elasticsearch-sql | Use SQL to query Elasticsearch | SQL Database library
kandi X-RAY | elasticsearch-sql Summary
kandi X-RAY | elasticsearch-sql Summary
6.8.20 [6.8.20 Build Status] 7.15.1 [7.15.1 Build Status] master [master Build Status] Query elasticsearch using familiar SQL syntax. You can also use ES functions in SQL.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Recycle connection
- Adds a connection holder to the pool
- Add a new connection to the queue
- Discard a connection
- Parses a match
- Parses the primary rest
- Parses a single parameter
- Executes query action
- Execute query action
- Returns a map with the information about this pool
- Read an identifier
- Performs inner search
- Executes the SQL statement
- Prepare the REST request
- Executes the query
- Sets connect properties
- Parses an interval
- Parses a single partition
- Build a map of data for MBean objects
- Parse an assignment item
- Return the number of stale connections
- Get a list of all pooled connection info
- Parses a foreign key
- Parses a unique attribute
- Main implementation of the inner run method
- Parses the primary key
elasticsearch-sql Key Features
elasticsearch-sql Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on elasticsearch-sql
QUESTION
This is a follow-up to the question Why doesn't BigQuery perform as well on small data sets.
Let's suppose I have a data-set that is ~1M rows. In the current database that we're using (mysql) aggregation queries would run quite slow, perhaps taking ~10s or so on complex aggregations. On BigQuery, the initialization time required might make this query take ~3 seconds, better than in mysql, but the wrong tool for the job, if we need to return queries in 1s or under.
My question then is, what would be a good alternative to using BigQuery on doing aggregated queries on moderate-sized data-sets, such as 1-10M rows? An example query might be:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-11 at 00:19If you don't need concurrency, multiple users connecting simultaneously, and your data can fit in a single disk file, then SQLite might be appropriate.
As they say, SQLite does not compete with client/server databases. SQLite competes with fopen().
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install elasticsearch-sql
Install as plugin: Versions.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page