pet | Simple command-line snippet manager, written in Go | Text Editor library
kandi X-RAY | pet Summary
kandi X-RAY | pet Summary
Simple command-line snippet manager, written in Go. You can use variables ( or ) in snippets.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pet
pet Key Features
pet Examples and Code Snippets
public void updatePetWithForm(Long petId, String name, String status) throws RestClientException {
Object postBody = null;
// verify the required parameter 'petId' is set
if (petId == null) {
throw new Htt
public ResponseEntity updatePetWithFormWithHttpInfo(Long petId, String name, String status) throws RestClientException {
Object postBody = null;
// verify the required parameter 'petId' is set
if (petId == null) {
public ResponseEntity deletePetWithHttpInfo(Long petId, String apiKey) throws RestClientException {
Object postBody = null;
// verify the required parameter 'petId' is set
if (petId == null) {
throw new HttpClient
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pet
QUESTION
I've the following table
Owner Pet Housing_Type A Cats;Dog;Rabbit 3 B Dog;Rabbit 2 C Cats 2 D Cats;Rabbit 3 E Cats;Fish 1The code is as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 08:48One approach is to define a helper function that matches for a specific animal, then bind the columns to the original frame.
Note that some wrangling is done to get rid of whitespace to identify the unique animals to query.
QUESTION
I am currently looking for an elegant way to decide between request and response objects. Let's say I create an animal and my API generates the ID for the animal. I don't want someone to provide the ID in the body of the request. I also don't want the ID to be displayed as a request example, e.g. in a Swagger UI.
If I return the created animal afterwards, then the ID should be given and also Swagger UI should show the ID for Responses as an example.
My only idea for this is to create two classes for the animal:
- PetRequest & Pet (Response) and to cast the PetRequest to Pet.
Is there a better way to do this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-19 at 17:12My only idea for this is to create two classes for the animal:
PetRequest
andPetResponse
No, that's exactly how you're meant to do it (well, except for "cast the PetRequest
to a Pet
, don't do that, use AutoMapper or similar instead).
I argue that it's a shortsighted (or just lazy) mistake to simply reuse a single DTO contract for all use-cases:
A common mantra in object/class/type-design is "make invalid states unrepresentable" (it is not without its detractors though) - which means that if a Pet
object cannot have a meaningful PetId
property (e.g. because it hasn't been INSERTed
yet to get an IDENTITY/AUTONUMBER
value back) then it shouldn't have a PetId
property at all - which in-turn means you will need separate DTO types: NewPet
and ExistingPet
(or EditPet
or similar).
You can (ab)use inheritance from a base PetValues
DTO class to avoid repeating yourself or manually maintaining copy+pasta'd sets of object properties, but I feel it's a bad idea to use inheritance as a substitute for mixins (which C# still doesn't support, argh) because you'll end-up inadvertently including inappropriate members, and because if you want to use immutable types as DTOs then you'll run into lots of pain with immutable types' constructors as C# (still) doesn't have automatic constructor parameter inheritance (i.e. you can't add a new member to a base immutable DTO type without having also update all subclasses' constructors to add those new parameters for the new members).
Unfortunately Swagger doesn't play-nice with DTO type inheritance, either due to limitations in the tooling or other reasons, but in practice I find this isn't an issue because tooling that generates C#/.NET DTO types from Swagger JSON will let you customize the generated output. Polymorphism should not be a feature of DTOs/data-contracts anyway: they're meant to be record-style representations of structured data, not mutable object graphs.
Anyway, I'd do it like this (caution: this is my personal style, also assuming C# 8.0+ non-nullable reference-types are enabled, and all DTO members are non-nullable):
QUESTION
I'm creating a pet project with Hilt, and perhaps I'm having this issue because I'm installing everything in SingletonComponent::class
, and perhaps I should create components for each one.
The pet project has a NetworkModule
, UserPrefsModule
, and the problem appeared when I was trying to create an Authenticator
for OkHttp3
.
This is my network module
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 18:41In most programming languages, if you require an instance of B to construct A and an instance of A to construct B, then you won't be able to construct either.
Here:
- AccessTokenRefreshDataSource requires AuthenticationService
- AuthenticationService requires Retrofit
- Retrofit requires OkHttpClient
- OkHttpClient requires Authenticator
- Authenticator requires AccessTokenRefreshDataSource
...and consequently, regardless of your module or component structure, Dagger can't create any of those instances first.
