validity | Golang package for beautiful data validation | Validation library
kandi X-RAY | validity Summary
kandi X-RAY | validity Summary
Package to parse and validate unsafe input. Includes a nice range of build-in validators, and is extensible for custom validation rules. This was inspired by Laravel's validators, and was written partially as an experiment while learning Go.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- GetCheckerErrors returns a list of errors for a given set of rules .
- ValidateStructTags validates struct tags
- callIn executes a method in m .
- firstToUpper converts first letter to upper case .
- inSlice checks if a is in a list
- snake to CamelCase
- inferValidationType gets validation type
- Run runs the validation queue .
- ValidateMap validates a map
- ValidateStruct validates structs
validity Key Features
validity Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on validity
QUESTION
I'm currently facing an issue where my Flutter application is unable to fetch consumable in-app products from Google Play store. However, my application is able to fetch all products from the Apple app store.
I can't identify what step I'm missing or what is causing all of my product ids to be not found. I'm using flutter's in_app_purchase module to facilitate in app purchases.
For Android, here are the setup steps I've taken.
- I've setup my Google Play Console and Developer Account
- Completed all the tasks in the Set up your app section
- Generated a keystore file to sign my app
keytool -genkey -v -keystore c:\Users\USER_NAME\key.jks -storetype JKS -keyalg RSA -keysize 2048 -validity 10000 -alias key
- Created a file named /android/key.properties that contains a reference to my keystore file. The contents of this file look like the following:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 21:46The issue has finally been solved. You need to call InAppPurchase method, isAvailable(), before queryProductDetails() when on the Android platform. I'm not sure why you don't need to do the same when on the IOS platform.
The documentation didn't specify the need for this outright, but let it stand that querying for products AFTER checking if the store is available fixed my issue on Android.
QUESTION
Sorry if my title is difficult to understand.
I've multiple fields named date1, date2... On Change of those fields, I want a full script to run. Today, I have simply copied the code for each dateN I have.
I would like to have a cleaner code and use the next JQuery selector:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-27 at 11:42Use it like this:
QUESTION
I'm deploying a spring-boot application and prometheus container through docker, and have exposed the spring-boot /actuator/prometheus
endpoint successfully. However, when I enable prometheus debug logs, I can see it fails to scrape the metrics:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-07 at 22:37Ok, I think I found my problem. I made two changes:
First, I moved the contents of the web.config.file into the prometheus.yml file under the 'spring-actuator'. Then I changed the target to use the hostname for my backend container, rather than 127.0.0.1.
The end result was a single prometheus.yml file:
QUESTION
I'm trying to validate huge amount of data using Laravel LazyCollection, I test the code with 15 thousands rows each contains 9 columns to be validated.
The scenario is user upload the excel file, then convert it to array, after that the validation of data begins
The Controller :
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-27 at 17:25Since you have already loaded the entire contents of the spreadsheet into the $validatedFile
variable, why make a LazyCollection
object? Their only purpose is to save memory by not loading large data sets into memory. Your validation rules using closures can also be cleaned up. This isn't just a cosmetic change: in_array()
is notoriously slow.
QUESTION
I have a dataframe that I'd like to save using Arrow.write()
.
I can save a subframe of it by omitting one column. But if I leave the column in, I get this error:
ArgumentError: type does not have a definite number of fields
The objects in this column are all 4-Tuples, and their elements are all either empty Tuples or 1- or 2-Tuples of Int64s. Typical examples would be ((1), (), (2), ())
and ((1, 2), (), (), ())
. If I use Arrays of Arrays rather than Tuples of Tuples, it works just fine. I prefer to use tuples, and I would prefer not to have to process data before writing and after reading it (note that this also rules out things like using four separate columns -- plus I suspect having 2-tuples and 1-tuples and empty tuples in the same column would produce the same error).
I don't really understand the meaning of the error here, so I'm not sure how to fix it. Is there an easy fix? Or do I need to use arrays instead?
Here is a minimal working example which gives me this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-22 at 06:43Probably you need to update your packages, because your problem is not reproducible under the current versions of these packages.
PS It is very difficult to find any good reason on earth to save such a structure in a data frame. Transform your data in such a way that each column has an optimal structure for data manipulation (like, Int, Float64,...)
QUESTION
I've been working in Linux for the last 12 years, worked with Windows and command lines before that and have had to recently resurrect those batch file skills for a little easy to use / edit utility. However, I'm having some issues in finding out how to build up a string variable with newline characters (the equivalent of Linux's echo -e "Line1\nLine2"
)
Basically my utility asks three questions of a user and checks the validity of the inputs. Each input has a slightly different "error message" if the validity fails. I then have a check to see if the errMsg
variable contains anything and if it does, it lists the collated error messages from the 3 validity checks. This all works perfectly with the exception of the error message is on one line and I'd like to put each error on it's own line. I then "merely" add newlines to the string ... and that's the crux of this question.
I've used this link as a reference point and with a basic string, the new lines appear as expected. However, when I use a variable, the new lines don't appear and I was hoping someone could explain to me why.
I have the following code snippet
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 22:37To create a new line variable is a good start. But you should use it in a different way.
Percent expansion doesn't work quite well with newlines in variables, it can be done, but it's quite complex.
