mocka | Simple , elegant content placeholder | Frontend Framework library

by Chalarangelo CSS Version: v1.0.2 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | mocka Summary

mocka is a CSS library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, Vue applications. mocka has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

The mocka placeholder is a very simple content placeholder that you can use for your website or web application, while loading your page's content. It weighs very little (about 500 bytes minified and gzipped), is fully customizable and you can easily include it in your project's CSS file, by using the Sass mixin provided. Alternatively, you can copy its code and inline it in your HTML for even faster loading.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

mocka has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 1195 star(s) with 41 fork(s). There are 14 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 1 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of mocka is v1.0.2

Quality

mocka has no bugs reported.

Security

mocka has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

mocka is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

mocka releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mocka

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

mocka Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for mocka.

mocka Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for mocka.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on mocka

How to mock a full module?

PHP Unit Test Mocking a member variable dependency

Is it possible to force some functions to use different class during testing?

How to run the same google test case with different google mocks?

TypeError when passing mocked object to parent constructor with PHPUnit

Why don't null Mock objects throw NullPointerException?

Spring Bean override with annotations in parent-child relationship

@InjectMocks inject @MockBean by Constructor and setter not working properly

Static pointer to this defined inside class for mock for googletest

QUESTION

How to mock a full module?

Asked 2021-Apr-13 at 14:39

I have a module B that I want to test. This module depends on the module A that I don't want to test. Here is an example of my package B:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-13 at 11:23

It is possible to redefine the subs defined in the package A by the subs in MockA. To do that, there are three conditions:

MockA must define the same package than A;
MockA must be included after all the inclusions of A;
The warning redefine must not be fatal.

The file MockA.pm can be the following:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67073926

QUESTION

PHP Unit Test Mocking a member variable dependency

Asked 2020-Nov-17 at 16:00

Hello lets say I want to test the function run from Class A and I'm using Mockery to mock external dependencies:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-17 at 16:00

Don't mock the thing you are testing. Inject the mocked B into A.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64877107

QUESTION

Asked 2020-Oct-23 at 14:15

I'm in the process of upgrading our Autofac.Extras.Moq library to the latest version (6.0.0) within our Unit Test project. After upgrading, I noticed tests using: var mock = AutoMock.GetLoose(), no longer supported the "Provide" method. So I started digging into the documentation for some sort of workaround.

After taking a look at the Getting Started docs (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/v5.2.0/integration/moq.html#getting-started) I've noticed there is a new way of registering mocks and dependent services using AutoMock.GetLoose(cfg => cfg.RegisterMock(mockA)). However, some of our tests require more than one Mock injected, and it's not clear to me how to do this. Take for example:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-23 at 14:15

Have you tried putting both registrations in the GetLoose lambda?

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64475835

QUESTION

Is it possible to force some functions to use different class during testing?

Asked 2020-Jul-17 at 01:15

I have class with few methods. Let's say A

file a.py

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jul-16 at 16:23

sample_function uses whatever A is bound to in the global namespace of the module functions. You can rebind your own class to that name.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62939096

QUESTION

How to run the same google test case with different google mocks?

Asked 2020-Jun-18 at 08:08

There are several test cases which was using a service. The test cases are written with google test. The service can be of different types, so I have mocked each one with google mock. How do I write the tests in such a way so they can be run with different mocks without writing the same tests again and again with different mocks?

The same test case for 2 different mocks are written like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jun-15 at 08:09

If you use GoogleMock framework to create and control mocks during the tests' execution, you can specify (using e.g. EXPECT_CALLS) how the mock should behave.

The object under tests shouldn't care about what type of mock is used in given tests if you use Dependency Inversion Principle from SOLID (i.e. there should be no code that depend on mock type in the class under test; the tested class should depend on interface, not concrete implementation)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62372838

QUESTION

TypeError when passing mocked object to parent constructor with PHPUnit

Asked 2020-May-15 at 05:39

In my project, I have the following structure where Foo (subject of tests) inherit ParentFoo and A implements AInterface.

The ParentFoo constructor receives an instance of AInterface. The Foo constructor needs to execute some code and receive an instance of A.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-15 at 05:39

I cannot reproduce your problem:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61803783

QUESTION

Why don't null Mock objects throw NullPointerException?

Asked 2020-Jan-22 at 23:11

I have a piece of code that looks like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-22 at 23:11

With :

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59853559

QUESTION

Spring Bean override with annotations in parent-child relationship

Asked 2019-Nov-13 at 16:42

I have a two classes which are in a parent-child relation, the second one being a mock of the first.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Nov-13 at 15:43

You can use profiles.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58840244

QUESTION

@InjectMocks inject @MockBean by Constructor and setter not working properly

Asked 2019-Nov-13 at 12:56

I have try so many time by unsing @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) I have tried to create a test case foe a class with getter and Constructor injection. When i user @MockBean for setter injection, @Mock for Constructor injection and also use @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) and MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); bean injection. If i comment MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); constructor injection not working. Now all beans are injected perfectly but @Mock beans(Contructor injected ) beans mocked mthods not working properly when its called.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Nov-07 at 05:08

When you run the test with spring runner, you must specify what exactly would you like to load as beans (read, let spring know what exactly should be included into the application context).

Usually this can be done with @ContextConfiguration annotation.

I suspect that since you don't specify this annotation, spring doesn't really loads any of your components (A, B, C in the question, etc).

Now @MockBean basically allows "altering" the application context for test purposes. It does so by providing a mock instead of a real bean that should have been loaded in "regular" application context.

In this case, there is no point to call MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); Spring will inject the mocks by itself once everything is configured properly.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58742175

QUESTION

Static pointer to this defined inside class for mock for googletest

Asked 2019-Oct-22 at 21:50

I'm trying to understand why a piece of code from production was designed in the following way: To give people some context, there is a class A containing a method, call it some_method, that needs to be mocked. The mock and all the tests need to be isolated from the production code. So what my colleagues did was redefine this class inside the test folder in the following way:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Oct-22 at 21:50

1. pointer_mockA is pointing to the last created instance or to nothing / nullptr. It points to nothing after app start and after every destruction af a mockA object.

2. The reason could be, because mockA is a nested class of A. Unfortenately c++ does not allow isolated definitions of those nested classes. It is only possible to forward declare a nested class in the outer class and define it later.

3. Is it common? I would say no. There are some strange things: why is pointer_mockA a public field. Why is there this static pointer? What is the definition of the Macro MOCK_METHOD1? Is it important to be a polymorphic class (virtual destructor)?

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58512398

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install mocka

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: