thunk | Useful thunk combinators for golang code generation | Generator Utils library

I have been stock on this error on my project when I add "proxy": "http://localhost:6000" in my package.json.

This is the error response after yarn start.

Invalid options object. Dev Server has been initialized using an options object that does not match the API schema.

• options.allowedHosts[0] should be a non-empty string. error Command failed with exit code 1. info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.

But everything is fine when I remove the "proxy": "http://localhost:6000".

This is on my package.json:

It was working fine before I have done nothing, no packages update, no gradle update no nothing just created new build and this error occurs. but for some team members the error occur after gradle sync.

The issue is that build is generating successfully without any error but when opens the app it suddenly gets crash (in both debug and release mode)

Error

hi i m using react with redux. 1 hour before its working perfectly but now getting error TypeScript error in /Users/invest19/Desktop/super admin/super Admin guest /invest19-admin-web/node_modules/redux-thunk/es/index.d.ts(1,13): '=' expected. TS1005

Please help me for resolve this issue

Screenshot

Trying to install dependencies below

Because of Google Play, I had to update an old project of mine to the latest expo versions (version 43.0.0 to be exact). The idea is for the app to scan a QRCode and process the data, simply. However, expo-barcode-scanner only works once and after that I need to close and open the app again to work. Has anyone encountered this problem and (or) knows how to solve it? Below is my code:

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

We have a large, and growing, app that is based around Redux Toolkit. Where possible we try to separate parts of the application into their own node packages. We find there are a lot of benefits to doing this, including:

• Maintainability of codebase
• Fine-grained control over intra-application dependencies
• Testability

It's easy enough to do this for cross-cutting things, like logging, http requests, routing, etc. But we would like to go further and modularize the "features" of our app. For example, have the "address book" feature of our application live in a different module than, say, the "messages" feature, with them all composed together via an "app" package.

The benefits we see here are ones we have found in other codebases and have been discussed in other places. (E.g., here for iOS). But, in brief: (1) you can see and control intra-app dependencies. For example, you can easily see if the "messages" feature depends on the "address book" feature and make explicit decisions about how you will expose the one feature to the other via what you export; (2) you can build fully testable sub-parts of the app by simply having a "preview" package that only composes in the things you want to test, e.g., you could have a "contact app" package that only depends on the "contact" feature for building and testing just that; (3) you can speed up CI/CD times by not needing to compile (TS/babel), pack/minify, and unit test every part; (4) you can utilize various analytics tools to get more fine-grained pictures of how each feature is developing.

There may well be other ways to achieve these things, and some may disagree with the premise that this is a good way to do it. That's not the focus of the question, but I'm open to the possibility it may be the best answer (e.g., some one with significant Redux experience may explain why this is a bad idea).

We've struggled to come up with a good way to do this with Redux Toolkit. The problem seems to boil down to -- is there a good way to modularize (via separate node packages) the various "slices" used in RTK? (This may apply to other Redux implementations but we are heavily invested in RTK).

It's easy enough to have a package that exports the various items that will be used by the redux store, i.e., the slice state, action creators, async thunks, and selectors. And RTK will then compose those very nicely in the higher-level app. In other words, you can easily have an "app" package that holds the store, and then a "contacts" package that exports the "contacts" slice, with its attendant actions, thunks, selectors, etc.

The problem comes if you also want the components and hooks that use that portion of slice to live in the same package as the slice, e.g., in the "contacts" package. Those components/hooks will need access to the global dispatch and the global useSelector hook to really work, but that only exists in the "app" component, i.e., the feature that composes together the various feature packages.

1. We could export the global dispatch and useSelector from the "higher" level "app" package, but then our sub-components now depend on the higher level packages. That means we can no longer build alternate higher level packages that compose different arrangements of sub packages.

2. We could use separate stores. This has been discussed in the past regarding Redux and has been discouraged, although there is some suggestion it might be OK if you are trying to achieve modularization. These discussions are also somewhat old.

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

While I'm primarily interested if if/how this can be done in RTK, I'd also be interested in answers--especially from folks with experience with RTK/redux on large apps--as to whether this is Bad Idea and what other approaches are taken to achieve the benefits of modularization.

I have a project and with this project I have a login page and I want to use "RouteComponentProps", but I got this error:

I'm getting this error after I've updated the packages in my package JSON file.

I have a CrudActions.js class: