regex-cheatsheet | Cheatsheet for different regex syntaxes | Regex library
kandi X-RAY | regex-cheatsheet Summary
kandi X-RAY | regex-cheatsheet Summary
Many programs use regular expression to find & replace text. However, they tend to come with their own different flavor. You can probably expect most modern software and programming languages to be using some variation of the Perl flavor, "PCRE"; however command-line tools (grep, less, …) often use the POSIX flavor (sometimes with an extended variant, e.g. egrep or sed -r). ViM also comes with its own syntax (a superset of what Vi accepts). This cheatsheet lists the respective syntax they each use. If you spot errors or missing data, or just want to make this prettier/more accurate, don’t hesitate to open an [issue][is] or a [pull request][pr]. The rendered cheatsheet is available here: [regex cheatsheet][cc]. Note that this is still a work in progress; a lot of entries need some details in some kind of tooltip. [cc]: [is]: [pr]:
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of regex-cheatsheet
regex-cheatsheet Key Features
regex-cheatsheet Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on regex-cheatsheet
QUESTION
I am playing bandit from overthewire.org; getting to level 10 requires me to find strings preceded with several "=" characters (equal sign) (I interpreted "several" as "two or more") in a text file.
The target lines look like this:
========== passwordhere123
i.e. ten equal signs, one space, and a string of letters and numbers, followed by line break (not sure which exact type).
These lines should be excluded:
c========== EqualSignDidNotStartLine
= only-one-equal-sign
equalsign=somewhereElse
No equal signs at all
The original data did not contain any lines preceded by less than ten but more than one ='s; there are some +'s (plus signs) littered in the text, but +'s and ='s are never in the same line.
The bandit server runs some kind of linux @ 4.18.12 (uname -r), GNU bash 4.4 (from man page), and GNU grep 2.27 (from man page).
The raw data contains non-readable parts, so it is fed through strings
first to leave only human-readable strings fro grep to process.
From what I learned, grep's default regex engine (BRE, thanks Casimir) should not be too different from PCRE's. *
is still a quantifier (match the preceding pattern zero times or more), not as a standalone pattern meaning "anything, zero times or more". This confuses me in grep's behavior below.
Edit: per this chart, "+" needs to be escaped (i.e.\+
) in BRE. It does not help though. I will make some more testing strings to try to decipher what's going on.
Here's the command I tried:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-27 at 19:48First, I'd be worried about shell expansion. From long experience, I put regexs on the command line in 'single quotes', to avoid meta-character madness.
Second, this (under BRE):
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install regex-cheatsheet
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page