ldc | LaunchDarkly command-line tool/shell | Access Management library
kandi X-RAY | ldc Summary
kandi X-RAY | ldc Summary
LaunchDarkly command-line tool/shell (beta)
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- addFlagCommands adds the flags to the shell
- createShell creates a new shell
- roll rollout command .
- editFile edit a file
- Fallthru is the same as fallback .
- updateConfig updates the config argument
- addConfig adds a new config .
- addGoalCommands adds the goal commands to the shell
- renderFlag renders a FeatureFlag .
- preRunCmd is responsible for pre - run commands
ldc Key Features
ldc Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ldc
QUESTION
I'm running the following benchmark on Java 17:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-04 at 21:54I assume that the costs of calling String.valueOf() within benchmark method remained the same
It is not. In the first case, the method argument is constant, so JIT can apply the Constant Propagation optimization.
Consider a very simplified example:
QUESTION
Context
I'm working on a Kotlin program which runs on the JVM and consumes large amounts of memory. While I do trust the garbage collector to (eventually) free memory used by objects which are no longer reachable, I don't trust future maintainers of the project (including my future self) – especially as the project progresses and becomes more evolved - to write the code in a way that makes sure that objects which are no longer needed are indeed unreachable.
So in order to reduce the risk, as part of my testing suite (which is already exhaustive with regards to the logic of the program's functionality) I'm also writing (or trying to write, with different degrees of success) various tests which aim to ensure that references aren't kept to objects which have run their course.
As this is quite difficult to do directly, the technique I'm using in the tests is to employ objects with finalizers, simulate the conditions when they're no longer needed, force garbage collection, and assert the finalizers have indeed run. (Note: my question is not about this technique per se, but if someone has comments or ideas for improvement or can propose alternatives – I'll be interested to hear!).
This generally works well, and can be shown to do the job, e.g. in TDD style: I write naive code which does the job as far as the business logic is concerned but doesn't take care of losing references to old objects, I write a test as described above, I make sure that the test fails, I add code to take care of memory (e.g., in simple cases, set references to null), and then see that the test passes.
My question
For some reason, my tests don't always work (clarification: I don't mean that they fail non-deterministically; I mean that some of the tests consistently work and some consistently fail). The real examples from the project contain lots of intricate, proprietary details, but I've managed to boil it down to the following minimal example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 16:20It seems, Kotlin’s println(…) function has a different behavior than Java’s System.out.println(…) statement, regarding the order of evaluation.
In Java when you write
QUESTION
WITH
cust AS
(SELECT DISTINCT
C.swCustomerId AS EnduserId,
A.AssetID AS asset,
suite.ctName AS Product
FROM ReplicaCADS.dbo.TransactionHeader TH WITH (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN ReplicaCRMDB.dbo.SW_CUSTOMER C WITH (NOLOCK) ON C.swCustomerId = TH.EndUserCustomerId
INNER JOIN ReplicaCADS.dbo.Asset A WITH (NOLOCK) ON TH.TransactionId = A.TransactionId
AND A.Status = 'Active'
INNER JOIN ReplicaCADS.dbo.AssetComponent AC WITH (NOLOCK) ON AC.AssetId = A.AssetId
AND AC.PrimaryFlag = 1
AND AC.Status = 'Active'
INNER JOIN ReplicaCADS.dbo.MaintenanceProgram MP WITH (NOLOCK) ON MP.AssetId = A.AssetId
AND IsLatest = 1
AND MP.Status = 'Active'
AND MP.EndDate <> '2099-12-31 00:00:00.000'
AND MP.MaintenanceType = 'Core'
INNER JOIN ReplicaCRMDB.dbo.[ct_Product_Suite] suite WITH (NOLOCK) ON suite.ctSuiteID = A.ProductSuiteID
AND suite.cTName LIKE 'DaaS'
INNER JOIN Salesforce.[dbo].[Apttus__APTS_Agreement__c] agr ON agr.Vantive_Org_ID__c = C.ctOrgId
AND Apttus__Status__c = 'Activated'
AND Agreement_Type__c = 'Licensing'
AND agr.Account_Geo__c LIKE 'APAC'
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM salesforce..Priority_Customer__c pr
WHERE pr.Account_Org_Id__c = C.CtOrgId)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ReplicaTransactionData..[Transaction] TN
WHERE TN.CustomerId = C.swCustomerId
AND Status = 'Pending'
AND QuoteType IS NULL)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM [Salesforce]..Large_Customer__c LDC
