blockingQueues | goroutine safe queues , useful as resource pools

 by   theodesp Go Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | blockingQueues Summary

kandi X-RAY | blockingQueues Summary

blockingQueues is a Go library. blockingQueues has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitLab, GitHub.

Simple, performant, goroutine safe queues, useful as resource pools or job queues.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              blockingQueues has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 17 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of blockingQueues is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              blockingQueues has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              blockingQueues has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              blockingQueues is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              blockingQueues releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed blockingQueues and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into blockingQueues implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • NewLinkedBlockingQueue creates a new BlockingQueue with the given capacity .
            • NewArrayBlockingQueue creates a new queue with the given capacity .
            • Offer adds an item to the queue if it is not nil .
            • NewConcurrentRingBuffer returns a new ConcurrentRingBuffer .
            • NewLinkedListStore returns a new LinkedListStore .
            • NewArrayStore creates a new ArrayStore .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            blockingQueues Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for blockingQueues.

            blockingQueues Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for blockingQueues.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Best way to enqueue events received from websocket for asynchronous processing
            Asked 2020-Feb-09 at 09:29

            I have a java application receiving events from Discord's websocket using JDA, my goal is to enqueue these events (I've been using LinkedBlockingQueues, but if there's a better tool for that suggestions are very much welcome) for processing on multiple object instances (Consumers) asynchronously, each with their own queue.

            Note that there might and will be queues that need to operate on the same element, thus just sharing the queue between threads would not work.

            First thing I tried was to clone the blocking queue using

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Feb-09 at 08:51

            Why not just share the queue vs cloning it across multiple threads?

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60134161

            QUESTION

            How to subscribe to merged infinite flowables?
            Asked 2019-Oct-18 at 06:58

            I have a couple of infinite Flowables (getting data from BlockingQueues). I merge them and subscribe with my custom subscriber. I don't understand why I get messages only from a single input Flowable.

            Here is my code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Oct-18 at 06:58

            Because you are blocking the only thread servicing all sources by the first queue. You have to introduce asynchrony such as applying .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io()) in createFlowable.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58432142

            QUESTION

            Not sure if its best to use a wrapper class or static for a variable that needs to be seen by multiple threads
            Asked 2019-Sep-13 at 19:17

            I am still learning about java and need a recommendation on best practices.

            Here is the scenerio:

            1. An encrypted file comes in
            2. A java app picks up the file when it comes.
            3. The java app from the class that listens for the file, in its main method creates 5 blockingqueues (for the consumers), starts up a producer and 5 consumer threads.
            4. The producer thread reads the file and creates 1 big object consisting of 5 other smaller objects within it.
            5. The producer thread then puts each big object into the blockingqueues.
            6. Each consumer thread looks into its own blockingqueue, retrieves the big object, then it retrieves 1 of the 5 smaller objects and writes a file with the information related to that 1 small object.

            my problem: If anything goes wrong in the producer thread while its reading the file, I want the listening class (the one that starts everything up) to know about it so that it can change the extension of the encrypted file to .err

            I also want the other 5 consumer threads to know if something wrong occurs in the producer thread so that they can also change the extension of the file that each creates to .err

            Not sure if a wrapper class would be recommended more in this scenerio that I pass into the blockingqueue or to use a static variable in the listening or producer class that all the threads can look at to know if an error occurred. Thank you for your help

            or if there is a better solution please let me know

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Sep-13 at 19:17

            What if instead of having each child thread write out their results to a file, the results were aggregated back to a result handler? This way if there was an error, the result handler can handle it appropriately (by adding the .err extension).

            Most of the performance advantages of concurrency have to do with better CPU usage, but since you're writing to a single piece of hardware (disk, probably) there really isn't an advantage to doing that concurrently anyway.

            The main disadvantage to this approach would be that your memory overhead would be a little bigger, since you would have to keep the outputs from each consumer in memory until all five had finished writing, instead of being able to have them each finish and persist separately. Honestly, you'll have to do that anyway, since an error in one consumer could happen after some other consumer had already finished and persisted.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57928827

            QUESTION

            Spring Autowired Shared Queue NullPointerException
            Asked 2018-Sep-18 at 13:51

            I'm using Spring for the first time and am trying to implement a shared queue wherein a Kafka listener puts messages on the shared queue, and a ThreadManager that will eventually do something multithreaded with the items it takes off the shared queue. Here is my current implementation:

            The Listener:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Sep-17 at 21:47

            You use Spring´s programatic, so called 'JavaConfig', way of setting up Spring beans (classes annotated with @Configuration with methods annotated with @Bean). Usually at application startup Spring will call those @Bean methods under the hood and register them in it's application context (if scope is singleton - the default - this will happen only once!). No need to call those @Bean methods anywhere in your code directly... you must not, otherwise you will get a separate, fresh instance that possibly is not fully configured!

            Instead, you need to inject the BlockingQueue that you 'configured' in your QueueConfig.blockingQueue() method into your ThreadManager. Since the queue seems to be a mandatory dependency for the ThreadManager to work, I'd let Spring inject it via constructor:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52375616

            QUESTION

            Object pool using blocking queue runs in deadlock
            Asked 2018-Sep-07 at 05:27

            I have an java application running in a payara 5.

            I need to pool some engine objects (from a library) that my beans will use. Creating the engines needs to be done in a separate thread.

            Therefor I came up with my EnginePool and my EngineProducer. The idea is that the EnginePool manages two BlockingQueues. One for available engines and one for engines that were used by a bean and need to become available again. The EnginePool should be only available once so it is a singleton.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Sep-07 at 05:27

            Problem is that the container manages all concurrency. In case of a singleton that means that all accesses on fields will be get a write lock.

            Solution is to use the @ConcurrencyManagement(BEAN) annotation. This means that the bean takes control of the concurrency management and must assure that synchronization is done.

            Detailed explanation can be found here.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52203641

            QUESTION

            Is it valid to pass netty channels to a queue and use it for writes on a different thread later on?
            Asked 2017-Dec-13 at 07:52

            I have the following setup. There is a message distributor that spreads inbound client messages across a configured number of message queues (LinkedBlockingQueues in my case), based on an unique identifier called appId (per connected client):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Dec-12 at 16:14

            Yes it is valid to call Channel.* methods from other threads. That said the methods perform best when these are called from the EventLoop thread itself that belongs to the Channel.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47762213

            QUESTION

            WorkerThread: Wait for processing done (BlockingQueue)
            Asked 2017-Aug-24 at 22:35

            im an building a multithreaded application, using WorkerThreads which process Tasks from BlockingQueues. The worker looks as follws (as an abstract class. subclasses implement processItem()).

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Aug-24 at 22:35

            OK, since general ExecutorService is not enough perhaps ForkJoinPool will work, it does not expose queue explicitly, but should be very easy to use given what you have described.

            Key method is awaitQuiescence(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) which will wait until all submitted tasks have finished execution.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45864453

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install blockingQueues

            You can download it from GitLab, GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/theodesp/blockingQueues.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone theodesp/blockingQueues

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:theodesp/blockingQueues.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link