zrepl | One-stop ZFS backup & replication solution | Continuous Backup library

by zrepl Go Version: v0.6.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | zrepl Summary

zrepl is a Go library typically used in Backup Recovery, Continuous Backup applications. zrepl has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

zrepl is written in Go and uses Go modules to manage dependencies. The documentation is written in ReStructured Text using the Sphinx framework. Install build dependencies using ./lazy.sh devsetup. lazy.sh uses python3-pip to fetch the build dependencies for the docs - you might want to use a venv. If you just want to install the Go dependencies, run ./lazy.sh godep. The test suite is split into pure Go tests (make test-go) and platform tests that interact with ZFS and thus generally require root privileges (sudo make test-platform). Platform tests run on their own pool with the name zreplplatformtest, which is created using the file vdev in /tmp. For a full code coverage profile, run make test-go COVER=1 && sudo make test-platform && make cover-merge. An HTML report can be generated using make cover-html. Code generation is triggered by make generate. Generated code is committed to the source tree.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

zrepl has a low active ecosystem.

It has 606 star(s) with 80 fork(s). There are 34 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 175 open issues and 339 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 191 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of zrepl is v0.6.0

Quality

zrepl has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

zrepl has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

zrepl code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

zrepl is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

zrepl releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are available. Examples and code snippets are not available.

It has 33399 lines of code, 1800 functions and 305 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of zrepl

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

zrepl Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for zrepl.

zrepl Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for zrepl.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Continuous Backup

How to disable azure cosmos db continious backup

Consistency of Continuous backup of Azure Cosmos DB

Mongo atlas recommends cloud provider snaphots for backup - Is it effective?

QUESTION

How to disable azure cosmos db continious backup

Asked 2022-Feb-22 at 10:59

I enabled the Azure cosmos DB continuous backup for one of my Cosmos DBs.
How can I disable it? It just says you have successfully enrolled in continuous backup.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 10:59

I am not sure if you have seen this message in the portal when you created the account/also mentioned in the doc

"You will not be able to switch between the backup policies after the account has been created"

since you need to select either "Periodic" or "Continuous" at the creation of Cosmos Account, it becomes mandatory.

Update:

You will not see the above in portal anymore, you can Switch from "Periodic" to "Continous" on an existing account and that cannot be reverted. You can read more here.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69347197

QUESTION

Consistency of Continuous backup of Azure Cosmos DB

Asked 2021-Nov-25 at 17:15

What would be the consistency of the continuous backup of the write region if the database is using bounded staleness consistency? Will it be equivalent to strong consistent data assuming no failovers happened?

Thanks Guru

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 17:15

Backups made from any secondary region will have data consistency defined by the guarantees provided by the consistency level chosen. In the case of strong consistency, all secondary region backups will have completely consistent data.

Bounded staleness will have data that may have stale or inconsistent data inside the defined staleness window (minimum 300 seconds or 100k writes). Outside of that staleness window the data will be consistent.

Data for the weaker consistency levels will have no guarantees for consistency from backups in secondary regions.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70099953

QUESTION

Mongo atlas recommends cloud provider snaphots for backup - Is it effective?

Asked 2020-May-19 at 10:12

MongoDB has deprecated the continuous back up of data. It has recommended using CPS (Cloud provider snapshots). As far as I understood, snapshots isn't really going to be effective compared to continuous backup coz, if system breaks, then we can only be able to restore the data till the previous snapshot which isn't gonna make the database up-to-date or close to it atleast.

Am I missing something here in my understanding?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-19 at 10:12

Cloud provider snapshots can be combined with point in time restore to give the recovery point objective you require. With oplog based restores you can get granularity of one second.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61886736

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install zrepl

The Makefile is catering to the needs of developers & CI, not distro packagers. It provides phony targets for. Build tooling & dependencies are documented as code in lazy.sh. Go dependencies are then fetched by the go command and pip dependencies are pinned through a requirements.txt.
local development (building, running tests, etc)
building a release in Docker (used by the CI & release management)
building .deb and .rpm packages out of the release artifacts.
ci runs for every commit / branch / tag pushed to GitHub. It is supposed to run very fast (<5min and provides quick feedback to developers). It runs formatting checks, lints and tests on the most important OSes / architectures. Artifacts are published to minio.cschwarz.com (see GitHub Commit Status).
release runs on manual triggers through the CircleCI API (in order to produce a release) periodically on master Artifacts are published to minio.cschwarz.com (see GitHub Commit Status).
Issue the source release: Git tag the release on the master branch. Push the tag. Run ./docs/publish.sh to re-build & push zrepl.github.io.
Issue the official binary release: Run the release pipeline (triggered via CircleCI API) Download the artifacts to the release manager's machine. Create a GitHub release, edit the changelog, upload all the release artifacts, including .rpm and .deb files. Issue the GitHub release. Add the .rpm and .deb files to the official zrepl repos, publish those.