xDav | A .Net Module For WebDav | File Utils library
kandi X-RAY | xDav Summary
kandi X-RAY | xDav Summary
xDav is .net server mudole for webdav standard . its allow you to handle your webdav requests easily.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of xDav
xDav Key Features
xDav Examples and Code Snippets
const linearSearch = (arr, item) => {
for (const i in arr) {
if (arr[i] === item) return +i;
}
return -1;
};
linearSearch([2, 9, 9], 9); // 1
linearSearch([2, 9, 9], 7); // -1
def linear_model(features,
feature_columns,
units=1,
sparse_combiner='sum',
weight_collections=None,
trainable=True,
cols_to_vars=None):
"""Return
def noisy_linear_cosine_decay(learning_rate,
global_step,
decay_steps,
initial_variance=1.0,
variance_decay=0.55,
def linear_cosine_decay(learning_rate,
global_step,
decay_steps,
num_periods=0.5,
alpha=0.0,
beta=0.001,
n
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on xDav
QUESTION
Okay so, I’m using sockets to receive data from instagram. I’ve been working on this for around a day now and this keeps happening and I can’t fix it after around 3 hours of trying. I can not show the header information since it has cookies that can be used to impersonate me but I can show the data response since I know what it should be, it’s just a bunch of hexadecimal, specifically this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-26 at 23:16This seems like GZIP-compressed data, with the first byte missing which I'd expect to be 1F
. This is an educated guess because 1F 8B 08
is the header of GZIP and unexpected compression is often the source of this sort of surprise.
Check the Content-Encoding
header in the response, I bet it is gzip
.
You can try sending a request header Accept-Encoding: identity
to say that the only encoding you'd accept is identity
(which is no encoding at all). It's possible that the webserver ignores that though, in that case you'd have to decompress the response yourself.
QUESTION
While hand-writing DNS messages from scratch, I am able to send out TXT records upto 255 chars with this pseudo C code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-30 at 02:57You can't return a text fragment longer than 255 bytes these are not allowed by the DNS format.
SPF allows splitting the record into fragments. according to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-3.3 you can split the string at any position as the fragment boundaries are not syntactically significant, most humans will split between clauses, but there is no requirement to do so.
When returning multiple text fragments just concatenate them same as is done for domain names. The RFC is silent on splits that cut the signature "v=spf1 " so keep the first segment at no less than 7 bytes in length.
[length1-byte] "string of length1" [length2-byte] "string-of-length2"
Multiple fragments may be used even when the total length is less than 255.
Be sure to include the length bytes in the calculation of rdlen
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install xDav
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page