codequality | Codequality jobs in pipelines https | MLOps library

 by   gitlab-org/ci-cd HTML Version: Current License: MIT License

kandi X-RAY | codequality Summary

kandi X-RAY | codequality Summary

codequality is a HTML library typically used in Data Preparation, MLOps applications. codequality has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitLab.

Codequality jobs in pipelines

            kandi-support Support

              codequality has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 24 star(s) with 19 fork(s). There are no watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 12 open issues and 0 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 50 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of codequality is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              codequality has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              codequality has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              codequality is licensed under the MIT License License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              codequality releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of codequality
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            codequality Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for codequality.

            codequality Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for codequality.

            Community Discussions


            GitLab - Write-Host: command not found
            Asked 2021-Feb-26 at 16:00

            I have the following GitLab CI yml file:



            Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 16:00

            I don't know which shell is configured in your runner but it seems commands in your example are executed in bash or sh context.

            In the image you use Powershell core pwsh is available to execute Powershell command.

            This script part works :



            Jenkins pipeline to create Maven artifacts and a Docker image
            Asked 2020-Aug-11 at 12:05

            I need my pipeline to produce a SNAPSHOT or release artifact, and then also produce a Docker image tagged with latest, or with the version number of the release. I am using the fabric8 plugin and taking advantage of the feature that will produce a tag based on the version field of the POM file.

            Due to the order of the stages the tag will always be latest, regardless of whether its a snapshot or a release. I need some help to determine the proper way to do this as I cant see a way to put them in a different order.

            The tools involved are Maven + fabric8, Jenkins, Artifactory, and SVN.

            After the Maven release and prepare steps the POM will have a SNAPSHOT version, so the stage "Create Docker Image" will always produce a tag of 'latest'.

            I could do something like figure out what the SVN tag url is for the released version and check it out and then do my build. That feels wrong though, but maybe not. There has to be a more "official" way of doing this.



            Answered 2020-Aug-11 at 12:05

            The solution is to use the POM file from target/checkout. See the stage labeled "Create Docker Image For Release".



            Creating NuGet package: NU5128 exception - not clear on how to fix
            Asked 2020-Feb-16 at 23:09

            I have a DLL addressing the .NET 4.7.1 library.

            Probably irrelevant, but it's written in C# and consumes NuGet packages using the "packages.config" pattern, rather than the newer PackageReference configuration.

            I publish this as a NuGet package (have been doing this for several years). But now when I execute the following:



            Answered 2020-Feb-16 at 23:09

            As per NU5128 doc, This warning was added during NuGet 5.3's development, and first was available in .NET Core SDK 3.0 Preview 9. NuGet/Home#8583 tracks an issue where the warning was being raised in too many scenarios. You can use the NoWarn MSBuild property (add $(NoWarn);NU5128 to any PropertyGroup in your project file). If you have multiple projects affected, you can use Directory.Build.targets to automatically add NoWarn to all projects

            Add Nowarn to the project



            Building ASP.NET-Core 3.1 with .NET-Standard 2.0 projects leads to conflicting Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Analyzers assemblies
            Asked 2020-Feb-13 at 20:52

            I'm trying to build an ASP.NET-Core 3.1 (netcoreapp3.1) application which has a dependency on a NuGet library that is .NET-Standard 2.0 which uses MSBuild SDK "Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor".

