slack-notify | A Dockerized tool for sending messages to Slack channels | Chat library
kandi X-RAY | slack-notify Summary
kandi X-RAY | slack-notify Summary
A Dockerized tool for sending messages to Slack channels
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Generate a webhook message .
- send sends a webhook to the endpoint
- envOr returns the environment variable or the default if it exists .
slack-notify Key Features
slack-notify Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on slack-notify
QUESTION
Below is my GitHub workflow
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 06:17There is an issue on Github about this. You need to add condition like below:
QUESTION
I'm currently using the Release Drafter workflow that creates a draft release whenever a PR is merged into the develop
branch (staging). This creates a great draft but now I'm wanting to have it get published when develop is merged into master. When that takes place I need to update the release name and tag before publishing. Then send out a notification in our slack engineering channel.
What I can do:
- Setup the action on push into master.
- Get the latest draft release and then use that id as a ref.
- Publish using eregon/publish-release action.
- Send the slack message
What I missing:
- An Action that I can pass the release id and update the tag and name.
The name and tag will be the current date %Y.%m%.d-%H:%M
Here is the action YML I have created so far
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-17 at 15:55You can add a step that updates the release draft using Github's REST API:
QUESTION
We currently have a GitHub repository where our master
branch is protected for everyone except admins, who are able to commit and push directly to the branch without first opening a pull request. We're looking to find a way to send a Slack notification anytime an admin commits directly to master
in order to call attention to the fact that there was an override of the branch protections. This may happen intentionally due to extreme circumstances or, worst case, by mistake (which will need to be addressed).
This seems like it'd be possible with a combination of the GitHub Slack action, the if
key on the job/step definition, and ideally some piece of information from the push
event JSON.
The last part is where I'm stuck: I don't see an obvious way to use the data contained in the push
event to differentiate between one-off commits that would violate our branch protection policy and a normal/compliant pull request.
Does anyone have any ideas as to whether or not this is possible? Perhaps there's another event that I should be attaching this workflow to that would give me the information I'd need to tell the difference and launch the Slack notification?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 22:06In general, using GitHub Actions to do this kind of notification is problematic because the user can simply remove or neutralize the code that reports this and then push to the main branch. The Actions workflow that's used will be the one pushed into the repo as part of that commit, so this won't be an effective control.
You'd want to probably instead use a webhook to notify a service of this fact and then look at the HEAD
commit, parse the commit message to extract the PR number, and verify that the second parent of the commit is the same as the head of the PR. Note that this won't work if you're using squash merges, because there's no easy way to verify that the commit created by a squash merge is the same as the one created by the branch from which it was created.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install slack-notify
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page