web-performance | W3C Web Performance Working Group | Frontend Framework library

by w3c HTML Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | web-performance Summary

web-performance is a HTML library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, React, Webpack, Nginx, WebGL applications. web-performance has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However web-performance has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

W3C Web Performance Working Group repo

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

web-performance has a low active ecosystem.

It has 379 star(s) with 76 fork(s). There are 96 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 15 open issues and 13 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 296 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of web-performance is current.

Quality

web-performance has no bugs reported.

Security

web-performance has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

web-performance has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

web-performance releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of web-performance

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

web-performance Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for web-performance.

web-performance Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for web-performance.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on web-performance

How to code split with Expo web (React Native Web)?

Does Google QUIC have substantially better performance than TCP?

QUESTION

How to code split with Expo web (React Native Web)?

Asked 2020-May-11 at 10:42

Is there a recommended approach for code splitting in Expo web projects?

I cant find anything in the docs, even on the web performance page: https://docs.expo.io/guides/web-performance/

Im surprised as this something a lot (possibly most) web apps are going to want to do. If it's not officially supported is there a workaround?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-06 at 16:59

With @expo/webpack-config, mentioned in Presets section, it should.

According to this fragment in optimization addon it should supports SplitChunk, and according to outputs configuration it should supports Dynamic imports in production mode.

For example: building basic expo example project "with some tabs" will produce in web-build/static/js, something like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61518984

QUESTION

Does Google QUIC have substantially better performance than TCP?

Asked 2018-Mar-09 at 18:13

Google QUIC is a new transport protocol. It uses UDP and provides a very nice set of features:

It doesn't need an initial handshake (0-round-trip)
It has security features by design (combination of TLS and TCP)
It brings the concept of streams, which is great for avoiding the head of the line problem and perfect for HTTP2 (https://community.akamai.com/community/web-performance/blog/2017/08/10/how-does-http2-solve-the-head-of-line-blocking-hol-issue)
The congestion control algorithm is in user space and can be replaced easily

In their SIGCOMM17 publication, they've discussed some performance benefits of QUIC, but my question is:

Do we have a real need to abandon traditional TCP-based technologies and move to QUIC? What is a killer application for QUIC? Is there anyone else apart from Google guys who uses QUIC or at least feel he or she should do that?

My feeling is that we had opportunities to achieve most of those promised benefits by using existing systems like TCP fast open or Multipath TCP.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Mar-09 at 18:13

QUIC is a good alternative for HTTP transport when fetching small objects and TCP's handshake overhead doesn't really pay. Additionally, it may have an advantage when TCP stumbles because of high packet loss.

TCP still pays off when transferring substantial amounts of data as it handles packet loss, congestion, ... by itself (which QUIC also does but in a less well-known/accepted way).

Time will tell if this approach catches.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49195375

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install web-performance

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: