problem | go library that implements application | JSON Processing library

I'm going to rewrite your code because it seems to be missing something.

In this code, I'm using a single event handler. Then using a counter and switch statement to determine the current click count.

If your sample input is accurate, some of your column 13 contain trailing whitespace. If you want to treat them as being the same value, you can trim it.

For example, before using column 13, you could do:

You are writing message.text into the database inside the photo function. However, that function is only triggered for messages containing a photo. When the message contains a photo, message.text is None. Any caption the photo might have will be in message.caption.

I'm unsure if the problem is my code or if I found a compiler bug.

The problem is your code. In GNU assembler, parentheses are used to dereference like unary * is in C, and you can only dereference a register, not memory. As such, writing 12(%0) in the assembly when %0 might be memory is wrong. It only happens to work in GCC because GCC chooses to use a register for "rm" there, while Clang chooses to use memory. You should use "r" (bytes) instead.

Also, you need to tell the compiler that your assembly is going to modify the array, either with a memory clobber or by adding *(unsigned char (*)[16])bytes as an output. Right now, it's allowed to optimize your printf to just hardcode what the values were at the beginning of the program.

Fixed code:

try require('dotenv').config()

I don't believe you can use SharedPreferences within an Isolate without support for MethodChannel / accessing platform-specific underlying OS frameworks on iOS / Android.

You would need to use FlutterIsolate or a similar package to provide that support.

chunhunghan has a good answer detailing this.

Alternatively, you could run the crypt.generateKeys() by itself in your Isolate.spawn() call and use the results after in a separate method accessing SharedPreferences. (Assuming that crypt package is also not relying on platform-specific code.)

You should use cache.asMap().remove(key) as you suspected. The other call delegates to this, but does not return the value because that is not idiomatic for a cache.

The Cache interface is opinionated for how one should commonly use a cache, while the asMap() view is more raw to allow for advanced operations. For example, you generally wouldn't iterate over a cache (e.g. memcached doesn't allow this), but if you need to then the Map provides that support. All calls flow into the same backing structure, so there will be no inconsistency. The APIs merely try to nudge users towards best practices, but strive to not block a developer from getting their work done safely and correctly.

Apparently the webhook must pass through a web server and not to jenkins directly, So I configured nginx as a reverse proxy to jenkins server and it worked fine.

One way would be to use the place with relx, rely, relheight and relwidth.

Here is a minimal example: