blockingQueues | goroutine safe queues , useful as resource pools
kandi X-RAY | blockingQueues Summary
kandi X-RAY | blockingQueues Summary
Simple, performant, goroutine safe queues, useful as resource pools or job queues.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- NewLinkedBlockingQueue creates a new BlockingQueue with the given capacity .
- NewArrayBlockingQueue creates a new queue with the given capacity .
- Offer adds an item to the queue if it is not nil .
- NewConcurrentRingBuffer returns a new ConcurrentRingBuffer .
- NewLinkedListStore returns a new LinkedListStore .
- NewArrayStore creates a new ArrayStore .
blockingQueues Key Features
blockingQueues Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on blockingQueues
QUESTION
I have a java application receiving events from Discord's websocket using JDA, my goal is to enqueue these events (I've been using LinkedBlockingQueues, but if there's a better tool for that suggestions are very much welcome) for processing on multiple object instances (Consumers) asynchronously, each with their own queue.
Note that there might and will be queues that need to operate on the same element, thus just sharing the queue between threads would not work.
First thing I tried was to clone the blocking queue using
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-09 at 08:51Why not just share the queue vs cloning it across multiple threads?
QUESTION
I have a couple of infinite Flowables (getting data from BlockingQueues). I merge them and subscribe with my custom subscriber. I don't understand why I get messages only from a single input Flowable.
Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-18 at 06:58Because you are blocking the only thread servicing all sources by the first queue. You have to introduce asynchrony such as applying .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
in createFlowable
.
QUESTION
I am still learning about java and need a recommendation on best practices.
Here is the scenerio:
- An encrypted file comes in
- A java app picks up the file when it comes.
- The java app from the class that listens for the file, in its main method creates 5 blockingqueues (for the consumers), starts up a producer and 5 consumer threads.
- The producer thread reads the file and creates 1 big object consisting of 5 other smaller objects within it.
- The producer thread then puts each big object into the blockingqueues.
- Each consumer thread looks into its own blockingqueue, retrieves the big object, then it retrieves 1 of the 5 smaller objects and writes a file with the information related to that 1 small object.
my problem: If anything goes wrong in the producer thread while its reading the file, I want the listening class (the one that starts everything up) to know about it so that it can change the extension of the encrypted file to .err
I also want the other 5 consumer threads to know if something wrong occurs in the producer thread so that they can also change the extension of the file that each creates to .err
Not sure if a wrapper class would be recommended more in this scenerio that I pass into the blockingqueue or to use a static variable in the listening or producer class that all the threads can look at to know if an error occurred. Thank you for your help
or if there is a better solution please let me know
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-13 at 19:17What if instead of having each child thread write out their results to a file, the results were aggregated back to a result handler? This way if there was an error, the result handler can handle it appropriately (by adding the .err extension).
Most of the performance advantages of concurrency have to do with better CPU usage, but since you're writing to a single piece of hardware (disk, probably) there really isn't an advantage to doing that concurrently anyway.
The main disadvantage to this approach would be that your memory overhead would be a little bigger, since you would have to keep the outputs from each consumer in memory until all five had finished writing, instead of being able to have them each finish and persist separately. Honestly, you'll have to do that anyway, since an error in one consumer could happen after some other consumer had already finished and persisted.
QUESTION
I'm using Spring for the first time and am trying to implement a shared queue wherein a Kafka listener puts messages on the shared queue, and a ThreadManager that will eventually do something multithreaded with the items it takes off the shared queue. Here is my current implementation:
The Listener:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-17 at 21:47You use Spring´s programatic, so called 'JavaConfig', way of setting up Spring beans (classes annotated with @Configuration
with methods annotated with @Bean
). Usually at application startup Spring will call those @Bean
methods under the hood and register them in it's application context (if scope is singleton - the default - this will happen only once!). No need to call those @Bean
methods anywhere in your code directly... you must not, otherwise you will get a separate, fresh instance that possibly is not fully configured!
Instead, you need to inject the BlockingQueue
that you 'configured' in your QueueConfig.blockingQueue()
method into your ThreadManager
. Since the queue seems to be a mandatory dependency for the ThreadManager
to work, I'd let Spring inject it via constructor:
QUESTION
I have an java application running in a payara 5.
I need to pool some engine objects (from a library) that my beans will use. Creating the engines needs to be done in a separate thread.
Therefor I came up with my EnginePool and my EngineProducer. The idea is that the EnginePool manages two BlockingQueues. One for available engines and one for engines that were used by a bean and need to become available again. The EnginePool should be only available once so it is a singleton.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-07 at 05:27Problem is that the container manages all concurrency. In case of a singleton that means that all accesses on fields will be get a write lock.
Solution is to use the @ConcurrencyManagement(BEAN) annotation. This means that the bean takes control of the concurrency management and must assure that synchronization is done.
Detailed explanation can be found here.
QUESTION
I have the following setup. There is a message distributor that spreads inbound client messages across a configured number of message queues (LinkedBlockingQueues in my case), based on an unique identifier called appId (per connected client):
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Dec-12 at 16:14Yes it is valid to call Channel.*
methods from other threads. That said the methods perform best when these are called from the EventLoop
thread itself that belongs to the Channel
.
QUESTION
im an building a multithreaded application, using WorkerThreads which process Tasks from BlockingQueues. The worker looks as follws (as an abstract class. subclasses implement processItem()).
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-24 at 22:35OK, since general ExecutorService
is not enough perhaps ForkJoinPool
will work, it does not expose queue explicitly, but should be very easy to use given what you have described.
Key method is awaitQuiescence(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
which will wait until all submitted tasks have finished execution.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install blockingQueues
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page