codequality | Codequality jobs in pipelines https | MLOps library
kandi X-RAY | codequality Summary
kandi X-RAY | codequality Summary
Codequality jobs in pipelines
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of codequality
codequality Key Features
codequality Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on codequality
QUESTION
I have the following GitLab CI yml file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 16:00I don't know which shell is configured in your runner but it seems commands in your example are executed in bash
or sh
context.
In the image you use Powershell core pwsh
is available to execute Powershell command.
This script part works :
QUESTION
I need my pipeline to produce a SNAPSHOT or release artifact, and then also produce a Docker image tagged with latest, or with the version number of the release. I am using the fabric8 plugin and taking advantage of the feature that will produce a tag based on the version field of the POM file.
Due to the order of the stages the tag will always be latest, regardless of whether its a snapshot or a release. I need some help to determine the proper way to do this as I cant see a way to put them in a different order.
The tools involved are Maven + fabric8, Jenkins, Artifactory, and SVN.
After the Maven release and prepare steps the POM will have a SNAPSHOT version, so the stage "Create Docker Image" will always produce a tag of 'latest'.
I could do something like figure out what the SVN tag url is for the released version and check it out and then do my build. That feels wrong though, but maybe not. There has to be a more "official" way of doing this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-11 at 12:05The solution is to use the POM file from target/checkout. See the stage labeled "Create Docker Image For Release".
QUESTION
I have a DLL addressing the .NET 4.7.1 library.
Probably irrelevant, but it's written in C# and consumes NuGet packages using the "packages.config" pattern, rather than the newer PackageReference configuration.
I publish this as a NuGet package (have been doing this for several years). But now when I execute the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-16 at 23:09As per NU5128 doc, This warning was added during NuGet 5.3's development, and first was available in .NET Core SDK 3.0 Preview 9. NuGet/Home#8583 tracks an issue where the warning was being raised in too many scenarios. You can use the NoWarn MSBuild property (add $(NoWarn);NU5128 to any PropertyGroup in your project file). If you have multiple projects affected, you can use Directory.Build.targets to automatically add NoWarn to all projects
QUESTION
I'm trying to build an ASP.NET-Core 3.1
(netcoreapp3.1
) application which has a dependency on a NuGet library that is .NET-Standard 2.0
which uses MSBuild SDK "Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor"
.
This builds and runs fine from Visual Studio (2019) but when I run dotnet build
I get the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-13 at 20:45visual studio uses MSBuild to build your solution file, so you can try MSBuild %yoursolutionfile%
to build your solution, on the other hand, dotnet build
typically builds a single project instead of solution.
to answer your second question, if you do find that your dependency is required and can not be ignored in dotnet build for 3.1 version, yes a multitarget complie should work, you can follow this link to build a multitarget application https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/tutorials/libraries#how-to-multitarget
QUESTION
I followed the official guid deploied a pipline to analyse my code quality. Although the pipline passed and the job successed, the json file didn't generated by docker. And these notis displaied:
WARNING: A new version (v0.83.0) is available. Upgrade instructions are available at: https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate#packages Uploading artifacts... WARNING: gl-code-quality-report.json: no matching files ERROR: No files to upload
Job succeeded
And this is my /etc/gitlab-runner/config.toml file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-21 at 18:13ANyways, months later, if you are using Gitlab CE ths won't work, is a feature for EE only.
QUESTION
I am a bit confused about the various code analyzers for .NET Core.
If you create a default .NET Core web project, you get the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers
.
In addition, on NuGet, there is Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
(note the slight difference in the name). After installing it, I see that it contains a lot more rules.
And finally, there is also Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers
, which appears to contain Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
.
So what exactly is the relationship between Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers
, Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
and Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers
? What should my project have?
P.S. After creating a new project, I search NuGet for Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers
package (which already exists in my project). It finds it and states my project has v1.1 and that it needs to upgrade it to v2.9.4. However, according to NuGet, v1.1 was released in 2015. This makes no sense as I am using VS2019 and there have been plenty of releases of this analyzer between 2015 and 2019.
However, when I upgrade the package to 2.9.4 - the analyzer has the same 3 rules that v1.1 had. So what exactly am I upgrading?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-30 at 18:18This is described here: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/master/README.md
In summary:
- Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers is the package to use for running analyzers.
This package contains common code quality improvement rules that are not specific to usage of any particular API
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers is for code analysis creators. So for creating an analyzer.
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers: This is the primary analyzer package for this repo that contains all the ported FxCop code analysis rules (CAxxxx).
QUESTION
My ci configuration isn't working with code quality stage:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-03 at 05:57code_quality
stage is missing a stage
parameter. Include that as below:
QUESTION
I'm unable to get CA1062 (validate arguments of public methods) to evaluate.
I've created a .Net Standard 2.0 C# class library and installed Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
and several others nuget packages as per this screenshot:
I've also enabled CA1062 in the ruleset for the project, as per the image:
I've created this class to test if CA1062 (validate arguments of public methods) does evaluate:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-19 at 16:28I've recently removed all Analyzers and installed a higher version of the FxCop package on this project, and it solved the issue.
(I've added this in case any developer discovers this post and is still searching for a solution)
QUESTION
On this project: https://gitlab.com/tyvain/parcoursup/tree/master
I have a code quality stage:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-05 at 03:592 problems here:
QUESTION
I'm testing Gitlab AutoDevOps with my project. My problem is that AutoDevOps do a quality check, it passes, but I don't know where to find the result, is says it upload an artifact, but doesn't say where.
Here are the logs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-26 at 13:41Indeed the answer was quite easy, gitlab uploaded it to the gitlab registry.
You can go to your-project > Registry, and then you will see a group/subgroup/project/autodevops element. Copy the link, and then you will be able to run the container
First you have to login:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install codequality
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page