alter | convert text to images | Data Manipulation library

The optional identifier ? is for the last thing, either a characters or group. So the expression ([a-z0-9]{1,3})_? makes the underscore optional, but not the preceding group. The solution is to move the underscore into the parenthesis.

Because you've made a list of byte arrays. Not a list of bytes.

In other words, your list contains 1 item: An empty byte array.

You can't easily turn a byte[] into a List. There are slightly less trivial ways to do it (just do the obvious thing: Write a for loop), but note that a List is about 10x more wasteful than a byte[]. Generally, you don't 'want' a List, unless you are really very sure you do. Just about every byte-stream related API takes a byte[], In/OutputStream, or ByteBuffer, and rarely if ever a List, for example.

EDIT: To be clear, if the component type is not a primitive, then lists are just as efficient as arrays are, in practice more efficient (because it is cleaner code, and that is the only feasible road to a non-trivially-sized project that performs well). It's just collections-of-primitives that are, and it's the worst, by far, when we're talking about byte[].

I would recommend using /action:Script (see here) to see which actions it will perform, most likely this will give you some clue as to which flags should be set/cleared.

-- Edit According to this old answer you can disable deploying the database properties when designing the .dacpac.
If you want to override this behaviour when publishing the .dacpac, you should probably use the ScriptDatabaseOptions property - see the whole list of switches here.

The statement map.getValue(num) += 1 is not allowed because the += operator is only defined in 2 cases:

1. a plusAssign() operator is defined on the left operand's type (not the case for Int)
2. a plus() operator is defined on the left operand's type AND the left operand is a variable. In this case += reassigns the variable on the left with oldValue.plus(the right operand).

The compiler tries to consider case #2 here because Int.plus(Int) is defined, but the left operand is not a variable so it fails with the error message you mentioned. You can't write this for the same reasons you can't write map.getValue(num) = 42.

The correct way of mutating a value in a map is either via the set operator (like you did earlier with the syntax sugar map[num] = 0), or via other mutating functions like merge.

In your case, merge is nice because it can remove the special case altogether (it's only available on the JVM target though):

Looks the question was solved by @Larnu's comment, just add it as an answer to close the question.

If you are using Azure SQL Database, then what the error is telling you is true. Azure SQL Databases are what are known as Partially Contained databases; things like their USER objects have their own Password and the LOGIN objects on the server aren't used for connections. The CONNECTION permission is a server level permission, and thus not supported in Azure SQL Databases.

Ok, the signature container is embedded correctly.

But there are issues with the signature container itself:

• Both in the SignedData.digestAlgorithms collection and in the SignerInfo.digestAlgorithm value you have used the OID of SHA1withRSA, but that is a full signature algorithm, not the mere digest algorithm SHA1 expected there.

• Then the SHA1 hash of the signed bytes is BB78A402F7A537A34D6892B83881266501A691A8 but the hash you signed is 90E28B8A0D8E48691DAFE2BA10A4761FFFDCCD3D. This might be because you hash buffer2 and

  buffer2 has empty contents data (/Contents <>)

  The hex string delimiters '<' and '>' also belong to the contents value and, therefore, must also be removed in buffer2.

Furthermore, your signature is very weak:

• It uses SHA1 as hash algorithm. SHA1 meanwhile has been recognized as too weak a hash algorithm for document signatures.
• It doesn't use signed attributes, neither the ESS signing certificate nor the algorithm identifier protection attribute. Many validation policies require such special attributes.

You cannot use git bundle because:

As no direct connection between the repositories exists, the user must specify a basis for the bundle that is held by the destination repository: the bundle assumes that all objects in the basis are already in the destination repository.

_{From git bundle documentation}

In your case the new repository does not share anything with the old one, except for the working directory, which is not enough. In summary the last commit of the old repo should have the same hash of the first commit in the new repo.

You have another way, git format-patch and git am:

1. First you need to create a patch for each commit (except the first one) in the new repository:

Following Serializer will give the desired output: