ng-transition | Transition elements via classes | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | ng-transition Summary
kandi X-RAY | ng-transition Summary
Transition elements via classes like you would in the Vue and Alpine.js libraries.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ng-transition
ng-transition Key Features
ng-transition Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ng-transition
QUESTION
I have a input checkbox that has been modified to be buttons one for approve
one for reject
when approved is selected it checks the box etc. Once selected a third button save
submits. If I check the box without using the buttons my script works but then I loose other functionality already associated with the buttons.
The code below is based on Update order status via AJAX in WooCommerce Order received page
How can I listen and detect if the checkbox has been selected even it was checked by selecting the button and not the actual checkbox.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-10 at 15:23You cab check if the checkbox is checked or not using "length", you can do something like below:
QUESTION
I'm practicing Vue transition-group and imitating Vue document example specifically on THIS particular section.
The problem is that my example will apply animation only on end-element instead of element that's being Added/Removed.
Can someone please explain what I'm doing wrong? :( Thank you.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-07 at 21:12Just change the key to num
instead of ind
:
QUESTION
I'm currently trying to find a way to display a custom component (like a Modal) to confirm route changes using the Prompt
component.
The default behavior of the Promp
component is to show a confirm dialog with a message, as you can see in this Example: React Router: Preventing Transitions.
Note: I am using the component.
The router has a prop
named getUserConfirmation
, which you can use to customize the behavior of the component.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-19 at 10:13Inspired by this discussion and by this example, I was able to make my example working.
The problem was that when the was being created, the
setConfirmCallback()
call wasn't done yet. So the component wasn't able to use the
callback
from getUserConfirmation
.
So I've changed this line:
QUESTION
Goal: prevent transitioning to another route if the current route's model has been changed (i.e. user has updated some fields but not saved, i.e. isDirty === true
.
Setup: I'm using pretty much this exact code from EmberJS.com's Routing guide.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-20 at 08:38Below solution works for me fine. willTransition
is not called twice
QUESTION
I'm making a simple todo list to learn Vue.
I am following this approach to add/remove an element from the list: Vue.js guide
When I remove an element from the array I would expect that element to disappear and then the other elements under it to take its space. But in my case the elements are shifted up and then the last element of the list (which has been "copied" one position up) is removed.
Problem: element removed correctly but transition wrong.
Reproducing problem: click remove on one of the items and look at the end of the list.
JSFiddle: link
HTML:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-15 at 20:16The problem is your choice of key
.
Vue uses the key
to determine which VNodes are equivalent from one render to the next. As you're using index
it pairs up the wrong nodes for the array entries and when there's no partner found for the final node it removes that.
So initially you have nodes with keys 0 to 7. You then remove the array item at index 4. But when Vue updates the rendering it doesn't see that 4 has been removed. It just sees nodes with keys 0 to 6. As far as it can tell it is the node with key 7 that has been removed.
For a quick experiment, try using :key="data.text"
. You'll see it now works but the text
isn't a great choice of key
as it isn't necessarily unique. You should probably add some sort of unique id to your array entries so you can use that instead.
QUESTION
I tried persisting Saga Instances using RedisSagaRepository
; I wanted to run Saga in load balancing setup, so I cannot use InMemorySagaRepository
.
However, after I switched, I noticed that some of the events published by Consumers were not getting processed by Saga. I checked the queue and did not see any messages.
What I noticed is it will likely occurs when the Consumer took little to no time to process command and publish event.
This issue will not occur if I use InMemorySagaRepository
or add Task.Delay()
in Consumer.Consume()
Am I using it incorrectly?
Also, If I want to run Saga in load balancing setup, and if the Saga needs to send multiple commands of the same type using dictionary to track completeness (similar logic as in Handling transition to state for multiple events). When multiple Consumer publish events at the same time, would I have race condition if two Sagas are process two different events at the same time? In this case, would the Dictionary in State object will be set correctly?