WHERE LDC.Org_ID__c = C.ctOrgId)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM [Salesforce].dbo.Account sac
WHERE sac.Org_ID__C = C.ctOrgId
AND High_Touch_Account__C = 'true')
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM salesforce..Priority_Customer__c pr
WHERE pr.Account_Org_Id__c = C.ctOrgId)
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM Salesforce..Asset_Maintenance_Program__c
WHERE frmAccount_Org_ID__c = C.ctOrgId
AND Maintenance_Type__c IN ('Advanced'))
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ReplicaCADS..AssetpricingData AP
WHERE AP.AssetId = A.AssetId))
SELECT TOP 1
P.swLogin AS LoginId
FROM cust
INNER JOIN ReplicaCRMDB.dbo.SW_PERSON P WITH (NOLOCK) ON P.swCustomerId = EnduserId
AND P.swStatus = 'Current'
AND SWLogin IS NOT NULL
AND P.ctLocale = 'en-US'
INNER JOIN ReplicaCRMDB.dbo.CT_CONTACT_TYPE Contact WITH (NOLOCK) ON Contact.swContactId = P.swPersonId
INNER JOIN ReplicaCRMDB.dbo.CT_MC_USERS MCUsers ON MCUsers.swPersonID = P.swPersonId
AND (MCUsers.ctPassword = '32CA9FC1A0F5B6330E3F4C8C1BBECDE9BEDB9573'
OR MCUsers.ctPassword = '')
ORDER BY NEWID();
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-22 at 10:53This can be massively helped by understanding how SQL works. But I would recommend that you remove most of the text fields in the joins, and using their int values instead that I suppose exist.
For instance - High_Touch_Account__C = 'true', this should probably be stored as a BIT inside of the DB, and as such, 1 or 0 would be the way to go, not 'true'. Similarily the Status = 'Active' should probably be replaced with using the int value for 'Active'.
Regarding the and not exists, I would probably create a temporary table at the start that gathers all of the things that you do not want in there, then simply do a left join and then "where join is null" basically. This could replace 25% of your code.
NOLOCK might also be something that you should look into.
If you upload the files with the data, It would be easier however to give you a reply on the most optimal way to do this, but as it sits, we've got no idea of what data exists.
QUESTION
I am using PyTorch to simulate NNs on a quantum computer, and therefore I have to use tensors with ComplexFloatTensor datatypes. When I run this line of code on GPU:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 19:05I figured out the answer to this question myself in the meantime. As it turns out, my GPU simply ran out of memory.
For some reason, Google Colab showed this error correctly (see above), while my own GPU showed this weird CUBLAS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED error, instead of directly telling me that it is a memory issue.
QUESTION
I am trying to write a compiler for an esoteric programming language that compiles to Java Bytecode. I'm trying to use Javassist to generate the bytecode.
I got stuck when trying to generate branching/looping code. For example, let's say I'm generating the code for:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 09:43Thanks to Holger's comment, I was able to figure out that I actually needed a StackMapTable, not a StackMap. And I indeed need a stack map table entry at every branch destination.
QUESTION
I am researching IL code which generated from this C# code (RELEASE):
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-19 at 10:39QUESTION
I'm working on a project in the D language and I want to use a module from the standard library called std.sumtype. I'm on debian oldstable, and I've tried both GDC and LDC. DMD is unavailable, because I'm using a machine with an armhf architecture. Neither of these compilers can find std.sumtype, despite it being in the standard library. I also tried downloading 3 different versions of sumtype.d from the phobos repositories of all three D compilers. Each of these would not compile. How can I use this? Am I on the wrong version?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 20:49std.sumtype is a pretty new package that was added in 2.097.0: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.097.0.html#std-sumtype so the debian oldstable packages probably don't have it yet as you would need at least:
- DMD 2.097.0
- LDC 1.27.0 (beta.1 or above)
- upcoming GDC in May 2022 (see announcement)
If you want to use the latest compiler you could always download the latest LDC archive and extract it somewhere and run it from there or use the install.sh script from the download page for portable and multiple simultaneous installs.
std.sumtype is an adoption of the dub package sumtype so if you are using dub, you can depend on that as well and not need to get another compiler outside the package manager.
