sequence | High performance sequential log analyzer | Parser library

Since your data seems simple, you can open you data using pandas, do whatever operation you need and then use to_json() function to save again.

Here is the example

It gives out a "false" because Prolog is unsure whether there are more solutions after the first one it provides:

There's no way to insert and automatically push all the other sequence numbers up. You need to do that explicitly.

While editing my initial question to add more context as Jay proposed I think it found the issue.

What probably happens? The view where the crash is, contains a table view. Each cell will be configured before being presented. I use a flag which holds the information, if the amount of weight for this cell (it is a strength workout app) has been initially set or is a change. When prepareForReuse is being called, this flag has not been reset. And that now means scrolling through the table view triggers a DB write for each reused cell, that leads to unnecessary writes to the db. Unnecessary, because the exact same number is already saved in the db.

My speculation: Scrolling fast could maybe lead to a race condition (I have read something about that issue with realm) and that maybe causes this weird crash, because there are multiple single writes initiated in a short time.

Solution: I now reset the flag on prepareForReuse to its initial value to prevent this misbehaviour.

The crash only happens when the cell is set up and the described behaviour happens. Therefor I'm quite confident I fixed the issue finally. Let's see. -- I was not able to reproduce the issue, but it also only happens pretty rare.

You can store them with a GADT, like this:

Yes, your double lambda approach does work. But there are nicer ways to do this too.

It turns out define can do this directly. The following two pieces of code are identical:

Let's revamp the sequences and try the scenarios.

Perform the following changes to extract the correct error message from the response and to validate in the Filter

• Update the property mediator in the out-sequence as following to specify the path up to the leaf node to extract the error message

The example you are using receives the data as a byte array already, but it appends hex representation to the data as string. This is why you get your data in both representations.

You will need to change the example in the file BluetoothLeService.java on line 149. It is currently reading
intent.putExtra(EXTRA_DATA, new String(data) + "\n" + stringBuilder.toString());

and you would need to change it to
intent.putExtra(EXTRA_DATA, new String(data) + "\n");

if you want to receive only the string representation.

Here's a fairly straightforward way where we test the sign of the lagged difference. If the mid_sum difference sign is the same as the final_sum difference sign, they are "consistent".