legendre | Get control of your zombie EC2 instances | Game Engine library
kandi X-RAY | legendre Summary
kandi X-RAY | legendre Summary
Get control of your zombie instances.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Notify about dead instances
- Find stale app instances
- List all running instances
- Find named instances
- Find problematic instances
- Get the expected SHA for a given tier
- Notify a zombie instance
- Uploads a lambda function
- Create IAM role
- Get VPC configuration
legendre Key Features
legendre Examples and Code Snippets
def Gower_Legendre(original, test, absent=0, type='Set'):
"""
Gower and Legendre coefficient for nominal or ordinal data.
Coefficient: M{(A + D) / ((0.5 * (B + C)) + A + D)}
@param original: list of original data
@pa
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on legendre
QUESTION
This code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 10:17add this in your theme : +theme(axis.text=element_text(size=20), legend.text = element_text(size=10))
but do know there are several options for core text, titles, etc. This page lists the options : https://www.statology.org/ggplot2-legend-size/
QUESTION
I want to implement the composite Gaussian quadrature in Python to evaluate the integral ∫01 ex2 dx. Evaluting this using Python's quad command, I get ∫01 ex2 dx ≈ 1.46
Below is my attempt at implementing this in Python. What I expect is that as n gets larger, the closer the quadrature gets to the 'real' integral. However, as I vary n, the results gets smaller and smaller. What mistake am I making?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-03 at 19:27Here is the working code based on your attempt:
QUESTION
I am trying to plot the polynomial interpolation using legendre nodes by solving the system of linear equations (which gives the Vandermonde matrix). I'm doing this for j = 5, 7, 9,...,35.
Here is my code :
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-08 at 10:25Your coeff_vector_3
is still symbolic, since you used vpasolve
. To pass them to polyval
, convert them to doubles first.
QUESTION
I'm working on calculation of Legendre Polynomial on GPU.
Briefly, Recursive Legendre Polynomial is computing the n-th order by (n-1)th and (n-2)th order. We divide the x
into k
(let's say k=23) parts to compute polynomial and do a summation, which would be more precise.
So my kernel goes below.
- First, we create a
k * width
array.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-01 at 16:42As has been pointed out, CUDA makes no statements about the order of thread execution. However you have a number of points in your calculation sequence where you expect a previous line of code has been completed in its entirety, across the entire grid, in order for the next section of your code to be correct.
Generally the nature of CUDA parallel thread execution means that such dependencies lead to incorrect/broken code.
I haven't tried to fully realize your algorithm in an optimal way, but to demonstrate the proof of this, I have broken up your kernel code in such a way that such dependencies are made "correct" through the use of the kernel-call boundary, which is effectively a global sync. This is probably one way to sort out your problem, as indicated in the comments.
Here's an example. I'm not going to try to detail each change, but by breaking it up this way I believe I have satisfied the dependencies expected using your approach. I have not fully verified anything, but a quick check suggests the output seems to match your matlab output:
QUESTION
I usually work with ROOT and its powerful MINUIT interpolation classes in a C++ environment. For reason related to plotting and ease of data handling, I switched recently to Python 3.8. The problem is that I can't find a library that allows me to set my custom interpolation function (1D by now, multivariate in the future)! Scipy
and Pandas
have preset methods
, and I am not aware of other libraries for interpolation. It seems to me quite impossible, therefore I ask you!
What I need to reproduce is something that sounds like this in ROOT:
DEFINITION OF THE INTERPOLATING FUNCTION
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-25 at 20:14I would suggest using iminuit. You'd need to rearrange your C++ syntax to iminuit's Python syntax, but from there on, it's a minimal change because it is MINUIT.
(LMFIT also looks promising, but since you're already using MINUIT, it would be a smoother transition to iminuit.)
QUESTION
I am trying to apply code from the question answer taken from: Use scipy.integrate.quad with Tensorflow to my problem. For more simplicity - I want to integrate three 2D arrays containing Legendre polynomials of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd degrees, respectively.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-11 at 22:39Ok based on your update to the question, here's the code that hopefully works for you (tested). I've omitted 'i' and the integration goes from 0.0 ... 10.0 but you can modify to include that. The main idea is that if you want to use the tensor's value in a python function, you first need to convert it to its value by the numpy()
method.
QUESTION
I am trying to calculate the 720th Legendre polynomial with scipy:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-09 at 22:35It's probably a float
overflow error. If you use the monic
keyword of the legendre
function you get non-nan
coefficients:
QUESTION
# import packages we need later
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-27 at 19:20By looking at those numbers I realized I can construct them from math.
1/(len(curve1)-1)*2
, ie 1/39*2
returns: 0.05128205128205128
1+1/(len(curve1)-1)*2
ie 1+1/39*2
returns: `1.05
Which are the numbers we were looking for.
I still don't know how it is displayed when executing legendrefit_curve1
in a Jupyter Notebook cell, but that is less of the point.
I don't know why the formula above works, it'll probably be a question on math.stackexchange.com.
QUESTION
Python newbie here, I'm struggling to find the right idiom for applying a function over an array.
I want to compute an associated Legendre polynomial from -1 to 1,
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-18 at 06:02It's simpler than that, and I don't think there's a reason to use enumerate. The following code should suffice:
QUESTION
I am looking for an algorithm that could factorize numbers based on numbers it already factorized. In other words, I am searching for a fast algorithm to factorise all numbers up to a given number, and store them in a (I guess this is the easiest data structure to use) list / tuple of tuples. I am looking for an "up to n" algorithm because I need all numbers up to "n", and I guess it's faster than just checking one by one.
I want this algorithm to work within a reasonable time (less than an hour) for 2*10^8, for a program I am running. I have tried one of the more naive approaches in python, finding all primes up to "n" first, and then for each number "k" finding it's prime factorization by checking each prime until one divides it (we will call it p), then it's factorization is the factorization of k/p + p.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-03 at 16:12You can use the first part of your script in order to do that!
Code:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install legendre
You can use legendre like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page