            This builds and runs fine from Visual Studio (2019) but when I run dotnet build I get the following error:



            Answered 2020-Feb-13 at 20:45

            visual studio uses MSBuild to build your solution file, so you can try MSBuild %yoursolutionfile% to build your solution, on the other hand, dotnet build typically builds a single project instead of solution.

            to answer your second question, if you do find that your dependency is required and can not be ignored in dotnet build for 3.1 version, yes a multitarget complie should work, you can follow this link to build a multitarget application



            Gitlab CI run code quality not generate .json file
            Asked 2019-Nov-21 at 18:13

            I followed the official guid deploied a pipline to analyse my code quality. Although the pipline passed and the job successed, the json file didn't generated by docker. And these notis displaied:

            WARNING: A new version (v0.83.0) is available. Upgrade instructions are available at: Uploading artifacts... WARNING: gl-code-quality-report.json: no matching files ERROR: No files to upload
            Job succeeded

            And this is my /etc/gitlab-runner/config.toml file:



            Answered 2019-Nov-21 at 18:13

            ANyways, months later, if you are using Gitlab CE ths won't work, is a feature for EE only.



            What is the difference between various Microsoft.CodeQuality.* analyzers?
            Asked 2019-Sep-30 at 18:18

            I am a bit confused about the various code analyzers for .NET Core.

            If you create a default .NET Core web project, you get the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers.

            In addition, on NuGet, there is Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers (note the slight difference in the name). After installing it, I see that it contains a lot more rules.

            And finally, there is also Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers, which appears to contain Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers.

            So what exactly is the relationship between Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers, Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers and Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers? What should my project have?

            P.S. After creating a new project, I search NuGet for Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers package (which already exists in my project). It finds it and states my project has v1.1 and that it needs to upgrade it to v2.9.4. However, according to NuGet, v1.1 was released in 2015. This makes no sense as I am using VS2019 and there have been plenty of releases of this analyzer between 2015 and 2019.

            However, when I upgrade the package to 2.9.4 - the analyzer has the same 3 rules that v1.1 had. So what exactly am I upgrading?



            Answered 2019-Sep-30 at 18:18

            This is described here:

            In summary:

            • Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers is the package to use for running analyzers.

              This package contains common code quality improvement rules that are not specific to usage of any particular API

            • Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers is for code analysis creators. So for creating an analyzer.
            • Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers: This is the primary analyzer package for this repo that contains all the ported FxCop code analysis rules (CAxxxx).



            Gitlab ci with code quality: This GitLab CI configuration is invalid
            Asked 2019-Aug-22 at 15:39

            My ci configuration isn't working with code quality stage:



            Answered 2018-Sep-03 at 05:57

            code_quality stage is missing a stage parameter. Include that as below:



            CA1062 not evaluating on .Net Standard 2.0 class library
            Asked 2019-Aug-19 at 16:28

            I'm unable to get CA1062 (validate arguments of public methods) to evaluate.

            I've created a .Net Standard 2.0 C# class library and installed Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers and several others nuget packages as per this screenshot:

            I've also enabled CA1062 in the ruleset for the project, as per the image:

            I've created this class to test if CA1062 (validate arguments of public methods) does evaluate:



            Answered 2019-Aug-19 at 16:28

            I've recently removed all Analyzers and installed a higher version of the FxCop package on this project, and it solved the issue.

            (I've added this in case any developer discovers this post and is still searching for a solution)



            Gitlab code quality: where is the report?
            Asked 2019-Mar-27 at 13:56

            On this project:

            I have a code quality stage:



            Answered 2018-Sep-05 at 03:59

            2 problems here:

            • the report is only available for merge request in 'gitlab EE edition' (not free)
            • the report can be downloaded as a json file here:



            How to get quality results from gitlab autodevops
            Asked 2019-Feb-26 at 13:41

            I'm testing Gitlab AutoDevOps with my project. My problem is that AutoDevOps do a quality check, it passes, but I don't know where to find the result, is says it upload an artifact, but doesn't say where.

            Here are the logs:



            Answered 2019-Feb-26 at 13:41

            Indeed the answer was quite easy, gitlab uploaded it to the gitlab registry.

            You can go to your-project > Registry, and then you will see a group/subgroup/project/autodevops element. Copy the link, and then you will be able to run the container

            First you have to login:


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install codequality

            You can download it from GitLab.


            If you want to help and extend the list of supported scanners, read the contribution guidelines.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link