towards negative infinity and in C++ / is truncating, rounding towards 0.

            And here's what I know so far:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-18 at 21:46

            Although I can't provide a formal definition of why/how the rounding modes were chosen as they were, the citation about compatibility with the % operator, which you have included, does make sense when you consider that % is not quite the same thing in C++ and Python.

            In C++, it is the remainder operator, whereas, in Python, it is the modulus operator – and, when the two operands have different signs, these aren't necessarily the same thing. There are some fine explanations of the difference between these operators in the answers to: What's the difference between “mod” and “remainder”?

            Now, considering this difference, the rounding (truncation) modes for integer division have to be as they are in the two languages, to ensure that the relationship you quoted, (m/n)*n + m%n == m, remains valid.

            Here are two short programs that demonstrate this in action (please forgive my somewhat naïve Python code – I'm a beginner in that language):

            C++:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70730831

            QUESTION

            Error about Android Studio on Macbook M1: An error occurred while trying to compute required packages
            Asked 2022-Jan-16 at 04:00

            I've downloaded Android Studio from the official website, the one for M1 chip (arm).

            Basically running it for the first time, the error is the following:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-07 at 09:40

            This is what solved it for me on my M1.

            1. Go to Android Studio Preview and download the latest Canary build for Apple chip (Chipmunk). Don't worry this is just to get through the initial setup.
            2. Unpack it, run it, let it install all the SDK components, accept licenses, etc as usual.
            3. Once it's done, simply close it and delete it.

            Now when you start your stable Android Studio (Arctic Fox) you should not see the error.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69869181

            QUESTION

            Why does iteration over an inclusive range generate longer assembly in Rust?
            Asked 2022-Jan-15 at 11:19

            These two loops are equivalent in C++ and Rust:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 10:20

            Overflow in the iterator state.

            The C++ version will loop forever when given a large enough input:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70672533

            QUESTION

            Why does Math.min() return -0 from [+0, 0, -0]
            Asked 2021-Dec-23 at 08:22

            I know (-0 === 0) comes out to be true. I am curious to know why -0 < 0 happens?

            When I run this code in stackoverflow execution context, it returns 0.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-22 at 14:17

            This is a specialty of Math.min, as specified:

            21.3.2.25 Math.min ( ...args )

            [...]

            1. For each element number of coerced, do

            a. If number is NaN, return NaN.

            b. If number is -0𝔽 and lowest is +0𝔽, set lowest to -0𝔽.

            c. If number < lowest, set lowest to number.

            1. Return lowest.

            Note that in most cases, +0 and -0 are treated equally, also in the ToString conversion, thus (-0).toString() evaluates to "0". That you can observe the difference in the browser console is an implementation detail of the browser.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70450352

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install example

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/obfuscar/example.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone obfuscar/example

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:obfuscar/example.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link