The code is available here
SagaService.ConfigureSagaEndPoint()
is where I switch between InMemorySagaRepository
and RedisSagaRepository
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-29 at 12:46When you have events published in this manner, and are using multiple service instances with a non-transactional saga repository (such as Redis), you need to design your saga such that a unique identifier is used and enforced by Redis. This prevents multiple instances of the same saga from being created.
You also need to accept the events in more than the "expected" state. For instance, expecting to receive a Start, which puts the saga into a processing state, before receiving another event only in processing, is likely to fail. Allowing the saga to be started (Initially, in Automatonymous) by any of the sequence of events is recommended, to avoid out-of-order message delivery issues. As long as the events all move the dial from the left to the right, the eventual state will be reached. If an earlier event is received after a later event, it shouldn't move the state backwards (or to the left, in this example) but only add information to the saga instance and leave it at the later state.
If two events are processed on separate service instances, they'll both try to insert the saga instance to Redis, which will fail as a duplicate. The message should then retry (add UseMessageRetry() to your receive endpoint), which would then pick up the now existing saga instance and apply the event.
QUESTION
In this example you can see some nice transition between pages triggered by the route change. (took from LevelUp Tutorials' React Animation course, thanks a lot Scott Tolinski).
Now I'd like to make these transitions happen in both directions, depending on which page it's transitioning to (and from), for instance:
- Page One -> Page Two (both pages transition from left to right)
- Page Three -> Page One (both pages transition from right to left)
- etc
From that first example I created this example where the value of x
is dynamic and should be evaluated to either 100
or -100
, based on the direction of the transition.
I haven't fundamentally understood how useTransition()
works, and the documentation is rather limited. The examples look amazing but are quite hard to understand.
This example seems to do a similar thing to what I'm trying to achieve but the code feels like black magic: the y
property of each object returned from rows.map()
appears to be related to the y
value on the functions assigned to enter
and update
properties because if I remove that I get the error: Cannot read property 'replace' of undefined
. How does that work?
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-17 at 20:52This problem has two part.
determining the direction
change the animation
I created an example for solving the second part. When the user click page one I reverse the animation.
QUESTION
The React Router v4 component is perfect for the use case of protecting navigation away from a partially filled out form.
But what if we want to supply our own logic in place of the default browser alert()
that this component uses? React is intended for creating UIs, so it seems like a pretty reasonable use case. Digging through the issues on Prompt in the github I did not find anyone asking about this.
Does anyone know of a solution for providing custom behavior for the alert?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-04 at 10:00Although you can make use of a custom Modal component while preventing navigating between pages through Links, you can't show a custom modal while trying to close browser or reload it.
However if thats fine with you, you can make use of history.listen
to and block navigation. I wrote a generic HOC for it which solves this use case.
In the below code whitelisted pathnames are the pathnames that you would want the other person to navigate to without showing the prompt
QUESTION
I have a list of items, contained within a javascript array. Similar to the examples found on the vue.js documentation.
This is the workflow I'm struggling with:
- A user clicks "Add".
- I immediately add an item to the list (in the spot where they asked it to be)
- I send an ajax request to the server to create the item.
- The call returns with the database row for the new item.
I'm using the database primary key as my vue key - which I have no way of knowing up to the point the ajax call finally gets back to me. But if I simply update the ID on the object, I end up with that row transitioning out and then back in.
Is there a way to tell vue that I'm changing the ID of an item?
My ideal case would be something along the lines of:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-22 at 04:30By behavior key
is supposed to determine the uniqueness of the item in a list. So change in the key
attribute is and will always represent a different component.
Having this limitation in mind, you have two options. First is the simplest one with a compromise - just disable the animations/transitions.
The second option is to create a localized map of unique id for each existing and new item. For example,
QUESTION
I would like to prevent a react-router transition away from a form if it is invalid. Using a prompt to do this is unsatisfactory, as I want to totally block the user from navigating to a new route until the form is valid (whereas the prompt seems to always provide the user the option to proceed), and would like to display an error message on my page instead of an intrusive prompt.
How might I prevent this transition without a prompt?
My form:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-19 at 23:11Why not just render a disabled version of the button if the form is invalid? For example:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ng-transition
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page