protocol | repo contains the Spacemesh protocol specifications | Blockchain library
kandi X-RAY | protocol Summary
kandi X-RAY | protocol Summary
This document and the documents it links to collectively present an overview of the Spacemesh protocol in its entirety, and its constituent components. See What is Spacemesh?, below, for more information on the project. See Learn More, below, for links to many other resources on Spacemesh, both technical and non-technical.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of protocol
protocol Key Features
protocol Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on protocol
QUESTION
We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,
Error 400: invalid_request
You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.
You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.
Request details:
The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.
If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.
redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:
- The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
- I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
- Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
- This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the
urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser). - I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.
Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url
line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.
- GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
- GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
- RefreshAccessToken
QUESTION
I am using a company-hosted (Bitbucket) git repository that is accessible via HTTPS. Accessing it (e.g. git fetch
) worked using macOS 11 (Big Sur), but broke after an update to macOS 12 Monterey.
*
After the update of macOS to 12 Monterey my previous git setup broke. Now I am getting the following error message:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-02 at 07:12Unfortunately I can't provide you with a fix, but I've found a workaround for that exact same problem (company-hosted bitbucket resulting in exact same error).
I also don't know exactly why the problem occurs, but my best guess would be that the libressl library shipped with Monterey has some sort of problem with specific (?TLSv1.3) certs. This guess is because the brew-installed openssl v1.1 and v3 don't throw that error when executed with /opt/homebrew/opt/openssl/bin/openssl s_client -connect ...:443
To get around that error, I've built git from source built against different openssl and curl implementations:
- install
autoconf
,openssl
andcurl
with brew (I think you can select the openssl lib you like, i.e. v1.1 or v3, I chose v3) - clone git version you like, i.e.
git clone --branch v2.33.1 https://github.com/git/git.git
cd git
make configure
(that is why autoconf is needed)- execute
LDFLAGS="-L/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/lib -L/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/lib" CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/include -I/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/include" ./configure --prefix=$HOME/git
(here LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS include the libs git will be built against, the right flags are emitted by brew on install success of curl and openssl; --prefix is the install directory of git, defaults to/usr/local
but can be changed) make install
- ensure to add the install directory's subfolder
/bin
to the front of your$PATH
to "override" the default git shipped by Monterey - restart terminal
- check that
git version
shows the new version
This should help for now, but as I already said, this is only a workaround, hopefully Apple fixes their libressl fork ASAP.
QUESTION
I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".
January 11, 2022 Final brownout.
This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.
Second, check your package.json
dependencies for any git://
URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.
As noted by Jörg W Mittag:
For GitHub Actions:There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".
Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.
The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.
As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:
QUESTION
I am trying to run Oracle db in docker on M1 Mac. I have tried images from both store/oracle/database-enterprise:12.2.0.1-slim
and container-registry.oracle.com/database/enterprise:12.2.0.1-slim
but getting the same error.
docker run -d -it --name oracle -v $(pwd)/db/oradata:/ORCL store/oracle/database-enterprise:12.2.0.1-slim
I also tried non-slim version and by providing the --platform linux/amd64
to the docker command. Result is same.
Here's the result of docker logs -f oracle
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 20:48There are two issues here:
- Oracle Database is not supported on ARM processors, only Intel. See here: https://github.com/oracle/docker-images/issues/1814
- Oracle Database Docker images are only supported with Oracle Linux 7 or Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 as the host OS. See here: https://github.com/oracle/docker-images/tree/main/OracleDatabase/SingleInstance
Oracle Database ... is supported for Oracle Linux 7 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 7. For more details please see My Oracle Support note: Oracle Support for Database Running on Docker (Doc ID 2216342.1)
The referenced My Oracle Support Doc ID goes on to say that the database binaries in their Docker image are built specifically for Oracle Linux hosts, and will also work on Red Hat. That's it.
Because Docker provides process level virtualization it still pulls kernel and other OS libraries from the underlying host OS. A Docker image built for Oracle Linux needs an Oracle Linux host; it doesn't bring the Oracle Linux OS with it. Only Oracle Linux or Red Hat Linux are supported for any Oracle database Linux installation, with or without Docker. Ubuntu, Mac OS, Debian, or any other *NIX flavor will not provide predictable reliable results, even if it is hacked into working or the processes appear to work normally.
QUESTION
I recently updated my android studio to Arctic Fox and got an error in my project
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-17 at 10:30For insecure HTTP connections in Gradle 7+ versions, we need to specify a boolean allowInsecureProtocol as true to MavenArtifactRepository
closure.
Since you have received this error for sonatype
repository, you need to set the repositories as below:
- Groovy DSL
QUESTION
After upgrading to android 12, the application is not compiling. It shows
"Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs"
Error showing in Merged manifest:
Merging Errors: Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for
android:exported
when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file)
I have set all the activity with android:exported="false"
. But it is still showing this issue.
My manifest file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 09:18I'm not sure what you're using to code, but in order to set it in Android Studio, open the manifest of your project and under the "activity" section, put android:exported="true"(or false if that is what you prefer). I have attached an example.
QUESTION
Am starting off in blockchain development using the book Mastering Blockchain - A deep dive into distributed ledgers, consensus protocols, smart contracts, DApps, cryptocurrencies, Ethereum,
Am using WSL with geth version 1.10.9.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-11 at 23:20It appears 1.10.9-stable version has a problem and is returning a -rpc error. GETH 1.10.8-stable version works fine when running the geth command with --rpc
QUESTION
Question in short
I have migrated my project from Django 2.2 to Django 3.2, and now I want to start using the possibility for asynchronous views. I have created an async view, setup asgi configuration, and run gunicorn with a Uvicorn worker. When swarming this server with 10 users concurrently, they are served synchronously. What do I need to configure in order to serve 10 concurrent users an async view?
Question in detail
This is what I did so far in my local environment:
- I am working with Django 3.2.10 and Python 3.9.
- I have installed
gunicorn
anduvicorn
through pip - I have created an
asgi.py
file with the following contents
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 21:43When running the gunicorn
command, you can try to add workers
parameter with using options -w
or --workers
.
It defaults to 1
as stated in the gunicorn documentation. You may want to try to increase that value.
Example usage:
QUESTION
I am using FastAPI with Pydantic.
My problem - I need to raise ValueError using Pydantic
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-25 at 04:48If you're not raising an HTTPException
then normally any other uncaught exception will generate a 500 response (an Internal Server Error
). If your intent is to respond with some other custom error message and HTTP status when raising a particular exception - say, ValueError
- then you can use add a global exception handler to your app:
QUESTION
I have a Python 3 application running on CentOS Linux 7.7 executing SSH commands against remote hosts. It works properly but today I encountered an odd error executing a command against a "new" remote server (server based on RHEL 6.10):
encountered RSA key, expected OPENSSH key
Executing the same command from the system shell (using the same private key of course) works perfectly fine.
On the remote server I discovered in /var/log/secure
that when SSH connection and commands are issued from the source server with Python (using Paramiko) sshd complains about unsupported public key algorithm:
userauth_pubkey: unsupported public key algorithm: rsa-sha2-512
Note that target servers with higher RHEL/CentOS like 7.x don't encounter the issue.
It seems like Paramiko picks/offers the wrong algorithm when negotiating with the remote server when on the contrary SSH shell performs the negotiation properly in the context of this "old" target server. How to get the Python program to work as expected?
Python code
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 14:49Imo, it's a bug in Paramiko. It does not handle correctly absence of server-sig-algs
extension on the server side.
Try disabling rsa-sha2-*
on Paramiko side altogether:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install protocol
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page