Perceptron | Using Java Swing to implement single layer perceptron | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | Perceptron Summary
kandi X-RAY | Perceptron Summary
Using Java Swing to implement single-layer perceptron neural network. Learning algorithm can refer to this Wikipedia page. Input consists of several groups of multi-dimensional data set, The data were cut into three parts (each number roughly equal to the same group), 2/3 of the data given to training function, and the remaining 1/3 of the data given to testing function. The purpose of program is training to cut a number of groups of hyperplanes and synaptic weights, and display the results in the graphical interface.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Load a file
- Trains the interceptron of the model
- Test the accuracy of the problem
- Reset the data
- Resets the UI frame
- Returns a random number
- Trains the concept
- The main menu
- Changes the look and feel
- Creates the UI components
- Set the background color of the text field
Perceptron Key Features
Perceptron Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Perceptron
QUESTION
I am new in machine learning, I am now working on a project using deep learning. the project works with texts, more specifically it is a URL binary classification. I use python as a language and pycharm as an IDE, I am now advised to apply multi layer perceptron MLP algorithm but, I am not sure if this is the right algorithm for my work to apply or not. any advice is appreciated. best regards..
I am looking for an advice before starting..
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 15:32MLP can indeed be used for your url binary classification, before that you need to turn your text data into something that a neural network can recognize. You can also use CNN, etc. for text classification, you can refer to:
QUESTION
I have a Perceptron written in Javascript that works fine, code below. My question is about the threshold in the activation function. Other code I have seen has something like if (sum > 0) {return 1} else {return 0}.
My perceptron only works with if (sum > 1) {return 1} else {return 0}.
Why is that? Full code below.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-07 at 00:18Your perceptron lacks a bias term, your equation is of form SUM_i w_i x_i,
instead of SUM_i w_i x_i + b
. With the functional form you have it is impossible to separate points, where the separating hyperplane does not cross the origin (and yours does not). Alternatively you can add a column of "1s" to your data, it will serve the same purpose, as the corresponding w_i
will just behave as b
(since all x_i
will be 1)
QUESTION
Are there tasks a sigle layer perceptron can do better than a multilayer perceptron? If yes, do you have an example?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 20:28Any dataset, where the underlying relation is linear, but number of training datapoints is very low will benefit from having the linear model to begin with. It is a relation of task + amount of data, more than nature of the task itself. Another example could be a bit contrived task of extrapolation, where you train on data in [0, 1] x [0, 1] but for some reason test for values in >1,000,000. If the underlying relation was linear, a linear model should have much lower error in the extreme extrapolation regime, as a nonlinear one can just do whatever it "wants" and bend anywhere outside [0,1] x [0,1].
QUESTION
i am using du functional api from keras and would like to add a dropout to my multi layer perceptron.
do i have to put the dropout before or after the layer and do i have to connect the next layer to the dropout or to the previous layer?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 19:49The second option is the right one. You always need to connect the layers in the order you want to use them.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-12 at 14:16There is one bias per neuron, not one global bias. In typical implementations you see one bias variable because it is a vector, where i'th dimension is added to i'th neuron.
In the non standard network you drew the update rule is actually ... neither! It should be a sum of your equations. Note, that if you have bias that is a vector, then using a sum will actually work too, because your partial derivatives that you computed will only affect corresponding dimensions!
QUESTION
Why is tensor flow throwing me this exception " module 'tensorboard.summary._tf.summary' has no attribute 'FileWriter'" each time i try to run my MCP Neuron, How can i go about solving the issue at hand ? I have search on stack but couldn't find any solution that fit my problem. can anyone help me out.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 09:14Try using either:
QUESTION
I have a general question about Keras. When training a Artificial Neural Network (e.g. a Multi-Layer-Perceptron or a LSTM) with a split of training, validation and test data (e.g. 70 %, 20 %, 10 %), I would like to know which parameter configuration the trained model is eventually using for predictions?
Here I have an exmaple from a training process with 11 epoch:
I could think about 3 possible parameter configurations (surely there are also others):
- The configuration that led to the lowest error in the training dataset (which would be after the 11th epoch)
- The configuration after the last epoch (which would the after the 11th epoch, as in 1.)
- The configuration that led to the lowest error in the validation dataset (which would be after the 3rd epoch)
If you just build the model without for example like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-04 at 11:06It would be the configuration after the last epoch (the 2nd possible configuration that you have mentioned).
