fit | manipulating datasets | Machine Learning library

Or, more specifically, does it use the default shell, or actually running the actual file. Example: system("echo Hello, World!"). Would this run using, lets say Bash, or would this run by telling to kernal to run a command? Also, is this on topic, or would this fit better somewhere else?

I am trying to get the best combination to reach the best R Squared and P value. In this case, I have 6 columns to run the code, but I have the R-Squared and P values just for this combo ([col0, col1, col2, col3, col4, col5] vs [col6]). I want to test all the possible combinations, something like:

[col0] vs [col6]

[col0 + col1] vs [col6]

[col0 + col1 + col2] vs [col6]...

Is there any way to automatize this? So I dont have to run all possible combinations on hand.

the swiftui code below should apply the sephia.tone filter to the current photo, to do it I used the code below but the filter is not applied, can anyone explain to me where the problem is? when I click on sepia I make the call to the function that applies the CiFilter,what is this due to? because the filter is not applied correctly

Swift UI Code:

I am pretty new to python and I am trying to sort through a directory's files that start with 'O0' and copy any string in the text files that has an 'F', 'T', or 'S' in them, and paste, preferably just that string, (but the whole line would still work) in a new text file, preferably on the desktop. It is making the text file, but it is blank, and python does not close the file. Here's what I have so far:

A part of my form contains QGroupBox (Status Box) with 4 child QGroupBoxes arranged in a grid layout (2x2). Two bottom QGroupBoxes (Widget 1 Box and Widget 2 Box) contain widgets of fixed size (with set minimumSize and maximumSize) so they're non-resizable at all in both directions. Because of that rigid size constraints top row of QGroupBoxes (Summary Box and Helper Box) can only be resized in vertical direction.

And here comes the troublesome part. Top-left QGroupBox (Summary Box) have grid layout 5x3 while top-right (Helper Box) have vertical layout with 6 rows. If I have naive widget placement as shown on picture 1 Qt is enlarging vertical size of both labels in top row to make height of both QGroupBoxes equal (see red arrows on picture 1).

This is definitely that I don't want so I've added vertical spacer to the bottom of Summary Box and from the first glance it worked (picture 2). But only from the first glance... What you see is the minimum height of my whole form and the bottom side of spacer and last QCheckBox in the Helper Box seems to be aligned.

If I'm expanding my form vertically this spacer grows a bit and that causes the increase of height of both top QGroupBoxes. As a result spacing between QCheckBoxes increases too and we can also see that top and bottom spacing are unequal for the top-right box (see red arrows on picture 3).

I've tried to play with sizeType for my vertical spacer. If I set it to Minimum or MinimumExpanding then the spacer doesn't grow on resize (and doesn't shrink, too) but it appears to be expanded to the size as on picture 3 (corrupting spacings between QCheckBoxes too). If I set it to Maximum, Preferred or Expanding then I observe the same behavior as described above for picture 3.

What is the proper way to achieve alignment for two QGroupBoxes in a row of grid without affecting spacing between elements (e. g. in that case make vertical spacer to fit only single row of grid layout and never expand/shrink)?

I am trying a regression problem with the following dataset (sinusoidal curve) of size 500

First, I tried with 2 dense layer with 10 units each

I have a generator object, that loads quite big amount of data and hogs the I/O of the system. The data is too big to fit into memory all at once, hence the use of generator. And I have a consumer that all of the CPU to process the data yielded by generator. It does not consume much of other resources. Is it possible to interleave these tasks using threads?

For example I'd guess it is possible to run the simplified code below in 11 seconds.

I am trying to use my own train step in with Keras by creating a class that inherits from Model. It seems that the training works correctly but the evaluate function always returns 0 on the loss even if I send to it the train data, which have a big loss value during the training. I can't share my code but was able to reproduce using the example form the Keras api in https://keras.io/guides/customizing_what_happens_in_fit/ I changed the Dense layer to have 2 units instead of one, and made its activation to sigmoid.

The code:

The highest Y position that is shown in my camera is 5 and -5. For the X its 10. I'm making a tower defense game and I want the tower to follow my mouseposition after I buy it until I click on a place in the track to build/ place it. I got so confused because I couldn't see my tower at all but now I realized that my mouse coordinates are HUGE. It's up to the hundreds on each axis. My screen obviously can't fit that. I tried even dividing the mouseposition in a vector 2 by 45 and making an offset so it can fit well. Unfortunately I have to change the values depending on the screen size so that can't work. I don't know if it matters but here's my script? This script get's called after the tower gets instantiated from the store. The store button is in the canvas if that helps? Maybe the canvas is why everything is off? How do I fix it?