Flurl | Fluent URL builder and testable HTTP client for NET | HTTP Client library
kandi X-RAY | Flurl Summary
kandi X-RAY | Flurl Summary
Flurl is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Flurl
Flurl Key Features
Flurl Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Flurl
QUESTION
Currently I have working code which uses Flurl
to issue http post request to my endpoint.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-08 at 09:38mulipart/form-data
requests will be supported in Flurl.Http 1.0 via the following syntax:
QUESTION
I'm trying to write a call to the Freshdesk API using either Flurl or RestSharp library.
The API call I'm trying to write is Creating a Ticket: https://developers.freshdesk.com/api/#create_ticket
An example of cURL:
curl -v -u yourapikey:X -F "attachments[]=@/path/to/attachment1.ext" -F "attachments[]=@/path/to/attachment2.ext" -F "email=example@example.com" -F "subject=Ticket Title" -F "description=this is a sample ticket" -X POST 'https://domain.freshdesk.com/api/v2/tickets'
Note params are passed by -F
(i.e. --form
) flag.
With the following code calling Flurl:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-12 at 09:26It's the FreshDesk API issue. They want, for some reason, for multipart form-data parameter names to be enclosed in quotation marks. It's not a requirement per HTTP standards. RestSharp and Flurl use MultipartFormDataContent
, and it adds uses parameter names as provided.
Following up on your issue, I added this property to RestRequest
:
QUESTION
Let's say I have a simple service that's registered as a Transient
in Startup
, and I use Flurl like so:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 19:35According to their docs: yes - the default usage, as you are showing, makes uses of the implementation guidelines provided by Microsoft:
Quote:
Flurl.Http is built on top of the System.Net.Http stack. If you're familiar with HttpClient, you probably already know this advice:
HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and re-used throughout the life of an application. Especially in server applications, creating a new HttpClient instance for every request will exhaust the number of sockets available under heavy loads. This will result in SocketException errors.
Flurl.Http adheres to this guidance by default. Fluent methods like this will create an HttpClient lazily, cache it, and reuse it for every call to the same host*:
Sources:
https://flurl.dev/docs/client-lifetime/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient?view=net-6.0#remarks
Keep in mind though - "heavy load" can still mean you'll hit certain limits like:
- reaching maximum server connections - i.e.: possible server overload
- reaching maximum client socket usage - i.e.: initiating too many concurrent connections
For more info see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclienthandler.maxconnectionsperserver?view=net-6.0
This means you'll still need to do a sanity check on the amount of connections you'll be expecting.
QUESTION
After successfully Authenticated using MSAL. I get the token and passed it on the Flurl. I'm getting 500 error. But if I test it on Postman it works properly. Anything I missed?
Below is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 07:51QUESTION
When using IObservable.LastAsync()
to force my console app to wait on the result of an API call using Flurl, that API call is never made and the main thread deadlocks and never returns from LastAsync()
. My goals are:
- Since this is a console app, I can't really "subscribe" to the API call since that would allow the main thread to continue, likely causing it to exit prior to the API call completing. So I need to block until the value is obtained.
- The API call should be deferred until the first subscriber requests a value.
- Second and onward subscribers should not cause another API call, instead the last value from the stream should be returned (this is the goal of using
Replay(1)
)
Here is an example that reproduces the issue:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-29 at 16:35Replay
returns "connectable" observable, and you need to call Connect()
method on it to start it going. Without that call, it does not subscribe to the underlying observable and does not emit items to its own subscribers, so that's why you have a "deadlock".
In this case instead of manually connecting, you can use RefCount()
extension method which will automatically connect it on first subscriber and disconnect on when last subscriber unsubscribes. So:
QUESTION
An API I depend on (that I have no control over) previously took a JSON structure like so:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-15 at 07:29You can solve this problem in the following way:
Let's suppose you have defined the different payload classes like this:
QUESTION
I'm fairly new to deal with x-www-form-urlencoded
message. However I encountered an different encoding with PostUrlEncodedAsync
that I used in Flurl HTTP to encoded whitespace as +
, yet if I used other urlencoding it would use %20
e.g item_name: Test Purchase
From Flurl: Test+Purchase
From other UrlEncoded: Test%20Purchase
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-01 at 14:39Either encoding should work, but historically +
is and always has been the dominant implementation for x-www-form-urlencoded
, so this is how Flurl does it. See discussion here.
QUESTION
Main service implementation using flurl
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-09 at 14:27I think the problem is the arrange step of your test:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-02 at 16:46multipart/form-data
!= JSON, so don't use PostJsonAsync
. Use PostMultipartAsync
. This is documented here. Here's the relevant change to what you have:
QUESTION
I am looking to switch our HttpClients to use Flurl. However, our HttpClient is currently configured to use Service Discovery via Steeltoe. Basically it's doing this in ConfigureServices:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-09 at 14:22There's a few ways to add a custom message handler with Flurl (such as with a custom factory), but since you're already using IHttpClientFactory
, I think the easiest path to get what you want (and the one I'd recommend) is to continue injecting HttpClient
into your services as you're doing and wrap them with Flurl inside the service:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Flurl
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page