QUESTION
Suppose I have my custom loss function and I want to fit the solution of some differential equation with help of my neural network. So in each forward pass, I am calculating the output of my neural net and then calculating the loss by taking the MSE with the expected equation to which I want to fit my perceptron.
Now my doubt is: should I use grad(loss)
or should I do loss.backward()
for backpropagation to calculate and update my gradients?
I understand that while using loss.backward() I have to wrap my tensors with Variable and have to set the requires_grad = True for the variables w.r.t which I want to take the gradient of my loss.
So my questions are :
- Does
grad(loss)
also requires any such explicit parameter to identify the variables for gradient computation? - How does it actually compute the gradients?
- Which approach is better?
- what is the main difference between the two in a practical scenario.
It would be better if you could explain the practical implications of both approaches because whenever I try to find it online I am just bombarded with a lot of stuff that isn't much relevant to my project.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-12 at 12:57TLDR; Both are two different interfaces to perform gradient computation: torch.autograd.grad
is non-mutable while torch.autograd.backward
is.
The torch.autograd
module is the automatic differentiation package for PyTorch. As described in the documentation it only requires minimal change to code base in order to be used:
you only need to declare
Tensor
s for which gradients should be computed with therequires_grad=True
keyword.
The two main functions torch.autograd
provides for gradient computation are torch.autograd.backward
and torch.autograd.grad
:
torch.autograd.backward
(source)
torch.autograd.grad
(source)
Description
Computes the sum of gradients of given tensors with respect to graph leaves.
Computes and returns the sum of gradients of outputs with respect to the inputs.
Header
torch.autograd.backward(
tensors,
grad_tensors=None,
retain_graph=None,
create_graph=False,
grad_variables=None,
inputs=None)
torch.autograd.grad(
outputs,
inputs,
grad_outputs=None,
retain_graph=None,
create_graph=False,
only_inputs=True,
allow_unused=False)
Parameters
- tensors
– Tensors of which the derivative will be computed.-
grad_tensors
– The "vector" in the Jacobian-vector product, usually gradients w.r.t. each element of corresponding tensors.-
retain_graph
– If False
, the graph used to compute the grad will be freed. [...]-
inputs
– Inputs w.r.t. which the gradient be will be accumulated into .grad
. All other Tensors will be ignored. If not provided, the gradient is accumulated into all the leaf Tensors that were used [...].
- outputs
– outputs of the differentiated function.-
inputs
– Inputs w.r.t. which the gradient will be returned (and not accumulated into .grad
).-
grad_tensors
– The "vector" in the Jacobian-vector product, usually gradients w.r.t. each element of corresponding tensors.-
retain_graph
– If False
, the graph used to compute the grad will be freed. [...].
Usage examples
In terms of high-level usage, you can look at torch.autograd.grad
as a non-mutable function. As mentioned in the documentation table above, it will not accumulate the gradients on the grad
attribute but instead return the computed partial derivatives. In contrast torch.autograd.backward
will be able to mutate the tensors by updating the grad
attribute of leaf nodes, the function won't return any value. In other words, the latter is more suitable when computing gradients for a large number of parameters.
In the following, we will take two inputs (x1
and, x2
), calculate a tensor y
with them, and then compute the partial derivatives of the result w.r.t both inputs, i.e. dL/dx1
and dL/dx2
:
QUESTION
I have this neural network model to create anomaly detection model. I copy this model from one of a tutorial website
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-08 at 09:11You are correct, 16, 4... are number of LSTM cells. About return sequences, here is need to understand what is LSTM input. LSTM input have shape time steps, features(I not assume here batch dimension).
Maybe example will be better for explanation, let say you want to predict average temperature for next hour based on past few hours and humidity. So your data looks like(just concept, no real deal values)
QUESTION
Let N be a (linear) single-layer perceptron with weight matrix w of dimension nxn.
I want to train N under the Boolean constraint that the condition number k(w) of the weights w remain below a given threshold k_0 at each step of the optimisation.
Is there a standard way to implement this constraint (in pytorch, say)?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-27 at 15:42After each optimizer step, go through the list of parameters and recondition all matrices:
(code looked at for a few seconds, but not tested)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Perceptron
Operation menu (Files, Skins)
Output the result screen
Read the file
File path
Adjustable parameters
Output the result
Generate new results
Adjust the output image screen zoom level
List of training materials (2/3 of total data)
List of test data (1/3 of total data)
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page