QUESTION
Changes on our LDAP Server have changed the case of the attributes returned from search. For example, "mailroutingaddress" is now "mailRoutingAddress". The searches themselves are case insensitive, but the python code processing the returned ldap object is attempting to reference attributes in all lower case and failing.
Is there a simple way to specify that the LDAP module should lowercase all returned attributes? Or, is there a straightforward way to change them to lowercase as soon as the results are returned?
We're trying to avoid extensive rewrites to handle this change in our LDAP software.
This code returns an error "Key not found"
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-14 at 02:28You can change a dict's keys to lowercase pretty easily with a dict comprehension:
QUESTION
I would like to create a rectangular multidimensional array at runtime, such that the entire array is stored in a contiguous block of memory. It is not necessary for the array to be resizable after its initial creation. Effectively, I want to create a static array at runtime, but I would accept an approach that satisfies the stated conditions even if the array is technically of a different type.
More formally, I would like to take two ulongs nr and nc, and create an array arr at runtime such that arr[r][c] is equivalent to *(arr.ptr + r * nc + c), both in terms of what it evaluates to, and the efficiency with which it does so. (*(arr.ptr + c * nr + r) would also be acceptable, although I don't imagine D would use column-major order.)
Is there a way to do this in D?
The closest I've gotten is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-22 at 20:23Static and dynamic arrays in D have different layout in memory.
A dynamic array is a reference type, and a static array is a value type.
So, there is no way to cast a block of memory into a multidimensional dynamic array.
Instead you will have to create your own type with an overloaded indexing operator.
Basic example:
QUESTION
The goal is to train BERT SRL on another data set. According to configuration, it requires conll-formatted-ontonotes-5.0.
Natively, my data comes in a CoNLL format and I converted it to the conll-formatted-ontonotes-5.0 format of the GitHub edition of OntoNotes v.5.0. Reading the data works and training seems to work, except that precision remains at 0. I suspect that either the encoding of SRL arguments (BOI or phrasal?) or the column structure (other OntoNotes editions in CoNLL format differ here) differ from the expected input. Alternatively, the error may arise because if the role labels are hard-wired in the code. I followed the reference data in using the long form (ARGM-TMP), but you often see the short form (AM-TMP) in other data.
The question is which dataset and format is expected here. I guess it's one of the CoNLL/Skel formats for OntoNotes 5.0 with a restored WORD column, but
The CoNLL edition doesn't seem to be shipped with the LDC edition of OntoNotes
It does not seem to be the format of the "conll-formatted-ontonotes-5.0" edition of OntoNotes v.5.0 on GitHub provided by the OntoNotes creators.
There is at least one other CoNLL/Skel edition of OntoNotes 5.0 data as part of PropBank. This differs from the other one in leaving out 3 columns and in the encoding of predicates. (For parts of my data, this is the native format.)
The SrlReader documentation mentions BIO (IOBES) encoding. This has been used in other CoNLL editions of PropBank data, indeed, but not in the above-mentioned OntoNotes corpora. Other such formats are the CoNLL-2008 and CoNLL-2009 formats, for example, and different variants.
Before I start reverse-engineering the SrlReader, does anyone have a data snippet at hand so that I can prepare my data accordingly?
conll-formatted-ontonotes-5.0 version of my data (sample from EWT corpus):
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-15 at 16:27The "native" format is the one under of the CoNLL-2012 edition, see cemantix.org/conll/2012/data.html how to create it.
The Ontonotes class that reads it may, however, encounter difficulties when parsing "native" CoNLL-2012 data, because the CoNLL-2012 preprocessing scripts can lead to invalid parse trees. Parsing with NLTK will naturally lead to a ValueError such as
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ldc
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