But delayed expansion flawlessly works with any characters
QUESTION
I'm using nextjs and nextauth on nginx. I'm getting a build fail but I'm not sure how to fix this error.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-10 at 20:28It seems next-auth/client
was renamed to next-auth/react
in v4
:
https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.1
QUESTION
EDIT:
log from org.springframework.security:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 22:08This isn't an answer, however too long for a comment..
It looks like the session is getting lost for some reason, definitely focus on that.
In a default Spring Boot config the session is managed by the underlying servlet container, so its worth checking that is functioning properly. Things to check:
- Are you running more than 1 app server node? If so, ensure the session is using some sort of cluster aware config (ie Redis / JDBC), local session will fail here for sure
- It's worth checking the defaults with OAuth2 login in Spring Boot. eg you could try and specify the OAuth2 session using the
HttpSessionOAuth2AuthorizedClientRepository
and aSpringSessionBackedSessionRegistry
Basically enable all the logs and try and observe the session states from the servlet container when the problem occurs.
Getting the oauth2 session working correctly can be non-trivial, especially given there are not many good blog / docs that describe what spring boot is doing.
That said, here's an example of a working Redis backed Spring Boot config with OAuth 2 login, which might be useful as a reference for you:
app config:
QUESTION
I've implemented a custom validation message on my input for the pattern
validation rule while leaving the default message for required
as is. However, when I do so, once the input becomes invalid, it never becomes valid again, even though I am meeting the pattern
criteria.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-03 at 16:18First of all, per MDN:
It's vital to set the message to an empty string if there are no errors. As long as the error message is not empty, the form will not pass validation and will not be submitted.
This agrees with that the HTML standard says:
Suffering from a custom error
When a control's custom validity error message (as set by the element's
setCustomValidity()
method orElementInternals
'ssetValidity()
method) is not the empty string.An element satisfies its constraints if it is not suffering from any of the above validity states.
Your sample does not clear the custom error if the form field is determined to be valid. As such, once the field is determined invalid, it stays so for the remainder of the session.
Moreover, you modify custom error only after the field has already been determined invalid. This means the form will still not be submitted even if you clear the message in the same handler.
A better way too accomplish your goal would be to monitor the field in the change
event handler for the field and set the custom message there:
QUESTION
I use a HttpClient
to communicate with my server as shown below:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-23 at 15:06This is a long-standing issue #6351 in Xamarin.Android, caused by LetsEncrypt's root expiring and them moving to a new root.
Below is a copy of my post in that issue explaining the situation and the workarounds. See other posts in that thread for details on the workarounds.
Scott Helme has a fantastic write-up of the situation. Go and read that first, then I'll describe how (I think) this applies to xamarin-android.
I'm going to copy the key diagram from that article (source):
The red chain is what used to happen: the IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 is an old root certificate which is trusted pretty much everywhere, including on Android devices from 2.3.6 onwards. This is what LetsEncrypt used to use as their root, and it meant that everyone trusted them. However, this IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 recently expired, which means that a bunch of devices won't trust anything signed by it. LetsEncrypt needed to move to their own root certificate.
The blue chain is the ideal new one -- the ISRG Root X1 is LetsEncrypt's own root certificate, which is included on Android 7.1.1+. Android devices >= 7.1.1 will trust certificates which have been signed by this ISRG Root X1.
However, the problem is that old pre-7.1.1 Android devices don't know about ISRG Root X1, and don't trust this.
The workaround which LetsEncrypt is using is that old Android devices don't check whether the root certificate has expired. They therefore by default serve a chain which includes LetsEncrypt's root ISRG Root X1 certificate (which up-to-date devices trust), but also include a signature from that now-expired IdenTrust DST Root CA X3. This means that old Android devices trust the chain (as they trust the IdenTrust DST Root CA X3, and don't check whether it's expired), and newer devices also trust the chain (as they're able to work out that even though the root of the chain has expired, they still trust that middle ISRG Root X1 certificate as a valid root in its own right, and therefore trust it).
This is the green path, the one which LetsEncrypt currently serves by default.
However, the BoringSSL library used by xamarin-android isn't Android's SSL library. It 1) Doesn't trust the IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 because it's expired, and 2) Isn't smart enough to figure out that it does trust the ISRG Root X1 which is also in the chain. So if you serve the green chain in the image above, it doesn't trust it. Gack.
The options therefore are:
- Don't use BoringSSL and do use Android's SSL library. This means that xamarin-android behaves the same as other Android apps, and trusts the expired root. This is done by using
AndroidClientHandler
as described previously. This should fix Android >= 2.3.6. - Do use BoringSSL but remove the expired IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 from Android's trust store ("Digital Signature Trust Co. - DST Root CA X3" in the settings). This tricks BoringSSL into stopping its chain at the ISRG Root X1, which it trusts (on Android 7.1.1+). However this will only work on Android devices which trust the ISRG Root X1, which is 7.1.1+.
- Do use BoringSSL, and change your server to serve a chain which roots in the ISRG Root X1, rather than the expired IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 (the blue chain in the image above), using
--preferred-chain "ISRG Root X1"
. This means that BoringSSL ignores the IdenTrust DST Root CA X3 entirely, and roots to the ISRG Root X1. This again will only work on Android devices which trust the ISRG Root X1, i.e. 7.1.1+. - Do the same as 3, but by manually editing fullchain.pem.
- Use another CA such as ZeroSSL, which uses a root which is trusted back to Android 2.2, and which won't expire until 2038.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install validity
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page