meshcat | Remotely-controllable 3D viewer , built on top of three.js | Frontend Framework library

 by   rdeits HTML Version: v0.1.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | meshcat Summary

kandi X-RAY | meshcat Summary

meshcat is a HTML library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, Three.js applications. meshcat has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Remotely-controllable 3D viewer, built on top of three.js
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              meshcat has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 125 star(s) with 21 fork(s). There are 11 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 10 open issues and 29 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 87 days. There are 3 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of meshcat is v0.1.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              meshcat has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              meshcat has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              meshcat is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              meshcat releases are available to install and integrate.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of meshcat
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            meshcat Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for meshcat.

            meshcat Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for meshcat.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            The issue with modelling the force/torque sensor in Drake
            Asked 2021-Apr-06 at 14:44

            I came across the following error message when connecting get_reaction_forces_output_port() to my controller.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 14:44

            What you have is an algebraic loop. A good place where to read about this could be here though the concept is a general idea that you could find in other references on dynamical systems (google search algebraic loop for more). Another read here. Finally, and probably first, I recommend reading the link provided by the error message itself in Drake, this one.

            In Drake, having an algebraic loop usually (always?) means a bad modeling decision. It'd only mean one of two things:

            1. One of the systems has a feedthrough when it shouldn't. For instance, controllers usually work on state, and therefore they are not feedthrough.
            2. The feedthrough is unavoidable because you really mean what you wrote. What that means in Drake is that you should not have two systems, but one that incorporates the entire algebraic model.

            In practice things can get tricky though. In your case, it'd seem you want to use reaction forces to take an action in your controller. Now, your plant model is discrete. Recall this means that we do not have an ODE but an algebraic equation (though complex) describing the next state given the current state. When you add feedback using an algebraic model of actuation u as a function of reaction forces, what you did is to come up with a larger system of algebraic equations.

            Now, think about your problem in a real robot. What you probably would do, is to measure reaction forces at time t1, to apply a control action at t2 != t1 (since reading from a sensor and computing your control action do take time). Therefore, there is an unavoidable lag in your control action. This could be modeled with a ZOH (zero order hold) which in Drake is systems::ZeroOrderHold. If you place that block right before or after your controller, you'll break the feedthrough (hopefully clear why after reading the references above?).

            Another "trick", though motivated from real experience, would be having a low pass filter to remove quickly changing forces. Adding a low pass filter between plant and the controller to filter the reaction forces will also break the loop. In Drake you can add one with systems::FirstOrderLowPassFilter.

            Again, these are not only tricks, but really the proper thing to do if you think about it.

            Hopefully this helps.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66965256

            QUESTION

            Extra body with nans in Context of a MultiBodyPlant causing Error While Simulation
            Asked 2020-Dec-01 at 23:15

            After importing an urdf file and creating a MultiBodyPlant I see an extra parameter group with nans when I print the context. The full printed context can be seen here. The parameter group which I cannot explain/understand is this one:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Dec-01 at 23:15

            The NaNs that you're seeing in the parameter group correspond to the world body, and although they look suspicious I don't think they are the root of your problem. The world body doesn't have a valid set of inertial parameters (thus they're set to NaN), and is handled as a special case in the code. As it is written in the current implementation, the body parameter API is ubiquitous for every body. Each body has a set of parameters in the context, regardless of whether they are valid. This might be a point of contention for special bodies ('world'), so I've opened up an issue to discuss.

            The problem you're having now is because your base_main link (and thus your entire robot) is a free floating body. You're not allowed to have a free floating tree of zero mass links attached with a joint to another free floating tree of links with non-zero mass because any torque applied at the joint connecting them (Joint_base_yaw in your case) would cause an infinite acceleration on the inboard bodies. To solve this:

            • (Option 1): Add a fixed joint between base_main and world in your URDF file.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65093710

            QUESTION

            Recording multiple meshcat visualizers
            Asked 2020-Nov-11 at 02:41

            I would like to record multiple meshcat visualizers with different prefix ids so I can eventually save them to an HTML file that I can interact with later. I would like the different visualizations to play on top of each other and to be able to select/unselect different visualizations.

            Here is a minimal replication of the problem. I expect there to be two cartpole visualizations that are on top of each other. However, I only end up seeing one of them being recorded. The other cartpole seems stuck at the end position when I play back the recording

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Nov-11 at 02:41

            Here is one solution. I don't love it, but it accomplishes the stated goal. Note the changes:

            1. saving and publishing only one animation
            2. naming the model in the MultibodyPlant with a distinct name for each sim
            3. setting delete_prefix_on_load=False so it doesn't clear the old geometry

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64757012

            QUESTION

            PyDrake: Center of Mass in Free-Floating Simulation is moving wihtout any (External) Forces Applied
            Asked 2020-Oct-27 at 00:36

            As I understand, without any application of external force (such as gravity), the center of mass of a multibody system should be constant if only internal torques (at the joints) are applied.

            In PyDrake, I've set up a free-floating simulation of a box spacecraft with a 6 DoF arm attached. At the start, I set an initial velocity to the first joint using the following command:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-24 at 16:29

            Here is my quick reproduction, in case it helps. I've confirmed that setting a very small target accuracy results in the same numbers, set the initial angular velocity down so it looks more reasonable, confirmed that the gravity is properly being zeroed, etc.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64513713

            QUESTION

            Visualize multiple simulations with Drake Visualizer
            Asked 2020-Aug-13 at 00:45

            Is there a way to run multiple drake simulators at the same time and to see the separate visualizations in different windows?

            I'm trying to run multiple simulations in parallel and I wanted to visually double check that everything looks correct. I believe Meshcat would allow for this because you can set different urls, but I'm not sure how to do it with Drake Visualizer

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-13 at 00:45

            Copying my suggestion from the issue:

            If you set the LCM_DEFAULT_URL environment variable to a different value for each (visualizer process, simulator process) pair, the messages will be transmitted on different socket addresses and not interfere with each other.

            (For the simulator, you can also set the URL in the DrakeLcm constructor, though the environment variable is often easiest when launching several processes.)

            The default value for LCM_DEFAULT_URL is shown here:

            drake/lcm/drake_lcm.cc

            Line 22 in 20d799e constexpr const char* const kLcmDefaultUrl = "udpm://239.255.76.67:7667?ttl=0";

            Using a different port number, for example, would provide for independent process pairs.

            env LCM_DEFAULT_URL=udpm://239.255.76.67:7666?ttl=0 bazel-bin/tools/drake_visualizer &

            or

            export LCM_DEFAULT_URL=udpm://239.255.76.67:7666?ttl=0

            bazel-bin/tools/drake_visualizer &

            bazel-bin/stuff/my_simulator &

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63252779

            QUESTION

            How do you pipe the visualizer output of drake to a port using MeshCat with pydake?
            Asked 2020-May-01 at 23:24

            How do you setup MeshCat on an exposed port as an online interface to interact my drake program? Looking for a short example in pydrake. Presently attempting on Ubuntu 18.04 with pydrake.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-May-01 at 23:24

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install meshcat

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/rdeits/meshcat.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone rdeits/meshcat

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:rdeits/meshcat.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link