reconftw | tool designed to perform automated recon | Security Testing library

by six2dez HTML Version: v2.6 License: GPL-3.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | reconftw Summary

reconftw is a HTML library typically used in Testing, Security Testing applications. reconftw has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

ReconFTW automates the entire process of reconnaisance for you. It outperforms the work of subdomain enumeration along with various vulnerability checks and obtaining maximum information about your target. ReconFTW uses lot of techniques (passive, bruteforce, permutations, certificate transparency, source code scraping, analytics, DNS records...) for subdomain enumeration which helps you getting the maximum and the most interesting subdomains so that you be ahead of the competition. It also performs various vulnerability checks like XSS, Open Redirects, SSRF, CRLF, LFI, SQLi, SSL tests, SSTI, DNS zone transfers, and much more. Along with these, it performs OSINT techniques, directory fuzzing, dorking, ports scanning, screenshots, nuclei scan on your target.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

reconftw has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 4334 star(s) with 748 fork(s). There are 100 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 24 open issues and 351 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 20 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of reconftw is v2.6

Quality

reconftw has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

reconftw has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

reconftw code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

reconftw is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

reconftw releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of reconftw

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

reconftw Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for reconftw.

reconftw Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for reconftw.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Security Testing

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

QUESTION

DAST security scaning of a IoT Nodemcu esp8266 LUA script www HTML server connected to camera and A/C relay

Asked 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)

Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)

I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?

The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?

Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?

I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.

I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.

So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.

Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04

I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.

If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).

Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.

You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66995125

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network