However, if your AccessTokenRefreshDataSourceImpl does not need its AuthenticationService instance within the constructor itself, you can replace it with Provider
: Dagger automatically lets you inject Provider
for any T in the graph, among other useful bindings. This allows Dagger to create your AccessTokenRefreshDataSource without first creating an AuthenticationService, with the promise that once the object graph is created your AccessTokenRefreshDataSource can receive the singleton AuthenticationService instance it needs. After you inject the provider, just call authenticationServiceProvider.get()
to get the instance wherever you need it (presumably outside the constructor).
Of course, you can solve your problem with the same refactor anywhere else in your graph you control. AccessTokenAuthenticator is also a reasonable refactor point, assuming you've written it yourself and thus can modify its constructor.
Points discussed in the comments:
- You can always inject a
Provider
instead of any bindingT
in your graph. In addition to being valuable for breaking dependency cycles, it can also be handy if your dependency-injected class needs to instantiate an arbitrary number of that object, or if creating the object takes a lot of memory or classloading and you want to delay it until later. Of course, if the object is cheap to construct without dependency cycles and you expect to callget()
exactly once, then you can skip that and directly injectT
as you've done here.Provider
is a single-method object. Callingget()
on it is the same as calling a getter of typeT
on the Component itself. If the object is unscoped, you get a new one; if the object is scoped, you get the one that Dagger has stored in the Component.Generally speaking you can just inject the Provider and call
get
on it directly:
QUESTION
Suppose I have a class Animal
which are inherited by Dog
and Cat
.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-10 at 05:43Here is how you do it
QUESTION
I want to pull all the values from a particular column in another table. My goal is to take a handful of different tables and put particular columns from each of them into a single, collated table.
For example, let's say I have tables about different kinds of objects
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-07 at 14:28I added two tables to a sheet: tblFruits and tblPets.
Then you can put the following formula in any cell on the same sheet or another sheet.
QUESTION
This is a followup question from this earlier thread
I have output that comes from a sequence() function. I want to run a calculation that sums up the output from the sequence() function. In particular, I want it to be structured so that my calculation will be right, even if the underlying data gets additional rows. I'll describe this in more detail with example data.
Say my output from the sequence() function looks like this
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-15 at 00:52For versions of Excel that suppot LET
QUESTION
Currently I use global precipitation (ppt) and potential evapotranspiration (pet) data to calculate SPEI. As I have limited hardware resources, I divided global ppt and ppt data into 32 parts, each file covering 45x45deg and contains 756 data - monthly from 1958-2020 (tile01.nc, tile02.nc, ... tile32.nc)
- For example to do this, I use
cdo sellonlatbox,-180,-135,45,90 in.nc out.nc
orncks -d lat,45.,90. -d lon,-180.,-135. in.nc -O out.nc
- As required by SPEI script, I reorder and fixed the dimension from
time,lat,lon
tolat,lon,time
usingncpdq
andncks
. - From the SPEI output, I got the output in
lat,lon,time
. So I did reorder the dimension so that it becomestime,lat,lon
usingncpdq
. - Each tile SPEI output covering 45x45deg and contains 756 SPEI data - monthly from 1958-2020
Finally I need to merge all the output together (32 files) into one, so I will get the global SPEI output. I have try to use cdo mergegrid
but the result is not what I expected. Is there any command from cdo
or nco
to solve this problem that has function similar to gdal_merge
if we are dealing with geoTIFF format?
Below is the example of the SPEI output
UPDATE
I managed to merge all the data using cdo collgrid
as suggested by Robert below. And here's the result:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 13:55I believe you want to use CDO's distgrid and collgrid methods for this.
First, run this:
QUESTION
I need to add every value from key name and from key age to the list
But after start of this code there is:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-30 at 11:12You need to get the nested order. As you see, the key 'name' is under 'dogs', then the key 'name' does not exist under . Thus, you need to call it as
QUESTION
I have seen in many places that to access nested documents and collections the pattern is something like db.collection("users").doc("frank").collection("pets")
etc.
This makes a lot of sense to me and is easy to understand. The trouble is, my (React) project is set up in the Web version 9 way. I've combed the docs over and over and can't see anything that goes beyond referencing X doc in Y collection.
I need to reference Users > uid > someCollection
But in the Web Version 9 way I can only do: doc(db, "users", uid)
How do I go deeper?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-31 at 09:25If you are trying to get:
- a CollectionReference, then use
collection()
:
QUESTION
I have the following models
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-27 at 02:41The read_only_fields
meta option will work for the fields which are not explicitly defined in the Serializer.
So, in your case, you need to add the read_only=True
to those explicitly defined fields, as
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pet
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page