l9fuzz | Help fuzz various protocols and waits for ping backs | Security Testing library

by LeakIX Go Version: v1.1.0 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(3)Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | l9fuzz Summary

l9fuzz is a Go library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. l9fuzz has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Fuzzes various protocols with JNDI LDAP payloads and listen for ping backs.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

l9fuzz has a low active ecosystem.

It has 8 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are no watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

l9fuzz has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of l9fuzz is v1.1.0

Quality

l9fuzz has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

l9fuzz has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

l9fuzz code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

l9fuzz does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

l9fuzz releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed l9fuzz and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into l9fuzz implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Run executes the scanner .
NewFuzzer creates a new fuzzer
HttpClient returns a new http client
WithRequestTemplate configures the request template .
WithPayloadTemplate configures the payload template for the given file
Main entry point .
WithOutputChannel configures the fuzzer for the fuzzer .
WithLDAPLogOutput sets the logging output for ldapserver .
WithTimeout overrides the default timeout
WithListenAddress is a functional option for Fuzzer .

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

l9fuzz Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for l9fuzz.

l9fuzz Examples and Code Snippets

l9fuzz,Usage

Lines of Code : 18

License : No License

Copy

Usage: l9fuzz scan --listen-address=STRING --input-file=INPUT-FILE

Scans url for JNDI

Flags:
  -h, --help                       Show context-sensitive help.

      --timeout=2s
      --wait=1m
  -l, --listen-address=STRING      Listen address (ip:p

l9fuzz,Output

Lines of Code : 10

License : No License

Copy

$ ./l9fuzz scan -i - -m 400 -l 167.71.13.196:45432 
Started server at 167.71.13.196:45432
[ldap-reply] From: 14.201.105.110:51428 | Source: https://24.201.106.150:443 | Vector: http-header-x-forwarded-for | Delay: 1.849171982s
[ldap-reply] From: 14.2

l9fuzz,Input file format

Lines of Code : 7

License : No License

Copy

http://12.44.55.66:8000/test
ssh://34.54.33.22:22
ssh://32.54.33.32:22
ssh://34.54.33.25:2222
tls://43.33.44.11:8081
tcp://12.12.12.12:23
55.21.45.11:8080

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Security Testing

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

QUESTION

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install l9fuzz

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: