scala-best-practices | best practices for the Scala programming language | Functional Programming library

 by   nrinaudo HTML Version: Current License: CC-BY-4.0

kandi X-RAY | scala-best-practices Summary

kandi X-RAY | scala-best-practices Summary

scala-best-practices is a HTML library typically used in Programming Style, Functional Programming applications. scala-best-practices has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Collection of best practices for the Scala programming language
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              scala-best-practices has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 195 star(s) with 19 fork(s). There are 15 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 6 open issues and 15 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 3 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of scala-best-practices is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              scala-best-practices has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              scala-best-practices has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              scala-best-practices code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              scala-best-practices is licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              scala-best-practices releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 456 lines of code, 3 functions and 13 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of scala-best-practices
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            scala-best-practices Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for scala-best-practices.

            scala-best-practices Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for scala-best-practices.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Are there algebraic data types outside of sum and product?
            Asked 2019-Dec-29 at 09:21

            By most definitons the common or basic algebraic data types in Haskell or Scala are sum and product. Examples: 1, 2.

            Sometimes a definition just says algebraic data types are sum and product, perhaps for simplicity.

            However, the definitions leave an impression that other algebraic data types are possible, and sum and product are just the most useful to describe selection or combination of elements.

            Given there are subtraction, division, raising to an integer power operations in a basic algebra - is it correct some implementation of other alternative algebraic types in programming is possible, but they are not useful?

            Do any programming languages have algebraic data types implemented that are not sum and product types?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Dec-28 at 15:47

            "Algebraic" comes from category theory. Every algebraic data type is an initial algebra of a functor. So you could in principle call anything that comes from a functor in this way algebraic, and I think it's quite a large class.

            Interpreting "algebraic" to mean "high-school algebra" (I don't mean to be condescending, that's just how we refer to it) as you have, there are some nice analogies.

            • Arbitrary powers, not just integer powers, are closely analogous to function types, that is, A -> B is analogous to BA. In category theory, when you consider a function ("morphism") as an object of a category, it's called an exponential object, and the latter notation is used. For fun, see if you can prove the law CA+B = CA × CB by writing a bijection between the corresponding types.
            • Division is analogous to quotient types, which is a fascinating area of research that reaches into things as hott and trendy as homotopy type theory. The analogy of quotients to division is not as strong as product types with multiplication, as you have to divide by an equivalence relation.
            • At this rate, you would expect subtraction to have some beautiful analogy to go with it, but alas I know of none. Dan Piponi has explored it a little through the antidiagonal, but it is far from a general analogy.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59509294

            QUESTION

            Is returning Either/Option/Try/Or considered a viable / idiomatic approach when function has preconditions for arguments?
            Asked 2019-Jun-28 at 17:38

            First of all, I'm very new to Scala and don't have any experience writing production code with it, so I lack understanding of what is considered a good/best practice among community. I stumbled upon these resources:

            1. https://github.com/alexandru/scala-best-practices
            2. https://nrinaudo.github.io/scala-best-practices/

            It is mentioned there that throwing exceptions is not very good practice, which made me think what would be a good way to define preconditions for function then, because

            A function that throws is a bit of a lie: its type implies it’s total function when it’s not.

            After a bit of research, it seems that using Option/Either/Try/Or(scalactic) is a better approach, since you can use something like T Or IllegalArgumentException as return type to clearly indicate that function is actually partial, using exception as a way to store message that can be wrapped in other exceptions.

            However lacking Scala experience I don't quite understand if this is actually viable approach for a real project or using Predef.require is a way to go. I would appreciate if someone explained how things are usually done in Scala community and why.

            I've also seen Functional assertion in Scala, but while the idea itself looks interesting, I think PartialFunction is not very suitable for the purpose as it is, because often more than one argument is passed and tuples look like a hack in this case.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Jun-27 at 08:07

            Option or Either is definitely the way to go for functional programming.

            With Option it is important to document why None might be returned.

            With Either, the left side is the unsuccessful value (the "error"), while the right side is the successful value. The left side does not necessarily have to be an Exception (or a subtype of it), it can be a simple error message String (type aliases are your friend here) or a custom data type that is suitable for you application.

            As an example, I usually use the following pattern when error handling with Either:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56785948

            QUESTION

            Why I should use context.become() to store internal state in Actor?
            Asked 2017-Dec-07 at 18:07

            I've read scala-best-practices and have a question about "5.2. SHOULD mutate state in actors only with context.become". I don't understand why it is so bad to store internal state using var. If actor executes all messages sequentially I just can't see any source of problems. What do I miss?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Dec-02 at 12:50

            Consider the first example in the article that you referenced:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47589383

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install scala-best-practices

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/nrinaudo/scala-best-practices.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone nrinaudo/scala-best-practices

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:nrinaudo/scala-best-practices.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Consider Popular Functional Programming Libraries

            ramda

            by ramda

            mostly-adequate-guide

            by MostlyAdequate

            scala

            by scala

            guides

            by thoughtbot

            fantasy-land

            by fantasyland

            Try Top Libraries by nrinaudo

            kantan.csv

            by nrinaudoScala

            kantan.xpath

            by nrinaudoScala

            kantan.regex

            by nrinaudoScala

            kantan.dtables

            by nrinaudoScala