multi-tenancy | working place for multi-tenancy related proposals | Frontend Framework library

There is a warning on the Firebase best practices documentation against using Firebase with multi-tenant applications: https://firebase.google.com/docs/projects/learn-more#multi-tenancy

This is what I am most concerned about: "Multi-tenancy can lead to serious configuration and data privacy concerns problems, including unintended issues with analytics aggregation, shared authentication, overly-complex database structures, and difficulties with security rules."

There is also plenty of official Google documentation supporting the use of Firebase for multi-tenancy, for instance: https://cloud.google.com/identity-platform/docs/multi-tenancy-authentication .

Do you know why they would have these conflicting recommendations and examples? Does use of Google Identity Platform fix the core security deficits mentioned in the warning?

I am re-posting this question, with additional clarification in the title, and a few edits/removals from the body, to specify that I am only looking for why this widely used product has this particular warning in its official documentation. I have removed most subjective content. I have no opinion on this that is relevant to the question - I am only looking to understand the warning. It seemed there was one good answer before the previous question was closed, so I will link that here for reference: Why is Google Firebase not recommended by Google in their own documentation for multi-tenant applications?

There is a warning on the Firebase best practices documentation against using Firebase with multi-tenant applications: https://firebase.google.com/docs/projects/learn-more#multi-tenancy

This is what I am most concerned about: "Multi-tenancy can lead to serious configuration and data privacy concerns problems, including unintended issues with analytics aggregation, shared authentication, overly-complex database structures, and difficulties with security rules." Identity Platform looks like it should cover everything except analytics aggregation and database structures, but I can control analytics logging and my database structure is simple enough, being divided cleanly by tenant. My application is one common application, but has tenanted client data and users (managed via Google Identity Platform).

There is also plenty of official Google documentation supporting the use of Firebase for multi-tenancy: https://cloud.google.com/identity-platform/docs/multi-tenancy-authentication . There are also dozens of examples out there for how to set up multi-tenancy with Firebase and Google Identity Provider.

Do you know why they would have these conflicting recommendations and examples? Does use of Google Identity Platform fix the core security deficits mentioned in the warning? It has me strongly considering abandoning Firebase, which would be a shame given the features it gives me.

We are working with a schema-based multi-tenancy database. We are on an Elixir stack, using Postgres, Ecto, and Triplex within a Phoenix Framework project.

We are using the default schema public to store common data, such as users and organisations. In particular, we have within the Organisations table a tenant_prefix column which we use to map a user to their tenancy.

Within a tenancy, we tenant-specific tables. As an example, we have a Products table. When a new organisation is created, we use Triplex to create the schema and run tenant migrations, which create the tenant-specific tables such as Products.

As a visual, the database looks like this:

I am following a tutorial on multi-tenancy in Django (10:58/11:42) and I would like to modify the hosts file which I located alreadty. When I try to add a single letter, I get rejected: But this leaves me quite confused, this is my laptop, and I do not have permission? Is there a way to do this differently ?

I'm using Spatie's mutlti-tenancy package to implement multi-tenancy on my app. I'm using the multiple database approach, and at the moment I'm unsure what should go in my .env file, so I've got DB_DATABASE=landlord in there to point to my landlord database. I then use the DomainTenantFinder and it works quite well. I do have an issue though, usually when I want to indicate a model should use the tenant database connection, I include the following in the model:

I am trying to import a sql dump into a cockroachdb and getting the following error:

I want to implement a database-level multi-tenancy feature that allows me to add databases dynamically. I haven't found a way to do this in Rails6. Can Rails6's multi-database feature dynamically recognize a new database if it's added while the application is running?

If anyone knows, please advise.

Is it possible to access Azure DevOps APIs which will call APIs like these:

• repositories https://vssps.dev.azure.com/{organization}/_apis/git/repositories?api-version=6.1-preview.1

• list of users https://vssps.dev.azure.com/{organization}/_apis/graph/users?api-version=6.1-preview.1

I have create an app and allowed Azure DevOps API See here

I know I can create an app in Azure DevOps account. But the reason I want to access from here is due to the multi-tenancy.

What would be the urls to get list of Azure DevOps repositories and users

Is there a way to enabled/disable a realm in Keycloak? I'm happy with either UI or API.

A bit of background information: I have a multi-tenancy setup with a lot of different realms in Keycloak and I might want to make it impossible to login to some of them.

I know this can be achieved by simply deleting the realm but then I'd have to do a complete new realm configuration if I decided to enable/activate that realm again.