manifest | reading phar.io manifest information | Continuous Backup library
kandi X-RAY | manifest Summary
kandi X-RAY | manifest Summary
Component for reading phar.io manifest information from a PHP Archive (PHAR).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Add contains element
- Maps the requirements in the manifest .
- Create manifest document from string .
- Get attribute value .
- Import nodes .
- Ensure the format of name .
- Get php element .
- Returns a collection of component elements .
- Get extension element .
- Get license element .
manifest Key Features
manifest Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 11License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copyprivate static void createManifestFile() {
BufferedWriter writer;
try {
writer = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(MANIFEST_MF_PATH));
writer.write(MAIN_MANIFEST_ATTRIBUTE);
writer.newLine();
public void addToManifest(String key, String value) {
manifest.getMainAttributes()
.put(new Attributes.Name(key), value);
} public void startManifest() {
manifest.getMainAttributes()
.put(Attributes.Name.MANIFEST_VERSION, "1.0");
} Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on manifest
QUESTION
When I am running to make the Apk in GitHub I got the error. As I am building the Apk in GitHub. There is no way to define something inside manifest as it is building every time fresh. All I can do is inside the Config.Xml file. After Adding android:exported="false" to it, also getting same error. Both images for this question reference attached here. GitHub Error and Config.Xml. Help will be appreciated.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-18 at 19:22You can try like this in config.xml under android platform -
QUESTION
I tried upgrading Android Gradle Plugin from 4.2.2 to 7.0.1 using the upgrade assistant which is available in Android Studio at Tools > AGP Upgrade Assistant. The only change it made was to my project-level build.gradle file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-24 at 16:35the Android Gradle Plugin documentation still says classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:4.2.0' instead of 7.0.1.
You need to read further down the page, to this and this. That table is only relevant for pre-7.0.0 versions.
Is this a bug in Android Gradle Plugin 7.0.1?
Quite possibly. Or, perhaps beyond, as the Instantiatable Lint check has a history of problems.
If your scenario does not match one of those three August 2021 bugs, and you are in position to provide a reproducible test case, file a fresh issue! Beyond that, if a clean-and-rebuild is not clearing up your problem, you might need to simply disable the Instantiatable Lint check for the time being by adding the following to all of your build.gradle files at the application or library level (i.e. all except your project-level build.gradle):
QUESTION
I have added android:exported="true" to my only activity in manifest but still getting below error after updating compile sdk and target sdk version to 31.I also tried rebuilding the project , invalidating cache and restart but that didn't helped
Error- Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for android:exported when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 10:38After the build has failed go to AndroidManifest.xml and in the bottom click merged manifest see which activities which have intent-filter but don't have exported=true attribute. Or you can just get the activities which are giving error.
Add these activities to your App manifest with android:exported="true" and app tools:node="merge" this will add exported attribute to the activities giving error.
Example:
QUESTION
Today i have got this email:
Last July, we announced Advertising policy changes to help bolster security and privacy. We added new restrictions on identifiers used by apps that target children. When users choose to delete their advertising ID in order to opt out of personalization advertising, developers will receive a string of zeros instead of the identifier if they attempt to access the identifier. This behavior will extend to phones, tablets, and Android TV starting April 1, 2022. We also announced that you need to declare an AD_ID permission when you update your app targeting API level to 31 (Android 12). Today, we are sharing that we will give developers more time to ease the transition. We will require this permission declaration when your apps are able to target Android 13 instead of starting with Android 12.
Action Items If you use an advertising ID, you must declare the AD_ID Permission when your app targets Android 13 or above. Apps that don’t declare the permission will get a string of zeros. Note: You’ll be able to target Android 13 later this year. If your app uses an SDK that has declared the Ad ID permission, it will acquire the permission declaration through manifest merge. If your app’s target audience includes children, you must not transmit Android Advertising ID (AAID) from children or users of unknown age.
My app is not using the Advertising ID. Should i declare the AD_ID Permission in Manifest or not?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-14 at 20:51Google describe here how to solve
https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/6048248?hl=en
Add in manifest
QUESTION
I've created a new React app by running npx create-react-app@latest --typescript . and I've run the project using npm start and it all works as expected. I ran npm install semantic-ui-react semantic-ui-css and that installs correctly.
But when I add import 'semantic-ui-css/semantic.min.css'; to index.tsx as instructed, I get a failed to compile error.
Here's my index.tsx file:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-15 at 21:37Judging from this issue:
CSS import breaks webpack 5 compilation
I believe this is an issue with Semantic-UI-React and Webpack 5 (which is used by Create-React-App).
The final answer in that issue is a suggestion to switch to Fomantic-UI 😅
This should be reported into the upstream repo: https://github.com/Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI. The problem is that it's dead 🙄 Reasonable solution is to switch to https://github.com/fomantic/Fomantic-UI.
https://github.com/Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI-React/issues/4287#issuecomment-935897619
QUESTION
I get the error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-30 at 12:24The cause was simple, i had my docker desktop running on linux containers and the image is build from a windows image.
Simply switching to windows containers solved the problem.
The message is clueless, so i hope this save some time to others.
QUESTION
My current android application targets 12 and higher.
I do not want to allow backup of any type and currently have these manifest settings
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 15:28It's usually better to disable backups only for debug builds:
QUESTION
I have been trying out an open-sourced personal AI assistant script. The script works fine but I want to create an executable so that I can gift the executable to one of my friends. However, when I try to create the executable using the auto-py-to-exe, it states the below error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-05 at 02:2042681 INFO: PyInstaller: 4.6
42690 INFO: Python: 3.10.0
QUESTION
After upgrading to android 12, the application is not compiling. It shows
"Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs"
Error showing in Merged manifest:
Merging Errors: Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for
android:exportedwhen the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file)
I have set all the activity with android:exported="false". But it is still showing this issue.
My manifest file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 09:18I'm not sure what you're using to code, but in order to set it in Android Studio, open the manifest of your project and under the "activity" section, put android:exported="true"(or false if that is what you prefer). I have attached an example.
QUESTION
According to doc.rust-lang.org
build[s] a package's documentation, using specified custom flags
build[s] a package's documentation
What is the difference between the two? From what I understand cargo rustdoc is just like cargo doc, but it allows for more lints—for instance:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 21:00Their relationship is like between cargo build and cargo rustc: cargo doc performs all the usual work, for an entire workspace, including dependencies (by default). cargo rustdoc allows you to pass flags directly to rustdoc, and only works for a single crate.
Here is the execution code for cargo rustdoc. Here is the code for cargo doc. The only differences is that cargo rustdoc always specify to not check dependencies while cargo doc allows you to choose (by default it does, but you can specify the flag --no-deps), and that cargo rustc allows you to pass flags directly to rustdoc with the flags after the --.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install manifest
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
