ModelCreator | A program to create JSON models for blocks | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | ModelCreator Summary
kandi X-RAY | ModelCreator Summary
A program to create JSON models for blocks
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Initialize the menu
- Show the model for export
- Show settings
- Write the vox shape
- On render the canvas
- Draw a quad
- Initialize the components
- Creates the rotation slider
- Draws this component
- Find the face of the mouse
- Main loop
- Add components to the form
- Main entry point
- Initialize components
- Process the mouse event
- Render the model
- Called when the view has been painted
- Init this panel
- Create the elements
- Initialize the properties
- Add elements in the body
- Initialize the buttons
- Writes the descriptor
- Add the elements in the frame
- Renders the model
- Create a directory selector for a directory
ModelCreator Key Features
ModelCreator Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ModelCreator
QUESTION
I want to turn off ALL (or at least most of) conventions in Entity Framework Core (and I am talking about EF Core 5 or above) and then build the whole model "by hands".
One may wonder why.
Here is why: I have a task to migrate several large legacy databases from Entity Framework 6 (EF
) to Entity Framework Core 5 (EFC
). This involves many hundreds of tables and several databases. Some of these databases are created using a Code First approach and some are just third party databases, which we need to query and update from C# code. For the latter databases we must match their schema exactly.
Due to the size of the problem both EF
and EFC
flavors of the code must coexist for, let's say, several months. This can be easily achieved by using conditional compilation (see below).
Most likely anything that is not supported or is inconveniently supported in EFC
in comparison to EF
(or was "hacked" into EF
models), like spatial indexes, multi-column KeyAttribute
PKs, multi-column ForeignKeyAttribute
FKs, self-referencing multiple times tables, multiple indexes defined on the same columns (some are filters and some are just regular indexes), and so on and so forth is there.
That's fine. I can easily deal with EFC
inability to deal with that by "overriding" the attributes using conditional compilation, e.g.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 08:18It's possible by building the IModel
by hand
QUESTION
I've created a simple class which I'd like to have return a model.
One of the methods is a simple normalizer which I'd like to be able to call from within another block of code. However it's not finding it. Here's what I have:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-30 at 20:03You only need df
as a parameter to modelCreator()
. You then access your norm
method via self.norm
. Below is your code updated.
QUESTION
I've developed a CQRS style database access framework based on Tripod and other inspirations but targeting .NET Standard and simplifying for easier use. I want to split the IoC into separate integration packages so consumers can get the type registration I'm currently doing internally easily without being locked into a specific IoC container. My issue is I've only really worked closely with SimpleInjector so not familiar with other systems and their nuances around how they handle specific scenarios. I have an iminent need to support Autofac so thought I'd try here to see if anyone can translate.
I have the following Simple Injector CompositionRoot static class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-24 at 07:33I worked out the process and now have an AutoFac module. I was able to registermodule by instance of the class and also pass in the options when I instantiate. Because EntityDbContext implements the three interfaces I was registering separately in the Simple Injector scenario, AutoFac has the convenience of being able to just infer them and register with AsImplementedInterfaces()
QUESTION
I'm trying to make a cpp interface class (pure virtual) declare a function that all derived classes must implement. However because the interface class is trying to be ignorant of implementation details, it doesn't know about the type of the returned object, and would like to delegate that to the derived class. The specific type of the returned object is handled by the derived class.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-07 at 06:40Two options come in my mind, depending what fit better in your project:
1) Use a placeholder for return type:
QUESTION
I have a task:
Implement metaclass "ModelCreator", that allows to declare class fields in the following form:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-27 at 09:04This code is a bit convoluted - but it is doing nothing les than what you told it to do.
And what it does, besides the needed descriptor (i.e.: the class containing the __get__
and __set__
methods) and usual metaclass mechanisms is plugging in a __new__
method to the class that is wrong in several ways.
For one, the new
method that is assigned to the class __new__
ends its executing by using a hardcoded call to type.
- that is the most wrong thing of all - as type returns a new class - not an instance. The call at the end of the plugged new
method should be to object.__new__
- or better yet, using a mechanism that would call the __new__
in the next class on its __mro__
(but that would not that be trivial - as you will have to find that in the metaclass __new__
code surrounding the new
method you are plugging in).
Anyway - it only would make sense to call type
there if you would want classes that use this metaclass to be themselves "class factories" - that would return whole new classes not only with the declared fields, but with the sent-in defaults. And calling type is why you are seeing type(st)
returning type
- which is your first question.
Then, it is still wrong: the new
class method, which is called at each instantation, sets the default attribute to the descritor (i.e. "field") - and that default will apply to every other instantiation of the same class - or other classes that inherit from it. You should set the default, if any, on the call to your StringField
class - and on the method that will become the __new__
on the class, set the value for the instance.
That can be done if you first call the superclass __new__
to obtain an actual instance, and then loop though the passed in keyword arguments, and use setattr
as the mechanism to set the attribute. Using setattr will ensure the StringField __set__
method is properly called.
So, there are many things weird in this code, but an attempt to fix it go by re-writting your metaclass __new__
to be more or less:
QUESTION
I'm working on a simple time series regression problem using Keras, I want to predict the next closing price using the last 20 closing prices, I have the following code according to some examples I found:
I write my sequential model in a separated function, as needed by "build_fn" parameter:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Apr-10 at 19:08Your network is not converging. Try changing the parameters. The loss should reduce consistently. Also initialize the parameters properly.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ModelCreator
You can use ModelCreator like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the ModelCreator component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page